North and South Korea: Language policies of divergence and convergence

Language Planning and Language Policy: East Asian Perspectives

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 129-158

  Song, Jae Jung ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTAGO   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85070590237     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315028873-13     Document Type: Chapter

References (81)

1. An, P.-H. 1983. Hancca rnwuncey-ey tayhan cengchayk kwa ceysel [Policies and views on use of Hancca]. In: Lee, K.M. et al eds. Hankwuk Emwun-uy Ceymwuncey [Issues in the Korean Language and Writing]. Seoul: I1cisa. 78-115.
2. Baik, M. J. 1992. Language shift and identity in Korea. In: Journal of Asian Pacific Communication 3(1): 15-31.
3. Baik, M. J. 1994. Syntactic features of Englishization in Korean. In: World Englishes 13(2): 155-166.
4. Baik, M. J. and R. J. Shim. 1998. Reply. In: World Englishes 17(2): 273-279.
5. Baik, M. J. and R. J. Shim. 1995. Language, culture, and ideology in the English textbooks of two Koreas. In: Tickoo, M.Led. Language and Culture in Multilingual Societies: Viewpoints and Visions. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre. 122-138.
6. Clarke, H.D.B. 1982. Linguistics and language policies in North and South Korea. In: Korea journal 22(1): 20-23.
7. Clyne, M. ed. 1997a. Undoing and Redoing Corpus Planning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
8. Clyne, M. ed. 1997b. Introduction: on the undoing and redoing of corpus planning. In: Clyne, Med. Undoing and Redoing Corpus Planning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 1-9.
9. Clyne, M. ed. 1997c. The reconvergence of German after unification and its limits. In: Clyne, Med. Undoing and Redoing Corpus Planning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 117-142.
10. Clyne, M. ed. 1997d. Epilogue. In: Clyne, Med. Undoing and Redoing Corpus Planning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 477-502.
11. Cooper, R.L. 1989. Language Planning and Social Change. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Coulmas, F. 1989. The Writing Systems of the World. Oxford: Blackwell.
13. Fasold, R. 1984. The Sociolinguistics of Society. Oxford: Blackwell.
14. Ferguson, CA. 1959. Diglossia. In: Word 15: 325-340.
15. Fishman, J. A. 1967. Bilingualism with and without diglossia: diglossia with and without bilingualism. In: Journal of Social Issues 32: 29-38.
16. Fishman, J. A. 1973. Language modernization and planning in comparison with other types of national modernization and planning. In: Language in Society 2: 23-43.
17. Fishman, J. A. 1983a. Modeling rationales in corpus planning: modernity and tradition in images of the good corpus. In: Cobarrubias, J. and Fishman, J.A. eds. Progress in Language Planning: International Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 107-118.
18. Fishman, J. A. 1983b. Progress in language planning: a few concluding sentiments. In: Cobarrubias, J. and Fishman, J.A. eds. Progress in Language Planning: International Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 381-383.
19. Garvin, P.L. 1972. Some comments on language planning. In: Rubin, J. and Shuy, R eds. Language Planning: Current Issues and Research. Washington: Georgetown University Press. 24-33.
20. Gottlieb, N. 1994. Language and imperialism: Japan’s wartime language policies in Asia and the Pacific. In: New Zealand journal of East Asian Studies 2: 3-21.
21. Hankwuk emwun kyoyuk yenkwuhoi [The Research Institute of Education in Korean Language and Writing]. 1985. Hankul kwa Hancca [Hankul and Hancca]. Seoul: I1cokak.
22. Hannas, W. C. 1997. Asia’s Orthographic Dilemma. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
23. Haugen, E. 1966. Linguistics and language planning. In: Bright, Wed. Sociolinguistics. The Hague: Mouton. 50-71.
24. Haugen, E. 1983. The implementation of corpus planning: theory and practice. In: Cobarrubias, J. and Fishman, J.A eds. Progress in Language Planning: International Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 269-288.
25. Hirataka, E 1992. Language-spread policy of Japan. In: International Journal of the Sociology of Language 95: 93-108.
