Governing the child in the new millennium

Governing the Child in the New Millennium

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1-14

  Hultqvist, Kenneth ^a   Dahlberg, Gunilla ^a  

^a STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85071522686     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203614525-5     Document Type: Chapter

References (32)

1. Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
2. Aries, P. (1962). Centuries of childhood: A social history of family life. New York: Vintage Books.
3. Baker, B. (1998). “Childhood�? in the emergence and spread of U.S. public schools. In T. S. Popkewitz & M. Brennan (Eds.), Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education (pp. 117-43). New York: Teachers College Press.
4. Bernstein, R.J. (Ed.) (1992). Habermas and modernity. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
5. Castel, M. (1996). The information age: Economy, society and culture. Volume I: The rise of the network society. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.
6. Dahlberg, G., Moss, P., & Pence, A. (1999). Beyond quality in early childhood education and care. London: Falmer Press.
7. Fergusson, R. L. (1997). The American Enlightenment 1750-1820. London: Harvard University Press.
8. Foucault, M. (1980). The confession of the flesh. In C. Gordon (Ed.), Michel Foucault: Power/Knowledge (pp. 194-228). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
9. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality. In G. Burchel, C. Gordon, & P. Miller, The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87-104). London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
10. Hall, G. S. (1888). The contents ofchildren’s minds on entering schools. New York: Kellogg.
11. Hennon, L. (2000). The construction of discursive space as patterns of inclusion/exclusion; Governmentality and urbanism in the United States. In T. S. Popkewitz (Ed.), Educational knowledge: Changing relationships between the state, civil society and the educational community (pp. 243-61). New York: State University of New York Press.
12. Hindess, B. (1993). Liberalism, socialism and democracy: Variations ofa governmental theme. In A. Barry, T. Osborne, & N. Rose (Eds.), Foucault and political reason, liberalism, neo-liberalism and governmentality, economy and society, pp. 65-80. London: UCL Press.
13. Hultqvist, K. (1997). Changing rationales for governing the child: A historical perspective on the construction of the child in two institutional contexts-the school and the pre-school. Childhood, 4, pp. 405-24.
14. Hultqvist, K. (1998). A history of the present on children’s welfare in Sweden. From Frobel to present-day decentralization projects. In T. S. Popkewitz & M. Brennan (Eds.), Foucault’s challenge: Discourse, knowledge, and power in education (pp. 91-116). New York: Teachers College Press.
15. Jenks, C. (1996). Childhood. London: Routledge.
16. Kant, I. (1784). Beautwortung der Frage: Was ist Aufklarung Berlinische Monatschrift.
17. Montessori, M. (1912). The Montessori method. London: Heineman.
18. Montessori, M. (1936). The secrets ofchildhood. Bombay: Orient Longman.
19. Osborne, T., & Rose, N. (1997). In the name of society, or three theses on the history of social thought. History of the Human Sciences, 10 (3), 87-104.
20. Popkewitz, T. S. (2000). Globalization/regionalization, knowledge, and the educational practices: Some notes on comparative strategies for educational research. In T. S. Popkewitz (Ed.), Educational knowledge: Changing relationships between the state, civil society and the educational community (pp. 3-24). New York: State University of New York Press.
21. Popkewitz, T. S. (2000). National imaginaries, the indigenous foreigner and power: Comparative educational research In J. Schriever (Ed.), Discourse formation in comparative education (pp. 261-94). Berlin: Peter Lang Verlag.
22. Popkewitz, T. S., & Pitman, A (1986). The idea of progress and the legitimation of state agendas: American proposals for school reform. Curriculum and Teaching, 1 (1-2), 11-24.
23. Raulet, G. (1985). Michel Foucault interviewed by G. Raulet. Structuralism and poststructuralism, Res Publica, vol. 3. Lund: Symposium.
24. Rose, N. (1990). Governing the soul: The shaping of the private self. London: Routledge.
25. Rose, N. (1996a). The death of the social: Refiguring the territory of government. Economy and Society, 25, 327-66.
26. Rose, N. (1996b). Inventing ourselves: Psychology, power andpersonhood. New York: Cam-bridge University Press.
27. Rose, N. (1999). Powers of freedom: Rframing political thought. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
28. Rose, N. (2000, February 8). The politics of life itself: Biosociality, genetics and the government ofthe human vital order. Paper presented at an open lecture at the Stockholm Institute of Education.
29. Rousseau, J. J. (1877). La nouvelle Héloise. Paris: Firmin-Didot.
30. Rousseau, J. J. (1977). Emile, ellerom uppfostran, dell ochII. Goteborg: Stegelandsforlag.
31. Wagner, P. (1994). A sociology of modernity: Liberty and discipline. London: Routledge.
32. Walkerdine, V (1995): Utvecklingspsykologi och den barncentrerade pedagogiken: inforandet av Piaget i tidig undervisning In K. Hultqvist & K. Petersson (Eds.), Foucault, namnetpa en modern vetenskaplig ochfilosofiskproblematik (pp. 124-71). Stockholm: HLS forlag.