Methods for the analysis of change

Handbook of Personality Development

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 181-211

  Little, Todd D ^a   Bovaird, James A ^a   Slegers, David W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85077277771     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315805610-17     Document Type: Chapter

References (93)

1. Aber, M. S, & McArdle, J. J. (1991). Latent growth curve approaches to modeling the development of competence. In M. Chandler & M. Chapman (Eds.), Criteria for competence: Controversies in the conceptualization and assessment of children s abilities (pp. 231-258). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
2. Allison, E D. (1982). Discrete-time methods for the analysis of event histories. Sociological Methodology, 13, 61-98.
3. Allison, E D. (1984). Event history analysis. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
4. Allison, E D. (1995). Survival analysis using the SAS System: A practical Guide. Cary, NC: SAS Institute.
5. Andrich, D. (1985). Rasch measurement models. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
6. Bauer, D. (2003). Estimating multilevel linear models as structural equation models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 28, 135-167.
7. Bauer, D. J, & Curran E J. (2003a). Distributional assumptions of growth mixture models: Implications for overextraction of latent trajectory classes. Psychological Methods, 8, 338-363.
8. Bauer, D. J, & Curran E J. (2003b). Overextraction of latent trajectory classes: Much ado about nothing? Reply to Rindskopf (2003), Muthén (2003), and Cudeck and Henly (2003). Psychological Methods, 8, 384-393.
9. Bereiter, C. (1963). Some persisting dilemma in the measurement of change. In C. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change (pp. 3-20). Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.
10. Blossfeld, H. P, Hamerle, A., & Mayer, K. U. (1989). Event history analysis. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Blossfeld, H. E, & Rohwer, G. (2002). Techniques of event history modeling: New approaches to casual analysis (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
12. Box, G. E. R, Jenkins, G. M., & Reinsel, G. C. (1994). Time series analysis: Forecasting and control (3rd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
13. Box, G. E. P., & Pierce, D. A. (1970). Distribution of residual autocorrelations in autoregressive-integrated moving average time series models. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 65, 1509-1526.
14. Browne, M. W., & Arminger, G. (1995). Specification and estimation of meanand covariance-structure models. In G. Arminger, C. C. Clogg, & M. E. Sobel (Eds.), Handbook of statistical modeling for the social and behavioral sciences (pp. 311-359). New York: Plenum.
15. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1987). Application of hierarchical linear models to assessing change. Psychological Bulletin, 101, 147-158.
16. Bryk, A. S., & Raudenbush, S. W. (1992). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
17. Burkholder, G. J., & Harlow, L. L. (2003). An illustration of a longitudinal cross-lagged design for larger structural equation models. Structural Equation Modeling, 10, 465-486.
18. Cattell, R. B. (1952). The three basic factor-analytic research designs—their interrelations and derivatives. Psychological Bulletin, 49, 499-551.
19. Cattell, R. B. (1963). The structuring of change by Pand incremental Rtechnique. In C. W. Harris (Ed.), Problems in measuring change (pp. 167-198). Madison: University of Wisconsin.
20. Cattell, R. B. (1988). The data box. In J. R. Nesselroade & R. B. Cattell (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (pp. 67-128). New York: Plenum.
21. Collins, L. M. (1991). The measurement of dynamic latent variables in longitudinal aging research: Quantifying adult development. Experimental Aging Research, 17, 13-20.
22. Collins, L. M., & Wugalter, S. E. (1992). Latent class models for stage-sequential dynamic latent variable. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 27, 131-157.
23. Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 34, 187-202.
24. Cudeck, R., & duToit, S. (2001). Mixed-effects models in the study of individual differences with repeated measures data. Multivariate behavioral research, 31, 371-403.
25. Cudeck, R., & Henley, S. J. (2003). A realistic perspective on pattern representation in growth data: Comment on Bauer and Curran (2003). Psychological Methods, 8, 378-383.
26. Curran, P (2004). Have multilevel models been structural equation models all along? Multivariate Behavioral Research, 38, 529-569.
27. Dielman, T. E. (1989). Pooled cross-sectional and time series data analysis. New York: Marcel-Dekker.
28. Dempster, A. E, Laird, N. M., & Rubin, D. B. (1977). Maximum likelihood from incomplete data via the EM algorithm. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 44, 1-38.
29. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., Okut, H., Strycker, L.A., & Li, F. (2002). An extension of the general latent variable growth modeling framework to four leveis of the hierarchy. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 303-326.
30. Duncan, T. E., Duncan, S. C., Strycker, L. A., Li, F., & Alpert, A. (1999). An introduction to latent variable growth curve modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
31. Embretson, S. E. (1991). A multidimensional latent trait model for measuring learning and change. Psychometrika, 56, 495-516.
32. Embretson, S. E. (1998, August). Modifiability in lifespan development: Multidimensional Rasch model for learning and change. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Psychological Association, San Francisco, CA.
33. Embretson, S.E., & Reise, S.E (2000). Item response theory for psychologists. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