26. Hong, Y. 1991. A Sociolinguistic Study of Seoul Korean: With a Special Section on Language Divergence between North and South Korea. Seoul: Research Center for Peace and Unification of Korea.
27. Jernudd, B.H. 1972. Language planning as a type of language treatment. In: Rubin, J. and Shuy, R eds. Language Planning: Current Issues and Research. Washington: Georgetown University Press. 11-23.
28. Jernudd, B.H. 1977. Prerequisites for a model of language treatment. In: Rubin, J., Jernudd, B.H., Das Gupta, J., Fishman, J.A. and Ferguson C.A eds. Language Planning Processes. The Hague: Mouton. 41-54.
29. Jernudd, B.H. and Das Gupta, J. 1971. Towards a theory of language planning. In: Rubin, J. and Jernudd, B.H eds. Can Language Be Planned? Sociolinguistic Theory and Practice for Developing Nations. Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii. 195-215.
30. Karam, EX. 1974. Toward a definition of language planning. In: Fishman, J.Aed. Advances in Language Planning. The Hague: Mouton. 103-124.
31. Kim, C.-W. 1978a. Linguistics and language policies in North Korea. In: Korean Studies 2: 159-175.
32. Kim, C.-W. 1978b. Divergence in language policies in Korea. In: Kim, C.-Wed. Papers in Korean Linguistics. Columbia: Hornbeam Press. 245-257.
33. Kim, C.-W. 1991. Korean as a pluricentric language. In: Clyne, Med. Pluricentric Languages: Differing Norms in Different Nations. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 239-260.
34. Kim, I.-S. 1946/1963. Socialization of language [in Korean]. In: Kim II-Sung Cecak Sencip [The Complete Writings of Kim II-Sung), Vol. 1: 97-98.
35. Kim, I.-S. 1964/1968. Problems in the development of Korean: a dialogue with linguists [in Korean). In: Mwunhwa-e Haksup [Instruction in the Cultured Language) 2: 1-7. Also in: Kim II-Sung Cecak Sencip [The Complete Writings of Kim II-Sung], Vol. 4: 1-7.
36. Kim, I.-S. 1966/1969. On fostering national characteristics of Korean [in Korean). In: Mwunhwa-e Haksup [Instruction in the Cultured Language) 3: 1-9.
37. Kim, M.-S. 1972. Language policies of North Korea. In: Aseya Yenkwu [Asia Research) 15(4): 1-53.
38. Kim, M.-S. 1973a. Kwuke Cengcheykron [On Korean Language Policy). Seoul: Korea University Press.
39. Kim, M.-S. 1973b. Language policies of North Korea. In: Pwukhan [North Korea] 2(7): 263-271.
40. Kim, M.-S. 1989. Pwukhan-uy Kwuke Yenkwu [North Korean Studies in Korean]. Seoul: Ilcokak.
41. Kim, N.-K. 1987. Korean. In: Comrie, Bed. The World’s Major Languages. London: Croom Helm. 881-898.
42. Kim, N.-K. 1992. Korean. In: Bright, Wed. International Encyclopedia of Linguistics, Vol. 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 282-286.
43. Kim-Renaud, Y.-K. ed. 1997. The Korean Alphabet. Honolulu: University of Hawaii Press.
44. Kloss, H. 1968. Notes concerning a language-nation typology. In: Fishman, J.A., Ferguson, C.A., and Das Gupta, J. eds. Language Problems of Developing Nations. New York: John Wiley. 69-86.
45. Ko, Y.-K. ed. 1989. Pwukhan-uy Mal Kwa Kul [Language and Writing in North Korea]. Seoul: Ulyu Mwunhwasa.
46. Kumatani, A. 1990. Language policies in North Korea. In: International Journal of the Sociology of Language 82: 87-108.
47. Kwon, Y.-K. and Kim, M.-S. 1990. Say-Hankul Macchwumpep Sacen [A Dictionary of the Revised Orthography]. Seoul: Ciphyencen.
48. Lee, C.-M. 1985. Hakswul-enlon-ey nathana-nun kwuke kwumwunsangey mwuncey [On syntactic problems in academic writing]. In: Ehakyenkwu [Research in Language] 21(1): 33-84.
49. Lee, C.-M. 1990. Hakswul-enlon-ey nathana-nun kwuke kwumwunsang-ey mwuncey-cern [On syntactic problems in academic writing]. In: Lee, K.M. et al eds. Hankwuke-uy Palcen-panghyang [New Developments and Directions in Korean]. Seoul: Minumsa. 97-170.
50. Lee, E.-J. 1988. Kayceng-han Hankul Macchwumpep Mich Phyocwune Haysel [A Treatise on the Revised Orthography and the Standard Dialect]. Seoul: Tayceykak.
51. Lee, H.-B. 1988. Revised Korean spelling system. In: Korea Journal 28(4): 34-41.
52. Lee, H.-B. 1990. Differences in language use between North and South Korea. In: International Journal of the Sociology of Language 82: 71-86.
