Measures of Lineup Fairness: Do They Postdict Identification Accuracy?

Applied Cognitive Psychology

Volumn 13, Issue 1 SUPPL., 1999, Pages

  Lindsay, R C L ^a   Smith, Steven M ^b   Pryke, Sean ^b  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0002368646     PISSN: 08884080     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1099-0720(199911)13:1+3.3.co;2-o     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Brigham, J. C. and Brandt, C. C. (1992). Measuring lineup fairness: Mock witness responses vs. direct evaluations of lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 16, 475-489.
2. Brigham, J. C. and Pfieffer, J. E. (1994). Evaluating lineup fairness. In D. F. Ross, J. D. Read and M. P. Toglia (Eds.), Adult eyewitness testimony: Current trends and developments (pp. 201-222). New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. Brigham, J. C., Ready, D. J. and Speir, S. A. (1990). Standards for evaluating the fairness of photograph lineups. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 11, 149-163.
4. Doob, A. N. and Kirshenbaum, H. M. (1973). Bias in police lineups-partial remembering. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 1, 287-293.
5. Lindsay, R. C. L. (1999). Eyewitness evidence. In G. Chayko (Ed), Forensic Evidence in Canada (2nd edn) (pp. 157-211). Toronto: Canada Law Book.
6. Lindsay, R. C. L. and Bellinger, K. Alternatives to the sequential lineup: The importance of controlling the pictures. Journal of Applied Psychology, (in press).
7. Lindsay, R. C. L. and Wells, G. L. (1980). What price justice? Exploring the relationship of lineup fairness to identification accuracy. Law and Human Behaviour, 4, 303-313.
8. Lindsay, R. C. L. and Wells, G. L. (1985). Improving eyewitness identifications from lineups: Simultaneous versus sequential lineup presentations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 70, 556-564.
9. Malpass, R. S. (1981). Effective size and defendant bias in eyewitness identification lineups. Law and Human Behavior, 5, 299-309.
10. Malpass, R. S. and Devine, P. G. (1983). Measuring the fairness of eyewitness identification lineups. In S. M. A. Lloyd-Bostock and B. R. Clifford (Eds.), Evaluating witness evidence (pp. 81-102). Chichester: Wiley.
11. Tredoux, C. (1998). Statistical inference on measures of lineup fairness. Law and Human Behavior, 22, 217-237.
12. Wells, G. L. (1993). What do we know about eyewitness identification? American Psychologist, 48, 553-571.
13. Wells, G. L., Leippe, M. R. and Ostrom, T. M. (1979). Guidelines for empirically assessing the fairness of a lineup. Law and Human Behavior, 3, 285-293.
14. Wells, G. L., Rydell, S. M. and Seelau, E. P. (1993). The selection of distractors for eyewitness lineups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 835-844.
15. Wells, G. L., Small, M., Penrod, S., Malpass, R. S., Fulero, S. M. and Brimacombe, C. A. E. (1998). Eyewitness identification procedures: Recommendations for lineups and photo-spreads. Law and Human Behavior, 23, 603-647.
16. Wogalter, M. S., Malpass, R. S. and Berger, M. A. (1993). How police officers construct lineups: A national survey. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. Santa Monica, CA: Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, p. 640-644.