Regular (ICSI) versus ultra-high magnification (IMSI) sperm selection for assisted reproduction

Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews

Volumn 2020, Issue 2, 2020, Pages

  Teixeira, Danielle M ^a   Hadyme Miyague, Andre ^b   Barbosa, Mariana AP ^c   Navarro, Paula A ^c   Raine Fenning, Nick ^d   Nastri, Carolina O ^e   Martins, Wellington P ^e  

^a FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF PARANÁ   (Brazil)

^b HOSPITAL UNIVERSITÁRIO EVANGÉLICO DE CURITIBA   (Brazil)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^d UNIVERSITY OF NOTTINGHAM   (United Kingdom)

^e Reproductive Medicine   (Brazil)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL EFFECTIVENESS; CLINICAL OUTCOME; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; CONGENITAL DISORDER; FUNDING; HIGH RISK PREGNANCY; HUMAN; INFERTILITY THERAPY; INTRACYTOPLASMIC MORPHOLOGICALLY SELECTED SPERM INJECTION; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; LIVE BIRTH; LOW RISK PATIENT; MICROSCOPY; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); REGULAR MAGNIFICATION; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW; RISK ASSESSMENT; SAFETY; SPERM QUALITY; SPONTANEOUS ABORTION; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; THERAPY EFFECT; ULTRA HIGH MAGNIFICATION; FEMALE; MALE; MALE INFERTILITY; META ANALYSIS; MICROMANIPULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PROCEDURES; SPERM RETRIEVAL; SPERMATOZOON;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INFERTILITY, MALE; MALE; MICROMANIPULATION; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY RATE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; REPRODUCTIVE TECHNIQUES, ASSISTED; SPERM INJECTIONS, INTRACYTOPLASMIC; SPERM RETRIEVAL; SPERMATOZOA;

EID: 85079811215     PISSN: None     EISSN: 1469493X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010167.pub3     Document Type: Review

References (52)

