Systematic assessment of complications after robotic-assisted total versus distal gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: A retrospective propensity score-matched study using Clavien–Dindo classification

International Journal of Surgery

Volumn 71, Issue , 2019, Pages 140-148

  Wang, Wen Jie ^a,c   Li, Rui ^a   Guo, Chang An ^a,c   Li, Hong Tao ^b   Yu, Jian Ping ^b   Wang, Jing ^b,d   Xu, Zi Peng ^a,b   Chen, Wei Kai ^b,d   Ren, Zhi Jian ^a   Tao, Peng Xian ^a   Zhang, Ya Nan ^a   Wang, Chen ^a   Liu, Hong Bin ^a,b  

^a LANZHOU UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b Gansu Key Laboratory of Stem Cells and Genetic Drugs   (China)

^c Gansu Key Laboratory of Stem Cell and Gene Therapy   (China)

^d GANSU UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE MEDICINE   (China)

Author keywords

Clavien Dindo classification; Gastric cancer; Postoperative complications; Robot assisted distal gastrectomy; Robot assisted total gastrectomy

Indexed keywords

CREATININE;

ABDOMINAL BLEEDING; ABDOMINAL INFECTION; ADULT; ADVANCED CANCER; AGE; ANASTOMOSIS LEAKAGE; ANASTOMOSIS STENOSIS; ARTICLE; ATELECTASIS; BILE LEAKAGE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURGERY; CEREBROVASCULAR ACCIDENT; CLAVIEN DINDO CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL FEATURE; CREATININE BLOOD LEVEL; DUODENUM FISTULA; FEMALE; FEVER; GASTRECTOMY; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LENGTH OF STAY; LIVER DYSFUNCTION; LYMPHATIC SYSTEM DISEASE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL DISEASE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATION DURATION; OPERATIVE BLOOD LOSS; PANCREATITIS; PATIENT SAFETY; PLEURA EFFUSION; PNEUMONIA; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE ILEUS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROPENSITY SCORE; REMNANT GASTRIC INFARCTION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; ROBOTIC ASSISTED DISTAL GASTRECTOMY; SMALL INTESTINE PERFORATION; STOMACH CANCER; SUBCUTANEOUS EMPHYSEMA; TOTAL STOMACH RESECTION; TRANSIENT ISCHEMIC ATTACK; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URINARY TRACT INFECTION; WOUND COMPLICATION; ADVERSE EVENT; AGED; PATHOLOGY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROCEDURES; RISK FACTOR; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; STOMACH TUMOR;

ADULT; AGED; ANASTOMOTIC LEAK; FEMALE; GASTRECTOMY; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PROPENSITY SCORE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; STOMACH NEOPLASMS;

