Managing performance in the public sector

Managing Performance in the Public Sector

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 1-129

  de Bruijn, Hans ^a  

^a DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85070408216     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203222874     Document Type: Book

References (113)

1. P. van der Knaap, ‘Resultaatgerichte verantwoordelijkheid’, in Bestuurskunde, Elsevier, The Hague, 2000, no. 5, pp. 237-47.
2. David Osborne and Ted Gaebler, Reinventing Government, Penguin, Reading, Massachusetts, 1992;
3. David Osborne and Peter Plastrik, The Reinventor’s Fieldbook. Tools for Transforming Your Government, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, 2000;
4. Geert Bouckaert and Tom Auwers, Prestaties meten in de overheid, Die Keure, Bruges, 1999;
5. PUMA (Public Management) activities of the OECD (http://www.oecd.org/puma/)
6. Geert Boeckaert, Dieter Hoes and Wim Ulens, Prestatiemeetsystemen in de overheid: een internationale vergelijking, Die Keure, Bruges, 2000;
7. H. den Boer and L.C. van Zutphen, Business Control and Auditing, Schoonhoven;
8. J.G.W. Broen, A.C. de Jong and A.A. Kooijmans, Besturing en beheersing, Kluwer, Deventer, 2002;
9. H. Thomas Johnson, Relevance Lost. The Rise and Fall of Managament Accounting, Harvard Business School Press, Boston, 1991.
10. David Boddy and Robert Paton, Management. An Introduction, Prentice Hall, London, 1998, p. 65.
11. Robert D. Behn and Peter A. Kant, ‘Strategies for avoiding the pitfalls of performance contracting’, Public Productivity and Management Review (1999), vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 470-89, p. 477.
12. G. Frerks, ‘Performance measurement in foriegn policy: security policy, proper governance, conflict prevention and human rights’, in Towards result-oriented accountability, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, The Hague, 2000, pp. 17-24 (in Dutch).
13. C.N Parkinson, Parkinsons’s Law, Penguin, New York, 1964.
14. David Osborne and Ted Gaebler, Reinventing Government, Penguin, Reading, Massachusetts, 1992 pp. 147-50.
15. Jane S. Durch et al., Improving Health in the Community, National Academy Press, Washington D.C., 1997.
16. Ted Gaebler et al., Positive Outcomes. Raising the Bar on Government Reinvention, Chatelaine Press, Burke, Virginia, 1999, p. 201.
17. David Osborne and Ted Gaebler, Reinventing Government, Penguin, Reading, Massachusetts, 1992, p. 146.
18. David Osborne and Ted Gaebler, Reinventing Government, Penguin, Reading, Massachusetts, 1992, pp. 138-9.
19. Delft University of Technology, An Evaluation of the Use of the University Allocation Model 1996-1999, Delft University of Technology (DUT), Delft, 2000 (in Dutch).
20. David Osborne and Peter Plastrik, Banishing Bureaucracy, Perseus Press, Reading, 1997, p. 145.
21. R.J. in ‘t Veld, Relations Between the State and Higher Education, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 1996, pp. 79-80.
22. M. Weggeman, Leidinggeven aan professionals, Samsom, Deventer, 1994, p. 29.
23. Hans Broere, Symbol City, Netherlands School of Public Administration (NSOB), The Hague, 2001, p. 28.
24. G. Frerks, ‘Performance measurement in foreign policy: security policy, proper governance, conflict prevention and human rights’, in Towards Result-oriented Accountability, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, The Hague 2000, pp. 21 (in Dutch);
25. A.G. Dijkstra, ‘Performance measurement in foreign aid’, in Beleidsanalyse (2000), pp. 13-19 (in Dutch).
26. P. van der Knaap and R. van den Broek, ‘A result-oriented governance model for the judiciary’, in Bestuurskunde (2000), pp. 313-25 (in Dutch).
27. Ted Gaebler et al., Positive Outcomes. Raising The Bar On Government Reinvention, Chatelaine Press, Burke, Virginia 1999, p. 198.
28. Harvard Business Review on Measuring Corporate Performance, Boston, 1998.
