Altmetrics as traces of the computerization of the research process

Theories of Informetrics and Scholarly Communication

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 360-371

  Moed, Henk F ^a  

^a SAPIENZA UNIVERSITY OF ROME   (Italy)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85075953963     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1515/9783110308464-021     Document Type: Chapter

References (21)

1. Altmetric.com (2014). www.altmetric.com.
2. Bar-Ilan, J. (2014). Evaluating the individual researcher - adding an altmetric perspective. Research Trends, 37. Retrieved from http://www.researchtrends.com/issue-37-june-2014/evaluating-the-individual-researcher/
3. Cronin, B. (2014). Meta Life. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 65(3), 431-432.
4. Cronin, B. & Sugimoto, C. R. (Eds.) (2015). Scholarly metrics under the microscope: From citation analysis to academic auditing. Medford, NJ: Information Today, Inc./ASIST, pp. 976.
5. Elliott, M. S. & Kraemer, K. L. (2009). Computerization Movements and the Diffusion of Technological Innovations. In M. Elliott & K. Kraemer (Eds.), Computerization Movements and Technology Diffusion: From Mainframes to Ubiquitous Computing (p. 3-41), Medford, New Jersey: Information Today, Inc.
6. Francis Bacon. (n.d.) In Wikipedia. Retrieved August 25, 2014 from http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Francis_Bacon
7. Geisler, E. (2000). The Metrics of Science and Technology. Westport, CT, USA: Greenwood Publishing Group.
8. Gorraiz, J., Gumpenberger, C., & Schlögl, C. (2013). Differences and similarities in usage versus citation behaviours observed for five subject areas. In Proceedings of the 14th ISSI Conference Vol. 1, 519-535. http://www.issi2013.org/Images/ISSI_Proceedings_Volume_I.pdf.
9. Guerrero-Bote, V. P., & Moya-Anegón, F. (2014). Relationship between Downloads and Citations at Journal and Paper Levels, and the Influence of Language. Scientometrics, 101(2), 1043-1065.
10. Halevi, G. & Moed, H. (2014). 10 years of research impact: top cited papers in Scopus 2001-2011. Research Trends, 38. Retrieved from http://www.researchtrends.com/issue-38- september-2014/10-years-of-research-impact/
11. Kurtz, M. J., Eichhorn, G., Accomazzi, A., Grant, C., Demleitner, M., Murray, S. S., Martimbeau, N., & Elwell, B. (2005). The bibliometric properties of article readership information. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 56, 111-128.
12. Kurtz, M. J., & Bollen, J. (2010). Usage Bibliometrics. Annual Review of Information Science and Technology, 44, 3-64.
13. Moed, H. F. & Halevi, G. (2015a). The Multidimensional Assessment of Scholarly Research Impact. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, to be published.
14. Moed, H. F. & Halevi, G. (2015b). On full text download and citation distributions in scientificscholarly journals. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, to be published.
15. Nielsen, M. (2011). Reinventing Discovery: The New Era of Networked Science.. Princeton University Press.
16. NISO (National Information Standards Organization) (2014). NISO Altmetrics Standards Project White Paper. Retrieved from http://www.niso.org/apps/group_public/download.php/ 13295/niso_altmetrics_white_paper_draft_v4.pdf
17. Open Science. (n.d.) In Wikipedia. Retrieved August 22, 2014 from http://en.wikipedia.org/ wiki/Open_science
18. Priem, J., Taraborelli, D., Groth, P. & Neylon, C. (2010). Altmetrics: A Manifesto. Retrieved from http://altmetrics.org/manifesto/
19. Shema, H., Bar-Ilan, J. & & Thelwall, M. Scholarly blogs are a promising altmetric source. Research Trends, 37. Retreived from http://www.researchtrends.com/issue-37-june-2014/scholarly-blogs-are-a-promising-altmetric-source/
20. Sugimoto, C. (2014). Private communication.
21. Thelwall, M. (2014). A brief history of altmetrics. Research Trends, 37. Retrieved from http://www.researchtrends.com/issue-37-june-2014/a-brief-history-of-altmetrics/