The enacted curriculum: A video based analysis of instruction and learning in high school pre-engineering classrooms

ASEE Annual Conference and Exposition, Conference Proceedings

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Prevost, Amy ^a   Nathan, Mitchell ^a   Stein, Benjamin ^b   Phelps, Allen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MADISON   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; EDUCATION; INTEGRATION; NATIONAL SECURITY; PROBLEM SOLVING; TEACHING;

CONCEPTUAL KNOWLEDGE; ECONOMIC PROSPERITY; ENGINEERING ACTIVITIES; ENGINEERING SKILLS; EXPLICIT CONNECTIONS; INTRODUCTION TO ENGINEERING; TECHNICAL EDUCATIONS; TECHNOLOGICAL INNOVATION;

ENGINEERING EDUCATION;

EID: 85081520985     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21535965     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. Porter, A., Floden, R., Freeman, D., Schmidt, W., & Schille, J. (1988). Content determinants in elementary school mathematics. In D.A. Grouws & T.J. Cooney (Eds.), Perspectives on research on effective mathematical teaching (pp. 96-113). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Gamoran, A., Porter, A.C., Smithson, J., & White, P.A. (1997, Winter). Upgrading high school mathematics instruction: Improving learning opportunities for low-achieving, low-income youth. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(4), 325-338.
3. Porter, A.C. (2002, October). Measuring the content of instruction: Uses in research and practice. Educational Researcher, 31(7), 3-14.
4. Porter, A. C. (2004). Curriculum assessment. In J. C. Green, G. Camill & P. B. Elmore (Eds). Complementary methods for research in education (3rd edition), Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
5. Porter, A.C., Kirst, M.W., Osthoff, E.J., Smithson, J.S., & Schneider, S.A. (1993). Reform up close: An analysis of high school mathematics and science classrooms.
6. Porter, A.C. (1989). A curriculum out of balance: The case of elementary school mathematics. Educational Researcher 18(5), 9-15.
7. Porter, A.C., Kirst, M.W., Osthoff, E.J., Smithson, J.S., & Schneider, S.A. (1993). Reform up close: An analysis of high school mathematics and science classrooms.
8. Gamoran, A., Porter, A.C., Smithson, J., & White, P.A. (1997, Winter). Upgrading high school mathematics instruction: Improving learning opportunities for low-achieving, low-income youth. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(4), 325-338.
9. Nathan, M. J., Oliver, K., Prevost, A., Tran, N., & Phelps, L. A. (2009). Classroom learning and instruction in high school pre-engineering settings: A video-based analysis. Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) 2009.
10. Thorndike, E. L., & Woodworth, R. S. (1901). The influence of improvement in one mental function 22 upon the efficacy of other functions. Psychological Review, 8, 247-261.
11. Perkins, D.N. and Salomon, G. (1992). Transfer of learning. Contribution to the International Encyclopedia of Education (2nd Ed.). Oxford, England: Pergamon Press. Retrieved 15 March 2009 from http://learnweb.harvard.edu/ thinking/docs/traencyn.htm.
12. Fisher, S.L. and Ford, J.K. (1998). Differential effects of learner effort and goal orientation on two learning outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 1998 (51), 397-420.
13. Dunlap, J.C. (2005). Problem-based learning and self-efficacy: How a capstone course prepares students for a profession. Education Technology Research and Development, 53 (1), 65-85.
14. Prevost, A., Nathan, M., Stein, B., Tran, N. and Phelps, A. (2009). The integration of mathematics in precollege engineering: The search for explicit connections. Proceedings of the 2009 American Society for Engineering Edcuation Annual Conference, Austin, Texas, June 14-17, 2009. Available online at http://sca.asee.org/paper/conference/paperview.cfm?id=11744.
15. Fassnacht, C., & Woods, D. (2005). Transana v2.0x [Computer software]. Available from http://www.transana.org.
16. Streveler, R. A., Litzinger, T. A., Miller, R. L., & Steif, P. S. (2008). Learning conceptual knowledge in the engineering sciences: Overview and future research directions. Journal of Engineering Education, 97, 279-294.
17. Gero, J.S. & Mc Neill, T. (1998). An approach to the analysis of design protocols. Design Studies, 19(1), 21-61.
18. Massachusetts Department of Education. (2006, October). Massachusetts Science and Technology/Engineering Curriculum Framework. Retrieved June 5, 2008, from www.doe.mass.edu/frameworks/scitech/1006.pdf.
19. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
20. Kennington, A.U. (2008). principles of engineering. topology.org: Alan U. Kennington's web links. Retrieved June 5, 2008, from http://www.topology.org/ philo/eng.html.
21. Redish, E. F., and K.A. Smith. 2008. Looking beyond content: Skill development for engineers. Journal of Engineering Education 97 (3): 295-307.
22. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Principles and standards for school mathematics. Reston, VA: Author.
23. Bransford, J. D. and Schwartz. D. L. (1999). Rethinking transfer: A simple proposal with multiple implications. Review of Research in Education, 24, 61-100.
24. Judd, C. H. (1908). The relation of special training to general intelligence. Educational Review, 36, 28-42.
25. Stone, J.R., Alfeld, C., & Pearson, D. (2008). Rigor and relevance: Enhancing high school students' math skills through career and technical education. American Educational Research Journal, 45(3), 767-795.
26. Moss, D.M., Settlage, J. and Koehler, C. (2008). Beyond trivial science: Assessing understandings of the nature of science. In Moss, D.A., Osborn, T.A. and Kaufman, D. (Eds.) Interdisciplinary Education in the Age of Assessment. New York: Routledge.
27. Pellegrino, J.W., Chudowsky, N., Glaser, R. (Eds.), Knowing what students know: The science and design of educational assessment. National Academy Press, Washington, DC.
28. Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational Researcher, 18 (1), 32-41.