Scientific Opinion on the safety and efficacy of Lactobacillus pentosus (DSM 14025) as a silage additive for all animal species

EFSA Journal

Volumn 9, Issue 11, 2011, Pages

[No Author Info available]

Author keywords

ampicillin; antibiotic resistance; clindamycin; Lactobacillus pentosus; safety; silage additive; Technological additive; tetracycline

Indexed keywords

EID: 85078370217     PISSN: None     EISSN: 18314732     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2449     Document Type: Article

References (4)

1. Bennedsen M, Stuer-Lauridsen B, Danielsen M and Johansen E, 2011. Screening for antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence factors via genome sequencing. Applied and Environmental Microbiology. 77, 2785–2787.
2. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2007. Opinion of the Scientific Committee on a request from EFSA on the introduction of a Qualified Presumption of Safety (QPS) approach for assessment of selected microorganisms referred to EFSA. The EFSA Journal, 587, 1–16.
3. EFSA (European Food Safety Authority), 2008. Technical guidance prepared by the Panel on Additives and Products or Substances used in Animal Feed (FEEDAP) on the update of the criteria used in the assessment of bacterial resistance to antibiotics of human or veterinary importance. The EFSA Journal, 732, 1–15.
4. EFSA Panel on Biological Hazards (BIOHAZ), 2010. Scientific Opinion on the maintenance of the list of QPS biological agents intentionally added to food and feed (2010 update). EFSA Journal, 8(12):1944.