EID: 85072787128     PISSN: 17439191     EISSN: 17439159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2019.09.029     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. R.L. Siegel, K.D. Miller, A. Jemal, Cancer statistics, 2019, CA Cancer J Clin. 69 (2019) 7-34 https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21551
2. F. Bray, J. Ferlay, I. Soerjomataram, R.L. Siegel, L.A. Torre, A. Jemal, Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries, CA Cancer J Clin. 68 (2018) 394-424 https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492
3. W. Chen, R. Zheng, P.D. Baade, S. Zhang, H. Zeng, F. Bray, et al., Cancer statistics in China, 2015, CA Cancer J Clin. 66 (2016) 115-132 https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21338
4. W. Wang, X.W. Sun, C.F. Li, L. Lv, Y.F. Li, Y.B. Chen, et al., Comparison of the 6th and 7th editions of the UICC TNM staging system for gastric cancer: results of a Chinese single-institution study of 1,503 patients, Ann Surg Oncol. 18 (2011) 1060-1067 https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-010-1424-2
5. I. Songun, H. Putter, E.M. Kranenbarg, M. Sasako, C.J. van de Velde, Surgical treatment of gastric cancer: 15-year follow-up results of the randomised nationwide Dutch D1D2 trial, Lancet Oncol. 11 (2010) 439-449 https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(10)70070-X
6. A. Japanese Gastric Cancer, Japanese gastric cancer treatment guidelines 2014 (ver. 4), Gastric Cancer. 20 (2017) 1-19 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-016-0622-4
7. S. Mocellin, P. McCulloch, H. Kazi, J.J. Gama-Rodrigues, Y. Yuan, D. Nitti, Extent of lymph node dissection for adenocarcinoma of the stomach, Cochrane Database Syst Rev. (2015) CD001964 https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD001964.pub4
8. M. Hashizume, K. Sugimachi, Robot-assisted gastric surgery, Surg Clin North Am. 83 (2003) 1429-1444 https://doi.org/10.1016/S0039-6109(03)00158-0
9. K. Obama, Y.M. Kim, D.R. Kang, T. Son, H.I. Kim, S.H. Noh, et al., Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic gastrectomy for gastric cancer compared with laparoscopic gastrectomy, Gastric Cancer. 21 (2018) 285-295 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-017-0740-7
10. W.J. Seo, T. Son, C.K. Roh, M. Cho, H.I. Kim, W.J. Hyung, Reduced-port totally robotic distal subtotal gastrectomy with lymph node dissection for gastric cancer: a modified technique using Single-Site((R)) and two additional ports, Surg Endosc. 32 (2018) 3713-3719 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6208-y
11. H.B. Liu, W.J. Wang, H.T. Li, X.P. Han, L. Su, D.W. Wei, et al., Robotic versus conventional laparoscopic gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A retrospective cohort study, Int J Surg. 55 (2018) 15-23 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.05.015
12. S. Lee, J.K. Kim, Y.N. Kim, D.S. Jang, Y.M. Kim, T. Son, et al., Safety and feasibility of reduced-port robotic distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: a phase I/II clinical trial, Surg Endosc. 31 (2017) 4002-4009 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5435-y
13. B.T. Bucher, J.P. Ferraro, S.R.G. Finlayson, W.W. Chapman, A.V. Gundlapalli, Use of Computerized Provider Order Entry Events for Postoperative Complication Surveillance, JAMA Surg. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1001/jamasurg.2018.4874
14. N. Lou, C.H. Chi, X.D. Chen, C.J. Zhou, S.L. Wang, C.L. Zhuang, et al., Sarcopenia in overweight and obese patients is a predictive factor for postoperative complication in gastric cancer: A prospective study, Eur J Surg Oncol. 43 (2017) 188-195 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.09.006
15. F. Rosa, G. Quero, C. Fiorillo, M. Bissolati, C. Cipollari, S. Rausei, et al., Total vs proximal gastrectomy for adenocarcinoma of the upper third of the stomach: a propensity-score-matched analysis of a multicenter western experience (On behalf of the Italian Research Group for Gastric Cancer-GIRCG), Gastric Cancer. 21 (2018) 845-852 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-0804-3
16. P.A. Clavien, J.R. Sanabria, S.M. Strasberg, Proposed classification of complications of surgery with examples of utility in cholecystectomy, Surgery. 111 (1992) 518-526
17. D. Dindo, N. Demartines, P.A. Clavien, Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey, Ann Surg. 240 (2004) 205-213
18. P.A. Clavien, J. Barkun, M.L. de Oliveira, J.N. Vauthey, D. Dindo, R.D. Schulick, et al., The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience, Ann Surg. 250 (2009) 187-196 https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2
