Sustainable vehicle routing based on firefly algorithm and TOPSIS methodology

Sustainable Futures

Volumn 1, Issue , 2019, Pages

  Micale, R ^a   Marannano, G ^a   Giallanza, A ^a   Miglietta, P P ^b   Agnusdei, G P ^c   La Scalia, G ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PALERMO   (Italy)

^b FREE UNIVERSITY OF BOZEN BOLZANO   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SALENTO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Decision making; Firefly algorithm; Sustainability; TOPSIS; Vehicle routing problem

Indexed keywords

EID: 85081014860     PISSN: 26661888     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sftr.2019.100001     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Alonso, A., Monzón, A., Cascajo, R., Comparative analysis of passenger transport sustainability in European cities. Ecol. Indic. 48 (2015), 578–592.
2. Braekers, K., Ramaekers, K., Van Nieuwenhuyse, I., The vehicle routing problem: state of the art classification and review. Comput. Ind. Eng. 99 (2016), 300–313.
3. Cao, B., Glover, F., Rego, C., A tabu search algorithm for cohesive clustering problems. J. Heuristics 21:4 (2015), 457–477.
4. de Armas, J., Melián-Batista, B., Moreno-Pérez, J.A., Brito, J., GVNS for a real-world rich vehicle routing problem with time windows. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 42 (2015), 45–56.
5. Ebrahimi, S.B., A stochastic multi-objective location-allocation-routing problem for tire supply chain considering sustainability aspects and quantity discounts. J. Clean. Prod. 198 (2018), 704–720.
6. Delbecq, A.L., Van de Ven, A.H., Gustafson, D.H., Group Techniques for Program Planning: A Guide to Nominal Group and Delphi Processes. 1975, Scott, Foresman, Glenview, IL, 83–107.
7. Fister, I., Yang, X.S., Fister, D., Firefly Algorithm: a Brief Review of the Expanding Literature. In Cuckoo Search and Firefly Algorithm. 2014, Springer, Cham, 347–360.
8. Fister, I., I., Fister Jr, Yang, X.S., Brest, J., A comprehensive review of firefly algorithms. Swarm Evol. Comput. 13 (2013), 34–46.
9. Haghshenas, H., Vaziri, M., Urban sustainable transportation indicators for global comparison. Ecol. Indic. 15:1 (2012), 115–121.
10. Haghani, A., Jung, S., A dynamic vehicle routing problem with time-dependent travel times. Comput. Oper. Res. 32:11 (2005), 2959–2986.
11. Herrero, R., Villalobos, A.R., Cáceres-Cruz, J., Juan, A.A., Solving vehicle routing problems with asymmetric costs and heterogeneous fleets. Int. J. Adv. Oper. Manag. 6:1 (2014, March), 58–80 Inderscience.
12. Hosseini-Nasab, H., Loftalian, P., Green routing for trucking systems with classification of path types. J. Clean. Prod. 146 (2017), 228–233.
13. Hwang, C.L., Yoon, K., Methods for multiple attribute decision making. Multiple Attribute Decision Making, 1981, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 58–191.
14. İnkaya, T., Kayalıgil, S., Özdemirel, N.E., Ant colony optimization based clustering methodology. Appl. Soft. Comput. 28 (2015), 301–311.
15. IPCC. IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme. Eggleston, H.S., Buendia, L., Miwa, K., Ngara, T., Tanabe, K., (eds.) IPCC Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories, Prepared by the National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, 2006, Published: IGES, Japan, 2006.
16. IPCC. Good practice guidance and uncertainty management in national greenhouse gas inventories. IPCC National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, 2000, Technical Support Unit, Hayama, Kanagawa, Japan.
17. IPCC. Three volumes: Reference Manual, Reporting Manual, Reporting Guidelines and Workbook., 1997, IPCC/OECD/IEA. IPCC WG1 Technical Support Unit, Hadley Centre, Meteorological Centre, Meteorological Office, Bracknell, UK.
18. Liang, R.H., Wang, J.C., Chen, Y.T., Tseng, W.T., An enhanced firefly algorithm to multi-objective optimal active/reactive power dispatch with uncertainties consideration. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 64 (2015), 1088–1097.
