Disparities Research, Disparities Researchers, and Health Equity

JAMA - Journal of the American Medical Association

Volumn 323, Issue 3, 2020, Pages 211-212

  Carnethon, Mercedes R ^a   Kershaw, Kiarri N ^a   Kandula, Namratha R ^a  

^a NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLACK PERSON; CAUCASIAN; ETHNICITY; FUNDING; HEALTH DISPARITY; HEALTH EQUITY; HUMAN; LIFE EXPECTANCY; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NOTE; PEER REVIEW; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RACE DIFFERENCE; SCIENTIST; STUDY DESIGN; UNITED STATES; CULTURAL DIVERSITY; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HEALTH CARE DISPARITY; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; PERSONNEL; PROCEDURES; RACISM; STATISTICAL BIAS;

AFRICAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; BIAS; CULTURAL DIVERSITY; EUROPEAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; HEALTH EQUITY; HEALTHCARE DISPARITIES; HUMANS; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; RACISM; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85076485852     PISSN: 00987484     EISSN: 15383598     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2019.19329     Document Type: Note

References (9)

1. Jones NL, Breen N, Das R, Farhat T, Palmer R. Cross-cutting themes to advance the science of minority health and health disparities. Am J Public Health. 2019; 109 (S1): S21-S24. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2019.304950 30699031
2. Ginther DK, Schaffer WT, Schnell J, Race, ethnicity, and NIH research awards. Science. 2011; 333 (6045): 1015-1019. doi: 10.1126/science.1196783 21852498
3. Hoppe TA, Litovitz A, Willis KA, Topic choice contributes to the lower rate of NIH awards to African-American/black scientists. Sci Adv. 2019; 5 (10):
4. Research Topic Contributes to Persistent Gap in NIH Research Grants to Black Scientists. Bethesda, MD: National Institutes of Health; 2019.
5. NIH Center for Scientific Review. How Scientists Are Selected to Be Members of a Chartered Review Group. https://public.csr.nih.gov/ForReviewers/BecomeAReviewer/CharteredReviewers. Accessed October 30, 2019.
6. Valantine HA, Collins FS. National Institutes of Health addresses the science of diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015; 112 (40): 12240-12242. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1515612112 26392553
7. Pritlove C, Juando-Prats C, Ala-Leppilampi K, Parsons JA. The good, the bad, and the ugly of implicit bias. Lancet. 2019; 393 (10171): 502-504. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32267-0 30739671
8. Gaucher D, Friesen J, Kay AC. Evidence that gendered wording in job advertisements exists and sustains gender inequality. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011; 101 (1): 109-128. doi: 10.1037/a0022530 21381851
9. Centola D, Becker J, Brackbill D, Baronchelli A. Experimental evidence for tipping points in social convention. Science. 2018; 360 (6393): 1116-1119. doi: 10.1126/science.aas8827 29880688