An integrated model of concept learning and word-concept mapping

Cooperative Minds: Social Interaction and Group Dynamics - Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 882-887

  Lewis, Molly ^a   Frank, Michael C ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bayesian models; cross situational word learning

Indexed keywords

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

AMBIGUOUS CONTEXTS; BAYESIAN MODELLING; CONCEPT LEARNING; CONCEPTS MAPPINGS; CROSS-SITUATIONAL WORD LEARNING; HIERARCHICAL BAYESIAN MODELING; INTEGRATED MODELING; LEARN+; WORD LEARNING; WORD MEANING;

BAYESIAN NETWORKS;

EID: 85073314355     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (22)

1. Akhtar, N., & Montague, L. (1999). Early lexical acquisition: The role of cross-situational learning. First Language, 19(57), 347-358.
2. Bornstein, M., Kessen, W., & Weiskopf, S. (1976). Color vision and hue categorization in young human infants. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 2(1), 115.
3. Clark, E. (1987). The principle of contrast: A constraint on language acquisition. Mechanisms of language acquisition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
4. Diesendruck, G., & Markson, L. (2001). Children's avoidance of lexical overlap: A pragmatic account. Developmental Psychology, 37(5), 630.
5. Frank, M. C., Goodman, N., & Tenenbaum, J. (2009). Using speakers' referential intentions to model early cross-situational word learning. Psychological Science, 20(5), 578.
6. Goodman, N., Tenenbaum, J., Feldman, J., & Griffiths, T. (2010). A rational analysis of rule-based concept learning. Cognitive Science, 32(1), 108-154.
7. Laurence, S., & Margolis, E. (1999). Concepts: Core readings. In E. Margolis & S. Laurence (Eds.), (chap. 1). MIT Press.
8. Lewis, M., & Frank, M. C. (2013). Modeling disambiguation in word learning via multiple probabilistic constraints. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society.
9. Markman, E. (1990). Constraints children place on word meanings. Cognitive Science, 14(1), 57-77.
10. Markman, E., & Wachtel, G. (1988). Children's use of mutual exclusivity to constrain the meanings of words. Cognitive Psychology, 20(2), 121-157.
11. Markman, E., Wasow, J., & Hansen, M. (2003). Use of the mutual exclusivity assumption by young word learners. Cognitive Psychology, 47(3), 241-275.
12. Medin, D., & Ortony, A. (1989). Psychological essentialism. Similarity and Analogical Reasoning, 179-195.
13. Pinker, S. (1984). Language learnability and language development, with new commentary by the author (Vol. 7). Harvard University Press.
14. Quine, W. (1960). Word and object (Vol. 4). The MIT Press.
15. Rosch, E., & Mervis, C. (1975). Family resemblances: Studies in the internal structure of categories. Cognitive Psychology, 7(4), 573-605.
16. Rosch, E., Mervis, C., Gray, W., Johnson, D., & Boyes-Braem, P. (1976). Basic objects in natural categories. Cognitive Psychology, 8(3), 382-439.
17. Shepard, R., Hovland, C., & Jenkins, H. (1961). Learning and memorization of classifications. Psychological Monographs: General and Applied, 75(13), 1-42.
18. Sloutsky, Lo, Y.-F., & Fisher, A. V. (2001). How much does a shared name make things similar? Linguistic labels, similarity, and the development of inductive inference. Child Development, 72(6), 1695-1709.
19. Smith, L. B., Jones, S. S., Landau, B., Gershkoff-Stowe, L., & Samuelson, L. (2002). Object name learning provides on-the-job training for attention. Psychological Science, 13(1), 13-19.
20. Smith, L. B., & Yu, C. (2008). Infants rapidly learn word-referent mappings via cross-situational statistics. Cognition, 106(3), 1558-1568.
21. Xu, F., & Tenenbaum, J. (2007). Word learning as Bayesian inference. Psychological Review, 114(2), 245.
22. Yu, C., & Smith, L. (2007). Rapid word learning under uncertainty via cross-situational statistics. Psychological Science, 18(5), 414-420.