19. Lai, Y.J., Liu, T.Y., Hwang, C.L., Topsis for modm. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 76:3 (1994), 486–500.
20. Lahyani, R., Khemakhem, M., Semet, F., Rich vehicle routing problems: from a taxonomy to a definition. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 241:1 (2015), 1–14.
21. Ma, Y., Zhao, Y., Wu, L., He, Y., Yang, X.S., Navigability analysis of magnetic map with projecting pursuit-based selection method by using firefly algorithm. Neurocomputing 159 (2015), 288–297.
22. Mahdinia, I., Habibian, M., Hatamzadeh, Y., Gudmundsson, H., An indicator-based algorithm to measure transportation sustainability: a case study of the US states. Ecol. Indic. 89 (2018), 738–754.
23. Niu, Y., Yang, Z., Chen, P., Xiao, J., Optimizing the green open vehicle routing problem with time windows by minimizing comprehensive routing cost. J. Clean. Prod. 171 (2018), 962–971 10 January.
24. Onat, N.C., Gumus, S., Kucukvar, M., Tatari, O., Application of the topsis and intuitionistic fuzzy set approaches for ranking the life cycle sustainability performance of alternative vehicle technologies. Sustain. Prod. Consum. 6 (2016), 12–25.
25. Pan, F., Ye, C., Wang, K., Cao, J., Research on the vehicle routing problem with time windows using firefly algorithm. J. Clean. Prod. 8:9 (2013), 2256–2261.
26. Pandey, D., Agrawal, M., Pandey, J.S., Carbon footprint: current methods of estimation. Environ. Monit. Assess. 178:1–4 (2011), 135–160.
27. Reisi, M., Aye, L., Rajabifard, A., Ngo, T., Transport sustainability index: Melbourne case study. Ecol. Indic. 43 (2014), 288–296.
28. Rodriguez, A., Gutierrez, A., Rivera, L., Ramirez, L., Rwa: comparison of genetic algorithms and simulated annealing in dynamic traffic. Advanced Computer and Communication Engineering Technology, 2015, Springer, Cham, 3–14.
29. Shiau, T.A., Liu, J.S., Developing an indicator system for local governments to evaluate transport sustainability strategies. Ecol. Indic. 34 (2013), 361–371.
30. Toth, P., Vigo, D., An overview of vehicle routing problems. The Vehicle Routing Problem, 2002, Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 1–26.
31. Vidal, T., Crainic, T.G., Gendreau, M., Prins, C., A hybrid genetic algorithm with adaptive diversity management for a large class of vehicle routing problems with time-windows. Comput. Oper. Res. 40:1 (2013), 475–489.
32. Yang, X.S., A new metaheuristic bat-inspired algorithm. Nature Inspired Cooperative Strategies for Optimization (NICSO 2010), 2010, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 65–74.
33. Xiao, Y., Konak, A., A genetic algorithm with exact dynamic programming for the green vehicle routing & scheduling problem. J. Clean. Prod. 167 (2017), 1450–1463 20 November.
34. Wu, Y., Ye, C.M., Ma, H.M., Xia, M.Y., Parallel particle swarm optimization algorithm for vehicle routing problems with time windows. Jisuanji Gongcheng yu Yingyong(Comput. Eng. Appl.) 43:14 (2007), 223–226.
35. Govindan, K., Jafarian, A., Khodaverdi, R., Devika, K., Two-echelon multiple-vehicle location–routing problem with time windows for optimization of sustainable supply chain network of perishable food. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 152 (2014), 9–28.
36. Postacchini, L., Mazzuto, G., Paciarotti, C., Ciarapica, F.E., Reuse of honey jars for healthier bees: Developing a sustainable honey jars supply chain through the use of LCA. J. Cleaner Prod. 177 (2018), 573–588.
37. Govindan, K., Jafarian, A., Nourbakhsh, V., Designing a sustainable supply chain network integrated with vehicle routing: A comparison of hybrid swarm intelligence metaheuristics. Comput. Oper. Res. 110 (2019), 220–235.
38. Soysal, M., Çimen, M., Belbağ, S., Toğrul, E., A review on sustainable inventory routing. Comput. Ind. Eng. 132 (2019), 395–411.