19. W.J. Wang, H.T. Li, P. Chen, J.P. Yu, Z.Y. Jiao, X.P. Han, et al., A propensity score-matched comparison of laparoscopic distal versus total gastrectomy for middle-third advanced gastric cancer, Int J Surg. 60 (2018) 194-203 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.11.015
20. L.C. Duraes, L. Stocchi, S.R. Steele, M.F. Kalady, J.M. Church, E. Gorgun, et al., The Relationship Between Clavien-Dindo Morbidity Classification and Oncologic Outcomes After Colorectal Cancer Resection, Ann Surg Oncol. 25 (2018) 188-196 https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6142-6
21. G. Rac, A. Greiman, A. Rabley, T.J. Tipton, L.R. Chiles, D.A. Freilich, et al., Analysis of Complications of Pelvic Mesh Excision Surgery Using the Clavien-Dindo Classification System, J Urol. 198 (2017) 638-643 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.juro.2017.04.078
22. R.A. Agha, M.R. Borrelli, M. Vella-Baldacchino, R. Thavayogan, D.P. Orgill, S. Group, The STROCSS statement: Strengthening the Reporting of Cohort Studies in Surgery, Int J Surg. 46 (2017) 198-202 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2017.08.586
23. S.F. Huang, T.H. Chien, W.L. Fang, F. Wang, C.Y. Tsai, J.T. Hsu, et al., The 8th edition American Joint Committee on gastric cancer pathological staging classification performs well in a population with high proportion of locally advanced disease, Eur J Surg Oncol. 44 (2018) 1634-1639 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2018.05.036
24. H. In, I. Solsky, B. Palis, M. Langdon-Embry, J. Ajani, T. Sano, Validation of the 8th Edition of the AJCC TNM Staging System for Gastric Cancer using the National Cancer Database, Ann Surg Oncol. 24 (2017) 3683-3691 https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-017-6078-x
25. W.J. Wang, H.T. Li, J.P. Yu, L. Su, C.A. Guo, P. Chen, et al., Severity and incidence of complications assessed by the Clavien-Dindo classification following robotic and laparoscopic gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: a retrospective and propensity score-matched study, Surg Endosc. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-06624-7
26. U. Benedetto, S.J. Head, G.D. Angelini, E.H. Blackstone, Statistical primer: propensity score matching and its alternatives, Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 53 (2018) 1112-1117 https://doi.org/10.1093/ejcts/ezy167
27. P.C. Austin, N. Jembere, M. Chiu, Propensity score matching and complex surveys, Stat Methods Med Res. 27 (2018) 1240-1257 https://doi.org/10.1177/0962280216658920
28. P.C. Austin, Assessing the performance of the generalized propensity score for estimating the effect of quantitative or continuous exposures on binary outcomes, Stat Med. 37 (2018) 1874-1894 https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7615
29. K. Hosoda, H. Mieno, A. Ema, H. Ushiku, M. Washio, I. Song, et al., Safety and Feasibility of Robotic Distal Gastrectomy for Stage IA Gastric Cancer: A Phase II Trial, J Surg Res. 238 (2019) 224-231 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2019.01.049
30. I. Uyama, K. Suda, M. Nakauchi, T. Kinoshita, H. Noshiro, S. Takiguchi, et al., Clinical advantages of robotic gastrectomy for clinical stage I/II gastric cancer: a multi-institutional prospective single-arm study, Gastric Cancer. 22 (2019) 377-385 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-00906-8
31. C. Mariette, S.R. Markar, T.S. Dabakuyo-Yonli, B. Meunier, D. Pezet, D. Collet, et al., Hybrid Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy for Esophageal Cancer, N Engl J Med. 380 (2019) 152-162 https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1805101
32. G.L. Baiocchi, S. Giacopuzzi, D. Marrelli, D. Reim, G. Piessen, P. Matos da Costa, et al., International consensus on a complications list after gastrectomy for cancer, Gastric Cancer. 22 (2019) 172-189 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-0839-5
33. J. van Hilst, T. de Rooij, S. Klompmaker, M. Rawashdeh, F. Aleotti, B. Al-Sarireh, et al., Minimally Invasive versus Open Distal Pancreatectomy for Ductal Adenocarcinoma (DIPLOMA): A Pan-European Propensity Score Matched Study, Ann Surg. 269 (2019) 10-17 https://doi.org/10.1097/SLA.0000000000002561
34. W.J. Hyung, H.K. Yang, S.U. Han, Y.J. Lee, J.M. Park, J.J. Kim, et al., A feasibility study of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for clinical stage I gastric cancer: a prospective multi-center phase II clinical trial, KLASS 03, Gastric Cancer. 22 (2019) 214-222 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-018-0864-4