1. Antinori M, Licata E, Dani G, Cerusico F, Versaci C, d'Angelo D, et al. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection: a prospective randomized trial. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2008;16(6):835-41. [PUBMED: 18549694]x-wiley/crsRef/2886625
2. Antinori S, Licata E, Dani G, Cerusico F, Versaci C, Antinori M. A prospective randomized trial to verify the efficacy of IMSI procedure in daily IVF routine. Human Reproduction 2008;23 Suppl 1:i165. x-wiley/crsRef/2886626
3. Balaban B, Yakin K, Alatas C, Oktem O, Isiklar A, Urman B. Clinical outcome of intracytoplasmic injection of spermatozoa morphologically selected under high magnification: a prospective randomized study. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2011;22(5):472-6. [PUBMED: 21324747]x-wiley/crsRef/2886628
4. Check JH, Bollendorf A, Summers-Chase D, Yuan W, Horwath D. Isolating sperm by selecting those with normal nuclear morphology prior to intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) does not provide better pregnancy rates compared to conventional ICSI in women with repeated conception failure with in vitro fertilization. Clinical and Experimental Obstetrics & Gynecology 2013;40:15-7. x-wiley/crsRef/2886669
5. Figueira RCS, Braga DPAF, Pasqualotto EB, Pasqualotto FF, Iaconelli A, Borges E. The role of morphological nuclear integrity of the sperm cells in preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening cycles outcome. Journal fur Reproduktionsmedizin und Endokrinologie 2010;7:250-1. x-wiley/crsRef/2886630
6. Figueira RDC, Braga DP, Setti AS, Iaconelli A Jr, Borges E Jr. Morphological nuclear integrity of sperm cells is associated with preimplantation genetic aneuploidy screening cycle outcomes. Fertility and Sterility 2011;95(3):990-3. [PUBMED: 21130987]x-wiley/crsRef/2886631
7. Knez K, Zorn B, Tomazevic T, Vrtacnik-Bokal E, Virant-Klun I. The IMSI procedure improves poor embryo development in the same infertile couples with poor semen quality: a comparative prospective randomized study. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2011;9:123. [PUBMED: 21875440]x-wiley/crsRef/2886633
8. Knez K, Tomazevic T, Zorn B, Vrtacnik-Bokal E, Virant-Klun I. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection improves development and quality of preimplantation embryos in teratozoospermia patients. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2012;25(2):168-79. [PUBMED: 22717245]x-wiley/crsRef/2886635
9. Leandri RD, Gachet A, Pfeffer J, Celebi C, Rives N, Carre-Pigeon F, et al. Is intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) beneficial in the first ART cycle? a multicentric randomized controlled trial. Andrology 2013;1(5):692-7. [CTG: NCT01780649]x-wiley/crsRef/12896132
10. Mahmoud K, Triki-Hmam C, Terras K, Zhioua F, Hfaiedh T, Ben Aribia MH. How and in which indication the IMSI could improve outcomes?. Human Reproduction 2011;26 Suppl 1:i181. x-wiley/crsRef/2886637
11. Mangoli E, Khalili MA, Talebi AR, Agha-Rahimi A, Soleimani M, Faramarzi A, et al. IMSI procedure improves clinical outcomes and embryo morphokinetics in patients with different aetiologies of male infertility. Andrologia 2019;51(8):e13340. [PUBMED: 31197867]x-wiley/crsRef/12896134
12. Marci R, Murisier F, Lo Monte G, Soave I, Chanson A, Urner F, et al. Clinical outcome after IMSI procedure in an unselected infertile population: a pilot study. Reproductive Health 2013;10:16. x-wiley/crsRef/12896136
13. Setti AS, Figueira Rde C, Braga DP, Iaconelli A Jr, Borges E Jr. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection benefits for patients with oligoasthenozoospermia according to the 2010 World Health Organization reference values. Fertility and Sterility 2011;95(8):2711-4. [PUBMED: 21458802]x-wiley/crsRef/2886639
14. Iaconelli JA, Figueira RCS, Setti AS, Braga DPAF, Pasqualotto EE, Borges E Jr. Gender incidence on intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection approach: a prospective randomized study. Human Reproduction 2011;26 Suppl 1:i71. x-wiley/crsRef/2886641
15. Setti AS, Figueira RC, Braga DP, Iaconelli A Jr, Borges E Jr. Gender incidence of intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection-derived embryos: a prospective randomized study. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2012;24(4):420-3. [PUBMED: 22377154]x-wiley/crsRef/2886642
16. Setti AS, Figueira RCS, Braga DPAF, Aoki T, Iaconelli Jr A, Borges Jr E. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection is beneficial in cases of advanced maternal age: A prospective randomized study. European Journal of Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 2013;171(2):286-90. [PMID: 24103532]x-wiley/crsRef/12896137