34. Ferrer, E., Hamagami, F., & McArdle, J. (2004). Modeling latent growth curves with incomplete data using different types of structural equation modeling and multilevel software. Structural Equation Modeling, 11, 452-483.
35. Fischer, G. (1995). Derivations of the Rasch model. In G. H. Fischer & I. W. Molenar (Eds.), Rasch models: Foundations, recent developments and applications (pp. 15-30). New York: Springer-Verlag.
36. Glass, G. V., Willson, V. L., & Gottman, J. M. (1975). Design and analysis of time series experiments. Boulder, CO: Colorado Associate University Press.
37. Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H., & Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
38. Hawley, E H., & Little, T. D. (2003). Modeling intraindividual variability and change in bio-behavioral developmental processes. In B. Pugesek, A. Tomer, & A. von Eye (Eds.), Structural equations modeling: Applications in ecological and evolutionary biology research (pp. 143-170). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
39. Heck, R. H., & Thomas, S. L. (2000). An introduction to multilevel modeling techniques (pp.154-180). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
40. Hershberger, S. L. (1998). Dynamic factor analysis. In G. A. Marcoulides (Ed.), Modera methods for business research (pp. 217-249). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
41. Hertzog, C., Dixon, R. A., Hultsch, D. F., & MacDonald, S. W. (2003). Latent change models of adult cognition: Are changes in processing speed and working memory associated with changes in episodic memory? Psychology and Aging, 18, 755-769.
42. Hewitt, P L., & Flett, G. L. (1991). Perfection in the self and social contexts: Conceptualization, assessment and association with psychopathology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 456-470.
43. Hox, J. J. (2000). Multilevel models of grouped and longitudinal data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches and specific examples (pp. 219-240). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
44. Hox, J. (2002). Multilevel analysis: Techniques and applications (pp. 225-262). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
45. Hsiao, C. (1986). Analysis of panei data. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
46. Jones, J. C., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1990). Multivariate, replicated, single-subject, repeated measures designs and P-technique factor analysis: A review of intraindividual change studies. Experimental Aging Research, 16, 171-183.
47. Kalbfleisch, T. D., & Prentice, R. L. (2002). The statistical analysis of failure time data (2nd ed.). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
48. Klein, J. E, & Moeschberger, M. L. (1997). Survival analysis: Techniques for censored and truncated data. New York: Springer-Verlag.
49. Kolen, M.J., & Brennan, R. L. (1995). Test equatingmethods and practices. New York: Springer-Verlag.
50. Kreft, I. G. G., de Leeuw, J., & Aiken, L. A. (1995). The effect of different forms of centering in hierarchical linear models. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 30, 1-21.
51. Li, F., Duncan, T. E., & Duncan, S. C. (2001). Latent growth modeling of longitudinal data: Afinite growth mixture modeling approach. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 493-530.
52. Linn, R. L. (1993). Linking results of distinct assessments. Applied Measurement in Education, 6, 83-102.
53. Little, T. D. (1997). Mean and covariance structures (MACS) analyses of cross-cultural data: Fractical and theoretical issues. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 32, 53-76.
54. Little, T. D., Lindenberger, U., & Maier, H. (2000). Selectivity and generalizability in longitudinal research: On the effects of continuers and dropouts. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches and specific examples (pp. 187-200). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
55. Little, T. D., Lindenberger, U., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1999). On selecting indicators for multivariate measurement and modeling with latent variables: When “good” indicators are bad and “bad” indicators are good. Psychological Methods, 4, 192-211.
56. Little, T. D, & Slegers, D. W. (2005). Factor analysis: Multiple groups. In B. S. Everitt & D. C. Howell (Eds.), Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral Science (pp. 617-623). Wiley.
57. Little, T. D., Card, N. A., Slegers, D. W. & Ledford, E. C. (in press). Modeling contextuai effects with multiple-group MACS models. In T. D. Little, J. A. Bovaird, & N. A. Card (Eds.), Modeling ecological and contextuai effects in longitudinal studies of human development (pp. 000-000). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
58. Lord, F. M, & Novick, M. R. (1968). Statistical theories of mental test scores. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
59. McArdle, J. J. (1988). Dynamic but structural equation modelingofrepeated measures data. In R. B. Cattell &J. Nesselroade (Eds.), Handbook of multivariate experimental psychology (2nd ed, pp. 561-614). New York: Plenum.
60. McArdle, J. J. (2001). A latent difference score approach to longitudinal dynamic structural analyses. In R. Cudeck, S. du Toit, & D. Sõrbom (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: Present and future (pp. 342-380). Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
61. McArdle, J.J, & Anderson, E. (1990). Latent variable growth models for research on aging. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (3rd ed, pp. 21-44). New York: Academic Press.
62. McArdle, J. J., & Bell, R. Q. (2000). An introduction to latent growth models for developmental data. In T. D. Little, K. U. Schnabel, & J. Baumert (Eds.), Modeling longitudinal and multilevel data: Practical issues, applied approaches and specific examples (pp. 69-108). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
