How Firm Are the Foundations of Mind-Set Theory? The Claims Appear Stronger Than the Evidence

Psychological Science

Volumn 31, Issue 3, 2020, Pages 258-267

  Burgoyne, Alexander P ^a   Hambrick, David Z ^a   Macnamara, Brooke N ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CASE WESTERN RESERVE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

achievement; fixed mind set; growth mind set; implicit theories; mind set theory; open data; open materials; preregistered

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC SUCCESS; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL TRIAL; FEMALE; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; MALE; MOTIVATION; MULTICENTER STUDY; SELF CONCEPT; STUDENT; THEORY OF MIND;

ACADEMIC SUCCESS; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTELLIGENCE; MALE; MOTIVATION; SELF CONCEPT; STUDENTS; THEORY OF MIND;

EID: 85079007216     PISSN: 09567976     EISSN: 14679280     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0956797619897588     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Boaler J., (2013). Ability and mathematics: The mindset revolution that is reshaping education. Forum, 55, 143–152.
2. Brown E. D., (2009). Persistence in the face of academic challenge for economically disadvantaged children. Journal of Early Childhood Research, 7, 173–184. doi:10.1177/1476718X09102650
3. Burnette J. L., O’Boyle E. H., VanEpps E. M., Pollack J. M., Finkel E. J., (2013). Mind-sets matter: A meta-analytic review of implicit theories and self-regulation. Psychological Bulletin, 139, 655–701. doi:10.1037/a0029531
4. Cattell R. B., Cattell A. K. S., (1949). Test of “g”: Culture fair. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.
5. Cohen J., (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York, NY: Routledge Academic.
6. Cohen J., (1994). The earth is round (p <.05). American Psychologist, 49, 997–1003.
7. Diener C. I., Dweck C. S., (1978). An analysis of learned helplessness: Continuous changes in performance, strategy, and achievement cognitions following failure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 451–462. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.36.5.451
8. Dweck C. S., (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41, 1040–1048. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.41.10.1040
9. Dweck C. S., (2000). Self-theories: Their role in motivation, personality, and development. East Sussex, England: Psychology Press.
10. Dweck C. S., (2002). Beliefs that make smart people dumb. In Sternberg R. J., (Ed.), Why smart people can be so stupid (pp. 24–41). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
11. Dweck C. S., (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. New York, NY: Ballantine Books.
12. Dweck C. S., (2008). Brainology: Transforming students’ motivation to learn. National Association of Independent Schools. Retrieved from https://www.stns.org/downloads/NAISBrainology.CarolDweck.pdf
13. Dweck C. S., (2009). Mindsets: Developing talent through a growth mindset. Olympic Coach, 21, 4–7.
14. Dweck C. S., (n.d.). What is mindset. Retrieved from https://mindsetonline.com/whatisit/about/
15. Dweck C. S., Leggett E. L., (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95, 256–273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256
16. Dweck C. S., Yeager D. S., (2019). Mindsets: A view from two eras. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14, 481–496. doi:10.1177/1745691618804166
17. Ekstrom R., French J., Harman H., Derman D., (1976). Kit of factor-referenced cognitive tests (Rev. ed.). Princeton, NJ: Educational Testing Service.
18. Elliot A. J., Church M. A., (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72, 218–232. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.72.1.218
19. Faul F., Erdfelder E., Lang A.-G., Buchner A., (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39, 175–191.
20. Good C., Rattan A., Dweck C. S., (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102, 700–717.
21. Lakens D., Scheel A. E., Isager P. M., (2018). Equivalence testing for psychological research: A tutorial. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science, 1, 259–269. doi:10.1177/2515245918770963
22. Li Y., Bates T. C., (2019). You can’t change your basic ability, but you work at things, and that’s how we get hard things done: Testing the role of growth mindset on response to setbacks, educational attainment, and cognitive ability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148, 1640–1655. doi:10.1037/xge0000669
23. Lykken D. T., (1968). Statistical significance in psychological research. Psychological Bulletin, 70, 151–159. doi:10.1037/h0026141
24. Mindset Works. (2017). Cultivating a growth mindset at home. Retrieved from https://www.mindsetworks.com/parents/
25. Moreau D., Macnamara B. N., Hambrick D. Z., (2018). Overstating the role of environmental factors in success: A cautionary note. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28, 28–33. doi:10.1177/0963721418797300
26. Mueller C. M., Dweck C. S., (1998). Praise for intelligence can undermine children’s motivation and performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 33–52. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.1.33
27. Payne S. C., Youngcourt S. S., Beaubien J. M. (2007). A meta-analytic examination of the goal orientation nomological net. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 128–150. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.92.1.128
28. Rattan A., Savani K., Chugh D., Dweck C. S., (2015). Leveraging mindsets to promote academic achievement: Policy recommendations. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 10, 721–726. doi:10.1177/1745691615599383
29. Raven J., Raven J. C., Court J. H. (1998). Manual for Raven’s progressive matrices and vocabulary scales. London, England: Pearson.
30. Richard F. D., Bond C. F., Jr. Stokes-Zoota J. J., (2003). One hundred years of social psychology quantitatively described. Review of General Psychology, 7, 331–363. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.4.331
31. Robins R. W., Pals J. L., (2002). Implicit self-theories in the academic domain: Implications for goal orientation, attributions, affect, and self-esteem change. Self and Identity, 1, 313–336. doi:10.1080/15298860290106805
32. Schäfer T., Schwarz M. A., (2019). The meaningfulness of effect sizes in psychological research: Differences between sub-disciplines and the impact of potential biases. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, Article 813. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00813
33. Sisk V. F., Burgoyne A. P., Sun J., Butler J. L., Macnamara B. N., (2018). To what extent and under which circumstances are growth mind-sets important to academic achievement? Two meta-analyses. Psychological Science, 29, 549–571. doi:10.1177/0956797617739704
34. Yeager D. S., Dweck C. S., (2012). Mindsets that promote resilience: When students believe that personal characteristics can be developed. Educational Psychologist, 47, 302–314. doi:10.1080/00461520.2012.722805