Human Schedule Performance with Hypothetical Monetary Reinforcement

European Journal of Behavior Analysis

Volumn 2, Issue 2, 2001, Pages 225-234

  Reed, Phil ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952816706     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2377729X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15021149.2001.11434197     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Allan, L.G., (1980). A note on measurement of contingency between two binary variables in judgment tasks. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 15, 147–149.
2. Baum, W.M. (1993). Performances on ratio and interval schedules of reinforcement: Data and theory. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 245–264.
3. Baxter, G.A., & Schlinger, H. (1990). Performance of children under a multiple randomratio random-interval schedule of reinforcement. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 54, 263–271.
4. Cole, M.R. (1994). Response rate differences in variable-interval and variable-ratio schedules: An old problem revisited. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 61, 441–451.
5. Ferster, C.B., & Skinner, B.F. (1957). Schedules of reinforcement. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
6. Howell, D.C. (1997). Statistical methods for psychology. London: Duxbury
7. Jacobs, E.A., & Hackenberg, T.D. (2000). Human performance on negative slope schedules of points exchangeable for money: A failure of molar maximization. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 73, 241–260.
8. Lowe, C.F. (1979). Determinants of human operant behavior. In M.D.Zeiler & P.Harzem (Eds.), Advances in analysis of behaviour (volume 1): Reinforcement and the organisation of behaviour (pp. 159–192) Chichester, UK: Wiley.
9. Mathews, B.A., Shimoff, E., Catania, A.C., & Sagvolden, T. (1977). Unstructured human responding: Sensitivity to ratio and interval contingencies. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 27, 453–467.
10. Navarick, D.J. (1985). Choice in humans: Functional properties of reinforcers established by instruction. Behavioural Processes, 11, 269–277.
11. Peele, D.B., Casey, J., & Silberberg, A. (1984). Primacy of interresponse-time reinforcement in accounting for rates under variable-ratio and variable-interval schedules. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 10, 149–167.
12. Rachlin, H.A., Raineri, A., & Cross, D. (1991). Subjective probability and delay. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 55, 233–244.
13. Raia, C.P., Shillingford, S.W., Miller, H.L., & Baier, P.S. (2000). Interaction of procedural factors in human performance on yoked schedules, Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 74, 265–281.
14. Reed, P. (1994). Influence of the cost of responding on human causality judgments. Memory and Cognition, 22, 243–248.
15. Reed, P. (1999). Effect of perceived cost on judgments regarding the efficacy of investment. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20, 657–676.
16. Wanchisen, B.A., Tatham, T.A., & Mooney, S.E. (1989). Variable-ratio conditioning history produces highand low-rate fixed interval performance in rats. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 52, 167–179.
17. Wearden, J.H. (1988). Some neglected problems in the analysis of human operant behavior. In, G.Davey & C.Cullen (Eds.), Human operant conditioning and behavior modification (pp. 197–224). New York: John Wiley.
18. Wearden, J.H., & Shimp, C.P. (1985). Local temporal patterning of operant behavior in humans. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 44, 315–324.
19. Zeiler, M.D. (1977). Schedules of reinforcement. In W.K.Honig & J.E.R.Staddon (Eds.), A handbook of operant behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.