29. David Osborne and Peter Plastrik, The Reinventor’s Fieldbook. Tools for Transforming Your Government, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, 2000, p. 225.
30. Geert Boeckaert and Ton Auwers, Measuring Performance in Government, Die Keure, Bruges, 1999, p. 38.
31. Geert Boeckaert and Ton Auwers, Measuring Performance in Government, Die Keure, Bruges, 1999, p. 80.
32. Geert Boeckaert and Ton Auwers, Measuring Performance in Government, Die Keure, Bruges, 1999, p. 38.
33. R. Klein and N. Carter, ‘Performance measurement: a review of concepts and issues’, in D. Beeton (ed.) Performance Measurement. Getting the Concepts Right, Public Finance Foundation, London, 1988.
34. K.A. Van Peursem, M.J. Pratt and S.R. Lawrence, ‘Health management performance. A review of measures and indicators’, in Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal (1995), no. 5, pp. 34-70, p. 60.
35. David Osborne and Ted Gaebler, Reinventing Government, Penguin, Reading, Massachusetts, 1992, Appendix B;
36. David Osborne and Peter Plastrik, The Reinventor’s Fieldbook. Tools for Transforming Your Government, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, 2000.
37. Allard Hoogland, ‘Het OM in de beklaagdenbank’, Hollands Maandblad (1998) no. 2.
38. James Q. Wilson, Bureaucracy: What Government Agencies Do and Why They Do It, Basic Books, New York, 2000.
39. J.A. Winston, on www.city.grande-prairie.ab.ca/perfm_a.htm#Top
40. Robert D. Behn and Peter A. Kant, ‘Strategies for avoiding the pitfalls of performance contracting’, in Public Productivity and Management Review (1999), vol. 22, no. 4, pp. 470-89, p. 474;
41. Smith, P. (1993), ‘Outcome-related performance indicators and organizational control in the public sector’, British Journal of Management, vol. 4, pp. 135-51, pp. 146-8.
42. Nancy Zollers and A.K. Ramanathan, ‘For-profit charter schools and students disabilities: the sordid side of the business of schooling’, Phi Delta Kappan (December 1998), vol. 81, pp. 297ff;
43. Thomas A. Good and Jennifer S. Braden, The Great School Debate: Choice, Vouchers, and Charters, Laurence Erlbaum Association Inc., New Jersey, 1999.
44. John F. Witte, The Market Approach to Education: An Analysis of America’s First Voucher Program, Princeton University Press, Princeton 2000.
45. Jeroen Trommelen, ‘Negentig procent moet dood’, in de Volkskrant, 8 February 2001, p. 13.
46. H.G. Sol, ‘Aggregating data for decision support’, in Decision Support Systems (1985), vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 111-21.
47. John J. Videler, ‘De domme willekeur van het beoordelingssysteem’, in Academische Boekengids (2001), p. 16.
48. Mary Bowerman and Shirley Hawksworth, ‘Local government internal auditors’ perceptions of the Audit Commission’, Managerial Auditing Journal (1999), vol. 14, no. 8, pp. 396-407.
49. Garry D. Carnegie and Peter W. Wolnizer, ‘Enabling accountability in museums’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal (1996), no. 5, pp. 84-99.
50. Coen Teulings, Privatisering in het tijdsgewricht van recollectivisering, OCFEB, Rotterdam 2000;
51. P. Smith (1993), ‘Outcome-related performance indicators and organizational control in the public sector’, British Journal of Management, vol. 4, pp. 135-51, pp. 141-2.
52. M. Goddard, R. Mannion and P. Smith (2000), ‘Enhancing performance in health care: a theoretical perpspective on agency and the role of information’, Economics of Health Care Systems, vol. 9 issue 2, pp. 95-107.
53. Anthony L. Iaquito, ‘Can winners be losers? The case of the Deming prize for quality and performance among large Japanese manufacturing firms’, Managerial Auditing Journal, 1999, vol. 14, no. 1/2, pp. 28-35.
54. Edward B. Fiske and Helen F. Ladd, When Schools Compete. A Cautionary Tale, The Brooking Institution, Washington, 2000.
55. F.L. Leeuw, ‘Performance auditing, new public management and performance improvement: questions and answers’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal (1996) vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 92-102;
