Activity theory and learning from digital games: Developing an analytical methodology

Digital Generations: Children, Young People, and the New Media

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 67-88

  Oliver, Martin ^a   Pelletier, Caroline ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85078641716     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (17)

1. Beavis, C. (1998). Computer games, culture and curriculum. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen: Taking literacy into the electronic age (pp. 234-255). London: Routledge.
2. Burn, A., & Parker, D. (2003). Analysing multimodal texts. London: Continuum.
3. Dawes, L., & Dumbleton, T. (2001). Computer games in education project. Retrieved July 15, 2004, from http://www.becta.org.uk/page_documents/research/cge/report.pdf
4. Egenfeldt-Nielsen, S. (2004). Practical barriers in using educational computer games, work in progress. Retrieved July 15, 2004, from http://www.it-c.dk/people/sen/papers/Practical%20barriers%20in%20using%20educational%20computer%20gamesJ).6.doc
5. Engestrom, Y. (2001). Expansive learning at work: Towards an activity theoretical recon-ceptualization. Journal of Education and Work, 14(1), 133-156.
6. Gander, S. (2000). Does learning occur through gaming? Electronic Journal of Instructional Science and Technology (E-JIST), 3(2), 28-43.
7. Gee, J. (2003). What video games have to teach us about learning and literacy. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
8. Kuutti, K. (1996). Activity theory as a potential framework for human computer interaction research. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 17-44). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
9. Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Quality in qualitative health research. In C. Pope & N. Mays (Eds.), Qualitative research in health care (pp. 65-74). Bristol: BMJ Books. Retrieved July 20, 2004, from http://www.bmjpg.com/qrhc/
10. McFarlane, A., Sparrowhawk, A., & Heald, Y. (2002). Report on the educational use of games: An exploration by TEEM on the contribution which games can make to the educational process. Cambridge: TEEM.
11. Nardi, B. A. (1996). Studying context: A comparison of activity theory, situated action models, and distributed cognition. In B. A. Nardi (Ed.), Context and consciousness: Activity theory and human-computer interaction (pp. 69-102). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
12. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital game-based learning. London: McGraw-Hill.
13. Roussou, M. (2003). Interactivity and learning: Examining young learners' activity within interactive virtual environments. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University College London.
14. Squire, K. (2002). Cultural framing of computer/video games. GameStudies, 2(1). Retrieved July 20, 2004, from http://www.gamestudies.org/0102/squire/
15. Vygotsky, L. (1978). Mind and society: The development of higher mental processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
16. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Williamson, B., & Facer, K. (2003). More than just a game: The implications for schools of children's computer games communities. Draft articles, NESTA Futurelab. Retrieved July 15, 2004, from urlhttp://www.nestafuturelab.org/research/draft_articles.htm