The role of thinking-aloud instructions and prior domain knowledge in information processing and source evaluation during Web search

Cooperative Minds: Social Interaction and Group Dynamics - Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 716-721

  Kammerer, Yvonne ^a   Gerjets, Peter ^a  

^a KNOWLEDGE MEDIA RESEARCH CENTER   (Germany)

Author keywords

eye tracking; prior domain knowledge; source evaluation; thinking aloud instructions; Web search

Indexed keywords

EYE TRACKING; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; SEARCH ENGINES; WEBSITES;

CONDITION; DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; ERICSSON; EYE-TRACKING; MULTI-METHOD APPROACH; PRIOR DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE; SOURCE EVALUATIONS; THINKING ALOUD; THINKING-ALOUD INSTRUCTION; WEB SEARCHES;

DOMAIN KNOWLEDGE;

EID: 85081943551     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., & Salmerón, L. (2011). Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change. Learning and Instruction, 21, 180-192.
3. Ericsson, K. A., & Simon, H. A. (1993). Protocol analysis: Verbal reports as data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Fox, M. C., Ericsson, K. A., & Best, R. (2011). Do procedures for verbal reporting of thinking have to be reactive? A meta-analysis and recommendations for best reporting methods. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 316-344.
5. Gerjets, P., Kammerer, Y., & Werner, B. (2011). Measuring spontaneous and instructed evaluation processes during web search: Integrating concurrent thinking-aloud protocols and eye-tracking data. Learning and Instruction, 21, 220-231.
6. Hargittai, E., Fullerton, L., Menchen-Trevino, E., & Thomas, K. Y. (2010). Trust online: young adults' evaluation of Web content. International Journal of Communications, 4, 468-494.
7. Hertzum, M., Hansen, K. D., & Andersen, H. H. K. (2009). Scrutinising usability evaluation: Does thinking aloud affect behaviour and mental workload? Behaviour and Information Technology, 28, 165-181.
8. Hyönä, J., Tommola, J., & Alaja, A.-M. (1995). Pupil dilation as a measure of processing load in simultaneous interpretation and other language tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48A, 598-612.
9. Josephson, S. & Holmes, M. E. (2002). Visual attention to repeated internet images: testing the scanpath theory on the world wide web. In A.T. Duchowski (Ed), Proceedings of the ETRA 2002 Symposium. ACM Press.
10. MaKinster, J. G., Beghetto, R. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2002). Why can't I find Newton's Third Law?: Case studies of students using of the Web as a science resource. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11, 155-172.
11. Metzger, M. J. (2007). Making sense of credibility on the Web: Models for evaluating online information and recommendations for future research. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58, 2078-2091.
12. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer.
13. Rieh, S. Y. (2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 145-161.
14. Savolainen, R., & Kari, J. (2006). User-defined relevance criteria in Web searching. Journal of Documentation, 62, 685-707.
15. Tombros, A., Ruthven, I., & Jose, J. M. (2005). How users assess Web pages for information-seeking. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56, 327-344.
16. Wang, J. T. (2010). Pupil dilation and eye-tracking. In M. Schulte-Mecklenbeck, A. Kuhberger, & R. Ranyard (Eds.), A handbook of process tracing methods for decision research: a critical review and user's guide. New York: Psychology Press.