Enhancing academic language proficiency in a Spanish immersion classroom

Heritage Language Education: A New Field Emerging

Volumn , Issue , 2017, Pages 289-300

  Cohen, Andrew D ^a   Gómez, Tania ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85075311287     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315092997-21     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Allen, P., Swain, M., Harley, B., & Cummins, J. (1990). Aspects of classroom treatment: Towards a more comprehensive view of second language education. In B. Harley, P. Allen, J. Cummins, & M. Swain (Eds.), The development of second language proficiency (pp. 57–81). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
2. Broner, M. (2001). Impact of interlocutor and task on first and second language use in a Spanish immersion program (CARLA Working Paper #18). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition.
3. California State Department of Education (1984). Studies on immersion education: A collection for United States educators. Sacramento, CA: Publication Sales, California State Department of Education.
4. Cohen, A. D. (1998). Strategies in learning and using a second language. Harlow, England: Longman.
5. Cohen, A. D. & Gómez, T. (2004). Enhancing academic language in a fifth-grade Spanish immersion classroom (CARLA Working Paper #24). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition. Retrieved August 19, 2007 from http://www.carla.umn.edu/bibliography/documents/cohen_gomez.pdf
6. Cohen, A. D. & Oxford, R. L. (2001a). Learning Style Survey for Young Learners: Evaluating your Own Learning Styles. Experimental measure. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition. Retrieved August 9, 2005, from http://www.carla.umn.edu/about/profiles/CohenPapers/Young_Style_Survey.doc
7. Cohen, A. D. & Oxford, R. L. (2001b). Young Learners’ Language Strategies Survey. Experimental measure. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, Center for Advanced Research on Language Acquisition. Retrieved August 9, 2005, from http://www.carla.umn.edu/about/profiles/CohenPapers/Young_Lg_Strat_Srvy.doc
8. Cohen, A. D., & Swain, M. (1976). Bilingual education: The ‘immersion’ model in the North American context. TESOL Quarterly, 10, 45–53.
9. Cummins, J. (1991). Interdependence of first- and second language proficiency in bilingual children. In Bialystok E. (Ed.), Language processing in bilingual children. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Day, E., & Shapson, S. (1991). Integrating formal and functional approaches to language teaching in French immersion: An experimental study. Language Learning, 41(1), 25–58.
11. de Courcy, M. C. (1993). Making sense of the Australian French immersion classroom. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 14(3), 173–185.
12. de Courcy, M. C. (2002). Learners’ experiences of immersion education. Clevedon, England: Multilingual Matters.
13. Félix-Brasdefer, C. (2001). Exploring the grammatical performance of dual immersion students at the end of fifth grade. Paper presented at University of Minnesota.
14. Fortune, T. (2001). Understanding immersion students’ oral language use as a mediator of social interaction in the classroom. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
15. Genesee, F. (1987). Learning through two languages: Studies of immersion and bilingual education. Cambridge, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
16. Guerrero, M. C. M. de. (2005). Inner speech – L2: Thinking words in a second language. New York: Springer.
17. Harley, B. (1989). Functional grammar in French immersion: A classroom experiment. Applied Linguistics, 10(3), 331–359.
18. Lapkin, S., Swain, M., & Shapson, S. (1990). French immersion research agenda for the 90’s. Canadian Modern Language Review, 46(4), 638–667.
19. Laplante, B. (2000). Apprendre en sciences, c’est apprendre _ «parler sciences»: Des élèves de l’immersion nous parlent des réactions chimiques. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 57(2), 245–271.
20. Lyster, R. (1994). The eff ect of functional-analytic teaching on aspects of French immersion students’ sociolinguistic competence. Applied Linguistics, 15(3), 263–387.
21. Swain, M. (1996). Integrating language and content in immersion classrooms: Research perspectives. Canadian Modern Language Review, 52(4), 529–549.
22. Swain, M. (2000). The output hypothesis and beyond: Mediating acquisition through collaborative dialogue. In J. P. Lantolf (Ed.), Sociocultural theory and second language learning (pp. 97–114). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
23. Tomlinson, B. (2000). Talking to yourself: The role of the inner voice in language learning. Applied Language Learning, 11(1), 123–154.