17. Setti AS, Figueira RDC, de Almeida Ferreira Braga DP, Iaconelli A, Borges E. IMSI is beneficial in cases of advanced maternal age: a prospective randomized study. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2012 (Withdrawn). [DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.10.020]x-wiley/crsRef/2886644
18. Apryshko VP, Yakovenko SA, Sivozhelezov VS, Yutkin EV, Rutman BK, Troshina MN, et al. IMSI based on Hoffman modulation contrast: 5 years experience. Reproductive BioMedicine Online 2010;20:S25. x-wiley/crsRef/2886646
19. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosovsky A, Yagoda A, Lederman H, et al. Pregnancy rates are higher with intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection than with conventional intracytoplasmic injection. Fertility and Sterility 2003;80(6):1413-9. [PUBMED: 14667877]x-wiley/crsRef/2886648
20. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Yaari S, Katz N, Barr I, Fishman A, et al. The morphological normalcy of the sperm nucleus and pregnancy rate of intracytoplasmic injection with morphologically selected sperm. Human Reproduction 2005;20(1):185-90. [PUBMED: 15471930]x-wiley/crsRef/2886650
21. Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Lederman H, Peer S, Ellenbogen A, Feldberg B, et al. How to improve IVF-ICSI outcome by sperm selection. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2006;12(5):634-8. [PUBMED: 16790113]x-wiley/crsRef/2886652
22. Braga DPAF, Setti AS, Figueira RC, Nichi M, Martinhago CD, Iaconelli A Jr, et al. Sperm organelle morphologic abnormalities: contributing factors and effects on intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles outcomes. Urology 2011;78(4):786-91. [PUBMED: 21820702]x-wiley/crsRef/2886654
23. Cassuto NG, Hazout A, Benifla JL, Balet R, Larue L, Viot G. Decreasing birth defect in children by using high magnification selected spermatozoon injection. Fertility and Sterility 2011;1:S85. x-wiley/crsRef/2886656
24. De Vos A, Van de Velde H, Bocken G, Eylenbosch G, Franceus N, Meersdom G, et al. Does intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection improve embryo development? A randomized sibling-oocyte study. Human Reproduction 2013;28:617-26. x-wiley/crsRef/2886658
25. Gatimel N, Parinaud J, Leandri RD. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) does not improve outcome in patients with two successive IVF-ICSI failures. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2016;33(3):349-55. [PUBMED: 26754750]x-wiley/crsRef/12896139
26. Ghazali S, Talebi AR, Khalili MA, Aflatoonian A. Impact of morphological parameters at high magnification, nuclear structure and ultrastructure of spermatozoa on ART outcomes. Human Reproduction 2017;32(Suppl1):i249-i250. x-wiley/crsRef/12896141
27. Hazout A, Dumont-Hassan M, Junca AM, Cohen Bacrie P, Tesarik J. High-magnification ICSI overcomes paternal effect resistant to conventional ICSI. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2005;12(1):19-24. [PUBMED: 16454928]x-wiley/crsRef/2886660
28. Karabulut S, Aksunger O, Korkmaz O, Gozel HE, Keskin I. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection, but for whom?. Zygote 2019;27(5):299-304. x-wiley/crsRef/12896143
29. La Sala GB, Nicoli A, Fornaciari E, Falbo A, Rondini I, Morini D, Valli B, Villani MT, Palomba S. Retraction Note: Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection versus conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a randomized controlled trial. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2017;15:62. x-wiley/crsRef/12896145
30. La Sala GB, Nicoli A, Fornaciari E, Falbo A, Rondini I, Morini D, et al. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection versus conventional intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a randomized controlled trial. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2015 (retracted); Vol. 13, issue 1:97. x-wiley/crsRef/12896146
31. Mauri AL, Petersen CG, Oliveira JB, Massaro FC, Baruffi RL, Franco JG Jr. Comparison of day 2 embryo quality after conventional ICSI versus intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) using sibling oocytes. European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology 2011;150(1):42-6. [PUBMED: 20171776]x-wiley/crsRef/2886662
32. Oliveira JBA, Cavagna M, Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Massaro FC, Silva LFI, et al. Pregnancy outcomes in women with repeated implantation failures after intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI). Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2011;9:99. [PUBMED: 21781299]x-wiley/crsRef/2886664