35. D. Stefanidis, S.B. Bailey, T. Kuwada, C. Simms, K. Gersin, Robotic gastric bypass may lead to fewer complications compared with laparoscopy, Surg Endosc. 32 (2018) 610-616 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-017-5710-y
36. B. Lu, D. Cai, X. Tong, Testing causal effects in observational survival data using propensity score matching design, Stat Med. 37 (2018) 1846-1858 https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.7599
37. J. Lu, H.L. Zheng, P. Li, J.W. Xie, J.B. Wang, J.X. Lin, et al., A Propensity Score-Matched Comparison of Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: Oncological, Cost, and Surgical Stress Analysis, J Gastrointest Surg. 22 (2018) 1152-1162 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3785-y
38. Y. Gao, H. Xi, Z. Qiao, J. Li, K. Zhang, T. Xie, et al., Comparison of robotic- and laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy in advanced gastric cancer: updated short- and long-term results, Surg Endosc. 33 (2019) 528-534 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6327-5
39. M.H. Hyun, C.H. Lee, Y.J. Kwon, S.I. Cho, Y.J. Jang, D.H. Kim, et al., Robot versus laparoscopic gastrectomy for cancer by an experienced surgeon: comparisons of surgery, complications, and surgical stress, Ann Surg Oncol. 20 (2013) 1258-1265 https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-012-2679-6
40. K.G. Lee, H.J. Lee, J.Y. Yang, S.Y. Oh, S. Bard, Y.S. Suh, et al., Risk factors associated with complication following gastrectomy for gastric cancer: retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data based on the Clavien-Dindo system, J Gastrointest Surg. 18 (2014) 1269-1277 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-014-2525-1
41. M. Ri, N. Hiki, N. Ishizuka, S. Ida, K. Kumagai, S. Nunobe, et al., Duodenal stump reinforcement might reduce both incidence and severity of duodenal stump leakage after laparoscopic gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction for gastric cancer, Gastric Cancer. (2019) https://doi.org/10.1007/s10120-019-00946-8
42. C. Kunisaki, H. Miyamoto, S. Sato, Y. Tanaka, K. Sato, Y. Izumisawa, et al., Surgical Outcomes of Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Gastrectomy Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer: A Propensity-Matched Retrospective Cohort Study, Ann Surg Oncol. 25 (2018) 3604-3612 https://doi.org/10.1245/s10434-018-6733-x
43. C.J. Huang, R.C. Zhang, Y.P. Mou, Y.C. Zhou, Y.Y. Wang, C. Lu, et al., Short and long-term outcomes of laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: A single-center experience (retrospective cohort study), Int J Surg. 51 (2018) 109-113 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.01.027
44. D.J. Kim, J.H. Lee, W. Kim, Comparison of the major postoperative complications between laparoscopic distal and total gastrectomies for gastric cancer using Clavien-Dindo classification, Surg Endosc. 29 (2015) 3196-3204 https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-014-4053-1
45. R.H. Tu, J.X. Lin, C.H. Zheng, P. Li, J.W. Xie, J.B. Wang, et al., Development of a nomogram for predicting the risk of anastomotic leakage after a gastrectomy for gastric cancer, Eur J Surg Oncol. 43 (2017) 485-492 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2016.11.022
46. J. Zhou, P. Yu, Y. Shi, B. Tang, Y. Hao, Y. Zhao, et al., Evaluation of Clavien-Dindo classification in patients undergoing total gastrectomy for gastric cancer, Med Oncol. 32 (2015) 120 https://doi.org/10.1007/s12032-015-0573-3
47. M. Cho, T. Son, H.I. Kim, S.H. Noh, S. Choi, W.J. Seo, et al., Similar hematologic and nutritional outcomes after proximal gastrectomy with double-tract reconstruction in comparison to total gastrectomy for early upper gastric cancer, Surg Endosc. (2018) https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-018-6448-x
48. J.H. Kim, Y.J. Bae, K.H. Jun, H.M. Chin, The prevalence and clinical significance of postgastrectomy anemia in patients with early-stage gastric cancer: A retrospective cohort study, Int J Surg. 52 (2018) 61-66 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijsu.2018.02.037
49. F. Zhu, D. Feng, T. Zhang, L. Gu, W. Zhu, Z. Guo, et al., Toward a More Sensitive Endpoint for Assessing Postoperative Complications in Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease: a Comparison Between Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI) and Clavien-Dindo Classification (CDC), J Gastrointest Surg. 22 (2018) 1593-1602 https://doi.org/10.1007/s11605-018-3786-x