63. McArdle, J. J, & Hamagami, E. (2001). Latent difference score structural models for linear dynamic analyses with incomplete longitudinal data. In L. Collins & A. Sayer (Eds.), Methods for the analysis of change (pp. 139-175). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
64. McArdle, J.J, & Nesselroade, J. R. (1994). Structuring data to study development and change. In S. H. Cohen & H. W. Reese (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Methodological innovations (pp. 223-267). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
65. McArdle, J. J, & Nesselroade, J. R. (2002). Growth curve analysis in contemporary psychological research. In J. Schinka &W. Velicer (Eds.), Comprehensive handbook of psychology: Volume2. Research methods in psychology (pp. 447-480). New York: Wiley.
66. Meiser, T, & Ohrt, B. (1996). Modeling structure and chance in transitions: Mixed latent partial Markov-chain models. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21, 91-109.
67. Meredith, W. (1993). Measurement invariance, factor analysis and factorial invariance. Psychometrika, 58, 525-543.
68. Meredith, W, & Tisak, J. (1990). Latent curve analysis. Psychometrika, 55, 107-122.
69. Mislevy, R. J. (1992). Linking educational assessments: Concepts, issues, methods, and prospects. Princeton, NJ: ETS Policy Information Center.
70. Molenaar, P C. M. (1985). A dynamic factor model for the analysis of multivariate time series data. Psychometrika, 57, 333-349.
71. Molenaar, P C. M. (1994). Dynamic latent variable models in developmental psychology. In A. von Eye &C. C. Clogg (Eds.), Latent variables analysis (pp. 155-180). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
72. Molenaar, P C. M, De Gooijer, J. G, & Schmitz, B. (1992). Dynamic factor analysis of nonstationary multivariate time series. Psychometrika, 57, 333-349.
73. Muthén, B. (2001). Latent variable mixture modeling. In G. A. Marcoulides &R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), New developments and techniques in structural equation modeling (pp. 1-33). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
74. Muthén, B. (2003). Statistical and substantive checking in growth mixture modeling: Comment on Bauer and Curran (2003). Psychological Methods, 8, 369-377.
75. Muthén, B, & Shedden, K. (1999). Finite mixture modeling with mixture ou tcomes using the EM algorithm. Biometrics, 55, 463-469.
76. Nagin, D. S. (1999). Analyzing developmental trajectories: A semi-parametric, group-based approach. Psychological Methods, 4, 139-157.
77. Nagin, D. S., & Tremblay, R. E. (2001). Analyzing developmental trajectories of distinct but related behaviors: A group-based method. Psychological Methods, 6, 18-34.
78. Nesselroade, J. R., & Boker, S. M. (1994). Assessing constancy and change. In T. F. Heatherton & J. L. Weinberger (Eds.), Can personality change? (pp. 121-147). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
79. Nesselroade, J. R., McArdle, J. J., Aggen, S. H., & Meyers, J. (2001). Dynamic factor analysis models for representing process in multivariate time-series. In D. M. Moskowitz & S. L. Hershberger (Ed.), Modeling intraindividual variability with repeated measures data: Methods and applications (pp. 235-265). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
80. Nesselroade, J. R., & Molenaar, P C. M. (1999). Pooling lagged covariance structures based on short, multivariate time series for dynamic factor analysis. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Statistical strategies for small sample research (pp. 224-251). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
81. Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods (2nd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
82. Raykov, T. Y., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2000). A first course in structural equation modeling. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
83. Rindskopf, D. (2003). Mixture or homogeneous: Comment on Bauer and Curran (2003). Psychological Methods, 8, 364-368.
84. Rogosa, D. R., & Willett, J. B. (1983). Demonstrating the reliability of the difference score in the measurement of change. Journal of Educational Measurement, 20, 335-343.
85. Rovine, M. J., & Molenaar, P C. M. (1998). The covariance between levei and shape in the latent growth curve model with estimated basis vector coefficients. Methods of Psychological Research Online, 3(2), 95-107.
86. Thissen, D., & Wainer, H. (Eds.). (2001). Testscoring. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
87. van Buuren, S. (1997). Fitting ARMA time series by structural equation models. Psychometrika, 62, 215-236
88. Velicer, W. F., & Fava, J. L. (2003). Time series analysis. In W. F. Velicer & J. A. Schinka (Ed.), Handbook of psychology: Research methods in psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 581-606). New York: Wiley.
89. Willett, J. B., & Sayer, A. G. (1994). Using covariance structure analysis to detect correlates and predictors of individual change over time. Psychological Bulletin, l16, 363-381.
90. Willett, J. B., & Singer, J. D. (1993). Investigating onset, cessation, relapse, and recovery: Why you should, and how you can, use discrete-time survival analysis to examine event occurrence. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 61, 952-965.
91. Wright, B. D., & Stone, M. H. (1979). Best test design: Rasch measurement. Chicago: Mesa Press.
92. Wood, P, & Brown, D. (1994). The study of intraindividual differences by means of dynamic factor models: Rationale, implementation, and interpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 166-186.
93. Yamaguchi, K. (1991). Event history analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.