33. Oliveira JBA, Petersen CG, Mauri AL, Massaro FC, Baruffi RLR, Franco JG Jr. Clinical outcomes of IMSI in previous ICSI failures. Fertility and Sterility 2010;1:S55. x-wiley/crsRef/2886665
34. Wilding M, Coppola G, di Matteo L, Palagiano A, Fusco E, Dale B. Intracytoplasmic injection of morphologically selected spermatozoa (IMSI) improves outcome after assisted reproduction by deselecting physiologically poor quality spermatozoa. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 2011;28(3):253-62. [PUBMED: 21072684]x-wiley/crsRef/2886667
35. Kim JW, Jeong SY, Yang SH, Yoon SH, Jung JH, Lim JH. Are hyaluronic acid sperm selection and intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection effective in patients with teratozoospermia?. Fertility and Sterility 2014;102 Suppl(3):e349. x-wiley/crsRef/12896148
36. NCT02107521. IMSI in couples with previous implantation failures. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02107521 (first posted 8 April 2014). x-wiley/crsRef/12896150
37. NCT02358733. Use of IMSI in poor responders to IVF. clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02358733 (first posted 9 February 2015). x-wiley/crsRef/12896152
38. Scarselli F, Casciani V, Lobascio AM, Colasante A, Spizzichino L, Biricik A, et al. IMSI selection in normozoospermic patients does not improve preimplantation genetic screening outcome. Human Reproduction 2014;29:i286-7. x-wiley/crsRef/12896154
39. Setti AS, Braga DPAF, Figueira RCS, Colturato SS, Iaconelli A, Borges E. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) benefits in the presence of unexplained infertility: a prospective randomized study. Fertility and Sterility 2012;98 Suppl 1(3):S80. x-wiley/crsRef/2886672
40. PACTR201411000928146. IMSI versus ICSI in patients with severe male factor infertility and repeated ICSI failure [Comparative study between intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection (IMSI) versus intracytoplasmic sperm injection(ICSI) in patients with severe male factor infertility and repeated ICSI failure]. apps.who.int/trialsearch/Trial3.aspx?trialid=PACTR201411000928146 (first registered 06 November 2014). x-wiley/crsRef/12896156
41. Agarwal A, Mulgund A, Hamada A, Chyatte MR. A unique view on male infertility around the globe. Reproductive Biology and Endocrinology 2015;26(13):37.
42. Balshem H, Helfand M, Schünemann HJ, Oxman AD, Kunz R, Brozek J, et al. GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 2011;64(4):401-6. [DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.015; PUBMED: 21208779]
43. Bartoov B, Berkovitz A, Eltes F, Kogosowski A, Menezo Y, Barak Y. Real-time fine morphology of motile human sperm cells is associated with IVF-ICSI outcome. Journal of Andrology 2002;23(1):1-8. [PUBMED: 11780915]
44. Duran-Retamal M, Morris G, Achilli C, Gaunt M, Theodorou E, Saab W, et al. Live birth and miscarriage rate following intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection vs intracytoplasmic sperm injection: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica [Epub 2019 August 30]. [DOI: 10.1111/aogs.13703; PUBMED: 31403712]
45. Gleicher N, Kushnir VA, Barad DH. Worldwide decline of IVF birth rates and its probable causes. Human Reproduction Open 2019;2019(3):hoz017.
46. McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime). GRADEpro GDT. Version accessed 1 September 2019. Hamilton (ON): McMaster University (developed by Evidence Prime).
47. He F, Wang MJ, Li SL, Zhang CY, Hu LN. IMSI versus ICSI for male factor infertility: A meta-analysis. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue 2018;24(3):254-62.
48. Higgins JPT, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
49. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JP, Green S, editor(s). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011). The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. Available from handbook.cochrane.org.
50. Palermo G, Joris H, Devroey P, Van Steirteghem AC. Pregnancies after intracytoplasmic injection of single spermatozoon into an oocyte. Lancet 1992;340(8810):17-8. [PUBMED: 1351601]
51. Setti AS, Ferreira RC, Braga DPAF, Figueira RCS, Iaconelli A Jr, Borges E Jr. Intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcome versus intracytoplasmic morphologically selected sperm injection outcome: a meta-analysis. Reproductive Biomedicine Online 2010;21(4):450-5. [PUBMED: 20800549]
52. Teixeira DM, Barbosa MA, Ferriani RA, Navarro PA, Raine-Fenning N, Nastri CO, et al. Regular (ICSI) versus ultra-high magnification (IMSI) sperm selection for assisted reproduction. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2013, Issue CD010167. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010167.pub2; PUBMED: 23884963]