53. Lee, K.-B. 1984. A New History of Korea [Translated by E. W. Wagner with E.]. Shultz].Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.
54. Lee, K.-M. 1990. Hakswul-ene-lose-uy Hankwuk-e [Korean as an academic language]. In: Lee, K.M. et al eds. Hankwuke-uy Palcenpanghyang [New Developments and Directions in Korean]. Seoul: Minumsa. 11-22.
55. Lee, S. 1989. The subversion of Korean. In: English Today 20: 34-37.
56. Lee, Y. 1975. Nihon tojika Chosen ni okeru Nihongo kyoiku: Chosen Kyoikurei to no kanren ni oite [Japanese language education in Korea under Japanese rule: in connection with the Korea Education Ordinance]. In: Chosen Gakuho 75: 97-114.
57. Lyeom, G. 1969. The Korean language: its origin, history, and new romanization. In: Korean Research Bulletin 3: 5-25.
58. Nahir, M. 1984. Language planning goals: a classification. In: Language Problems and Language Planning 8: 294-327.
59. Neustupny, J.V. 1965. First steps towards the conception of ‘Oriental languages’. In: Archiv Orientalni 33: 83-92.
60. Neustupny, J.V. 1970. Basic types of treatment of language problems. In: Linguistic communications 1: 77-98.
61. Neustupny, J.V. 1974. The modernization of the Japanese system of communication. In: Language in Society 3: 33-50.
62. Neustupny, J.V. 1976. Language correction in contemporary Japan. In: Language Planning Newsletter 2 (3): 1,3-5.
63. Nguyen, X. T. 1997. The reconvergence of Vietnamese. In: Clyne, Med. Undoing and Redoing Corpus Planning. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter. 143-163.
64. Park, S. and Arbuckle, T.Y. 1977. Ideograms versus alphabets: effects of scripts on memory in “biscriptal�? Korean subjects. In: Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory 3: 631-642.
65. Park, Y. 1991. Language policy and language education in North Korea. In: Korea Journal 31(1): 28-40.
66. Platt, J.T. 1976. Some aspects of language planning in Malaysia. In: Kivung 9: 3-17.
67. Rubin, J. 1971. Evaluation and language planning. In: Rubin, J. and Jernudd, B.H. eds. Can Language Be Planned? Honolulu: University Press of Hawaii. 218-252.
68. Rubin, J. 1972. Language planning: discussion of some current issues. In: Rubin, J. and Shuy, R eds. Language Planning: Current Issues and Research. Washington: Georgetown University Press. 1-10.
69. Rubin, J. 1983. Evaluating status planning: what has the past decade accomplished? In: Cobarrubias, J. and Fishman, J.A. eds. Progress in Language Planning: International Perspectives. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 329-343.
70. Sampson, G. 1985. Writing Systems: A Linguistic Introduction. London: Hutchinson.
71. Sasse, W. 1980. The ‘Cultured Language’: implication of a policy in North Korea. In: Papers in Korean Linguistics 2: 67-76.
72. Shim, R. J. 1994. Englishized Korean: structure, status, and attitudes. In: World Englishes 13(2): 225-244.
73. Sim, J.-K. 1990. Hancca-e-uy kwake hyencey milay [Past, present and future of Hancca]. In: Lee, K.M. et al eds. Hankwuke-uy Palcenpanghyang [New Developments and Directions in Korean]. Seoul: Minumsa. 73-93.
74. Sin, H.-S. 1988. Lotong-sinmwun-ul thonghay-pon Pwukhan-uy Enehyensang. In: Hankul 200: 253-301.
75. So, H.-R. 1990. Wuli-mal-uy nonlicek phyohyen. In: Lee, K.M. et al eds. Hankwuke-uy Palcen-panghyang [New Developments and Directions in Korean]. Seoul: Minumsa. 177-210.
76. Song, I.-Y. 1972. The Neo-North Korean speech glimpsed. In: Korea Journal 12(12): 15-16.
77. Song, J. J. 1994. Language policies in North and South Korea. In: New Zealand Journal of East Asian Studies 2: 49-60.
78. Song, J. J. 1998. English in South Korea revisited via M.J. Baik (1992, 1994), and R. J. Shim (1994). In: World Englishes 17(2): 263-271.
79. Taylor, I. and Taylor, M.M. 1995. Writing and Literacy in Chinese, Korean and Japanese. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
80. Tranter, Nicolas. 1997. Hybrid Anglo-Japanese loans in Korean. In: Linguistics 35: 133-166.
81. Tsurumi, E. P. 1984. Colonial education in Korea and Taiwan. In: Myers, R.H. and Peattie, M.R eds. The Japanese Colonial Empire, 1895-1945. Princeton, N.].: Princeton University Press. 275-311.