Effects of contingent tone on concurrent schedule performance at different deprivation levels

European Journal of Behavior Analysis

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 1-8

  Reed, Phil ^a   Yoshino, Toshihiko ^a  

^a SWANSEA UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85073542409     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2377729X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15021149.2005.11434258     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Alsop, B., & Elliffe, D. (1988). Concurrent-schedule performance: Effects of relative and overall reinforcer rate. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 21–36.
2. Azrin, N.H., Holz, W.C., & Hake, D (1963). Fixed-ratio punishment. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 6, 141–148.
3. Baum, W.M. (1979). Matching, undermatching and overmatching in studies of choice. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 32, 269–281.
4. Davison, M. (1988). Concurrent schedules: Interaction of reinforcer frequency and reinforcer duration. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 49, 339–349.
5. de Villiers, P.A. (1980). Toward a quantitative theory of punishment. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 33, 15–25.
6. de Villiers, P.A. (1982). Toward a quantitative theory of punishment. In M.L. Commons, R.J. Herrnstein, & H. Rachlin (Eds.), Quantitative analyses of behavior. Vol. II: Matching and maximizing accounts (pp. 327–344). Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
7. Fantino, E., Squires, N., Delbrück, N., & Peterson, C. (1972). Choice behavior and the accessibility of the reinforcer. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 18, 35–43.
8. Farley, J. (1980). Reinforcement and punishment effects in concurrent schedules: A test of two models. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 33, 311–326.
9. Kelly, M.L., & McCain A.P. (1995). Promoting Academic Performance in Inattentive Children: The Relative Efficacy of School-Home Notes With and Without Response Cost. Behavior Modification, 19, 76–85.
10. Howell, D.C. (1992). Statistical methods for psychology (2nd ed.). Boston, MA: PWS-KENT.
11. MacDonald, L., & Baron, A. (1971). Recovery from punishment as a function of deprivation level. Psychonomic Science, 13, 53–54.
12. McSweeney, F.K. (1975). Concurrent schedule responding as a function of body weight. Animal Learning and Behavior, 3, 264–270.
13. Ploog, B.O., & Zeigler, H.P. (1997). Key-peck probability and topography in a concurrent variable-interval variable-interval schedule with food and water reinforcers. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 67, 109–129.
14. Reed, P. (2001a). Human schedule performance with hypothetical monetary reinforcement. European Journal of Behaviour Analysis, 2, 245–254.
15. Reed, P. (2001b). Human response rates and causality judgments on schedules of reinforcement. Learning and Motivation, 32, 332–348.
16. Reed, P. (2001c). Schedules of reinforcement as determinants of human causality judgments and response rates. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 27, 187–195.
17. Reed, P., Collinson, T., & Nokes, T. (1995). Aversive properties of auditory stimuli. Learning and Motivation, 26, 101–115.
18. Reed, P., & Yoshino, T. (2001). The effect of response-dependent tones on the acquisition of concurrent behavior in rats. Learning and Motivation, 32, 255–273.
19. Robinson, J.K. (1992). Quantitative analyses of choice in rat and pigeon. Psychological Record, 42, 437–445.
20. Taylor, R., & Davison, M. (1983). Sensitivity to reinforcement in concurrent arithmetic and exponential schedules. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 39, 191–198.
21. Wearden, J.H., & Burgess, I.S. (1982). Matching since Baum (1979). Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 38, 339–348.
22. Yoshino, T. (1986). Choice behavior under a punishing situation in rats. Unpublished master’s dissertation. Waseda University, Tokyo (in Japanese).