EU issue salience and domestic party competition

Issue Salience in International Politics

Volumn , Issue , 2011, Pages 173-187

  De Vries, Catherine E ^a   Van De Wardt, Marc ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85076172022     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203816950-21     Document Type: Chapter

References (40)

1. Achen, C.H. (2000) ‘Why Lagged Dependent Variables Can Suppress the Explanatory Power of Other Independent Variables’, paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Political Methodology Section of the American Political Science Association, Los Angeles, CA, July 2000.
2. Anderson, C.J. and Kaltenthaler, K.C. (1996) ‘The Dynamics of Public Opinion toward European Integration, 1973-93’, European Journal of International Relations, 2: 175-99.
3. Beck, N., and Katz, J.J. (1995) ‘What To Do (and Not To Do) with Time-Series-Cross-Section Data in Comparative Politics’, American Political Science Review, 89: 634-47.
4. Beck, N., and Katz, J.J -(1996) ‘Nuisance or Substance: Specifying and Estimating Times-Series CrossSection Models’, in J.R. Freeman (ed.)PoliticalAnalysis, Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
5. Belanger, E. (2003) ‘Issue Ownership by Canadian Political Parties since 1953’, Canadian Journal of Political Science, 36: 539-58.
6. Budge, I. and Farlie, D. (1983) Explaining and Predicting Elections: Issue Effects and Party Strategies in Twenty-Three Democracies, London: Allen and Unwin.
7. Carrubba, C. (2001) ‘The Electoral Connection in European Union Politics’, Journal of Politics, 63: 141-58.
8. Crum, B. (2007) ‘Party Stances in the Referendums on the EU Constitution: Causes and Consequences of Competition and Collusion’, European Union Politics, 8: 61-82.
9. De Vries, C.E. (2007) ‘Sleeping Giant: Fact or Fairytale? How European Integration Affects Vote Choice in National Elections’, European Union Politics, 8: 363-85.
10. De Vries, C.E -(2010) ‘EU Issue Voting: Asset or Liability? How European Integration Affects Parties Electoral Fortunes’, European Union Politics, 11: 89-117.
11. De Vries, C.E. and Edwards, E.E. (2009) ‘Taking Europe to Its Extremes: Extremist Parties and Public Euroskepticism’, Party Politics, 15: 5-28.
12. Downs, A. (1957) An Economic Theory ofDemocracy, New York, NY: Harper and Row.
13. Eichenberg, R. and Dalton, R.J. (2007) ‘Post-Maastricht Blues: The Transformation of Citizen Support for European Integration, 1973-2004’, Acta Politica, 42: 128-52.
14. Enelow, J.M. and Hinich, M.J. (1984) The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
15. Evans, G. (1998) ‘Euroscepticism and Conservative Electoral Support: How an Asset Became a Liability’, British Journal of Political Science, 28: 573-90.
16. Greene, W.H. (1990) EconometricAnalysis, New York, NY: Macmillan.
17. Hobolt, S.B. (2009) Europe in Question: Referendums on European Integration, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Hooghe, L. (2003) ‘Europe Divided? Elites vs. Public Opinion on European Integration’, European Union Politics, 4: 281-305.
19. Hooghe, L. and Marks, G. (2009) ‘A Postfunctionalist Theory of European Integration: From Permissive Consensus to Constraining Dissensus’, British Journal of Political Science, 39: 1-23.
20. Hooghe, L., Marks, G. and Wilson, C.J. (2002) ‘Does Left/Right Structure Party Positions on European Integration?’, Comparative Political Studies, 35: 965-89.
21. Hooghe, L., Bakker, R., Brigevich, A., De Vries, C.E., Edwards, E.E., Marks, G., Rovny J. and Steenbergen, M.R. (forthcoming) ‘Reliability and Validity of Measuring Party Positions: The Chapel Hill Expert Surveys of2002 and 2006’, European Journal of Political Research.
22. Marks, G. and Wilson, C.J. (2000) ‘The Past and the Present: A Cleavage Theory of Party Response to European Integration’, British Journal of Political Science, 30: 433-59.
23. Marks, G., Wilson, C.J. and Ray, L. (2002) ‘National Political Parties and European Integration’, American Journal ofPolitical Science, 46: 585-94.
24. Marks, G., Hooghe, L., Steenbergen, M.R. and Bakker, R. (2007) ‘Cross-Validating Data on Party Positioning on European Integration’, Electoral Studies, 26: 23-38.
25. Meguid, B. (2005) ‘Competition between Unequals: The Role of Mainstream Party Strategy and Niche Party Success’, American Political Science Review, 99: 347-60.
26. Netjes, C.E. and Binnema, H.A. (2007) ‘The Salience of the European Integration Issue: Three Data Sources Compared’, Electoral Studies, 26: 39-49.
27. Petrocik, J. (1996) ‘Issue Ownership in Presidential Elections, with a 1980 Case Study’, American Journal of Political Science, 40: 825-50.
28. Plumper, T., Troeger, V.E. and Manow, P. (2005) ‘Panel Data Analysis in Comparative Politics: Linking Method to Theory’, European Journal of Political Research, 44: 327-54.
29. Rabinowitz, G. and MacDonald, S.E. (1989) ‘A Directional Theory of Issue Voting’, American Political Science Review, 83: 93-121.
30. Ray, L. (1999) ‘Measuring Party Orientations towards European Integration: Results from an Expert Survey’, European Journal of Political Research, 36: 283-306.
31. Ray, L -(2003) ‘When Parties Matter: The Conditional Influence ofParty Positions on Voter Opinion about European Integration’, Journal of Politics, 65: 978-94.
32. Siaroff, A. (2000) Comparative European Party Systems: An Analysis of Parliamentary Elections since 1945, New York, NY: Garland Publishing.
33. Steenbergen, M.R. and Marks, G. (2004) ‘Introduction: Models of Political Conflict in the European Union’, in G. Marks and M.R. Steenbergen (eds) European Integration and Political Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Steenbergen, M.R. and Marks, G -(2007) ‘Evaluating Expert Surveys’, European Journal ofPolitical Research, 46: 347-66.
35. Steenbergen, M.R. and Scott, D. (2004) ‘Contesting Europe? The Salience of European Integration as a Party Issue’, in G. Marks and M.R. Steenbergen (eds)European Integration and Political Conflict: Parties, Voters, Interest Groups, and Social Movements, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
36. Steenbergen, M.R., Edwards, E.E. and De Vries, C.E. (2007) ‘Who’s Cueing Whom? Mass-Elite Linkages and the Future of European Integration’, European Union Politics, 8: 13-35.
37. Stokes, D. (1963) ‘Spatial Models and Party Competition’, American Political Science Review, 57: 368-77.
38. Taggart, P. (1998) ‘A Touchtone of Dissent: Euroskepticism in Contemporary Western European Party Systems’, European Journal ofPolitical Research, 33: 363-88.
39. Tavits, M. (2008) ‘Policy Positions, Issue Importance and Party Competition in New Democracies’, Comparative Political Studies, 41: 48-72.
40. Van der Eijk, C. and Franklin, M.N. (2004) ‘Potential for Contestation on European Matters at National Elections in Europe’, in G. Marks and M.R. Steenbergen (eds) European Integration and Political Conflict, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press