56. F.L. Leeuw, ‘Onbedoelde neveneffecten van outputsturing, controle en toezicht?', Raad voor Maatschappelijke Ontwikkeling, Aansprekend burgerschap, RMO, The Hague 2000, pp. 149-71.
57. F.L. Leeuw, ‘Performance auditing, new public management and performance improvement: questions and answers’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal (1996) vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 92-102;
58. F.L. Leeuw, ‘Onbedoelde neveneffecten van outputsturing, controle en toezicht?', Raad voor Maatschappelijke Ontwikkeling, Aansprekend burgerschap, RMO, The Hague 2000, pp. 149-71.
59. P. Bordewijk and H.L Klaasen, Don’t Think You Can Measure Us, VNG uitgevers, The Hague, 2000, pp. 97-8.
60. John A. Scott, Seeing Like A State, How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1998, pp. 313-29.
61. John A. Scott, Seeing Like A State, How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed, Yale University Press, New Haven, 1998, pp. 313-29.
62. Paul Martens, Amerika-Amsterdam v.v., Netherlands School of Public Administration (NSOB), The Hague, 2001.
63. David Osborne and Ted Gaebler, Reinventing Government, Penguin, Reading, Massachusetts, 1992;
64. David Osborne and Peter Plastrik, The Reinventor’s Fieldbook. Tools for Transforming Your Government, Penguin, San Francisco, 2000, p. 355.
65. R.J. in ‘t Veld, Relations between the State and Higher Education, Kluwer Law International, The Hague, 1996, p. 36 and p. 79;
66. R.J. in ‘t Veld, The Dynamics of Educational Performance Indicators, Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OC&W), The Hague, 1987.
67. M. Hoogwout, ‘Comptabiliteitsvoorschriften op de schop’, Overheidsmanagement (2000), no. 4, pp. 94-7
68. P. Bordewijk and H.L. Klaassen, Wij laten ons niet kennen, VNG uitgevers, The Hague, 2000, pp. 45-6 .
69. David Osborne and Peter Plastrik, Banishing Bureaucracy, Penguin, Reading, Massachusetts, 1997, p. 145.
70. Henry Kissinger; J.A. de Bruijn, Processen van verandering, Lemma, Utrecht, 2000.
71. Hans Broere, Symbol City, Netherlands School of Public Administration (NSOB), The Hague, 2001.
72. For example in David Osborne and Peter Plastrik, The Reinventor’s Fieldbook. Tools for Transforming Your Government, Jossey Bass, San Francisco, 2000, pp. 223ff.
73. David Osborne and Peter Plastrik, Banishing Bureaucracy, Penguin, Reading, Massachusetts, 1997.
74. David Osborne and Peter Plastrik, Banishing Bureaucracy, Penguin, Reading, Massachusetts, 1997, p. 145.
75. Michael Quinn Patton, Utilization-Focused Evaluation: The New Century Text, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks 1996.
76. D. Coyle, The Weightless World, Capstone Publishing Ltd, Cambridge 1999, p. 23;
77. R. Wigand, A., Picot and R. Reichwald, Information Organization and Management: Expanding Markets and Corporate Boundaries, Wiley, Chichester, 1997.
78. Philippe D’Iribarne, La logique de l’honneur - Gestion d’enterprises et traditions nationales, Editions du Seuil, Paris, 1989.
79. David Osborne and Ted Gaebler, Reinventing Government, Penguin, Reading, Massachusetts, 1992.
80. R.J. in ‘t Veld, Relations between the State and Higher Education, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 1996.
81. Andrea M. Serban and Joseph C. Burke, ‘Meeting the performance challenge. a nine-state comparative analysis’, Public Productivity and Management Review (1998), no. 2, pp. 157-77.
82. Aimee Franklin, ‘Managing for results in Arizona, a fifth-year report card’, Public Productivity and Management Review (1999), pp. 194-209, p. 205.
83. Aimee Franklin, ‘Managing for results in Arizona, a fifth-year report card’, Public Productivity and Management Review (1999), pp. 194-209, p. 205.
84. John F. Murray, Intensive Care: A Doctor’s Journal, University of California Press, Los Angeles 2000.
85. Bobbi Low, Elinor Ostrom, Carl Simon and James Wilson, ‘Redundancy and diversity in governing and managing common-pool resources’, paper presented to the IASCP conference, Bloomington, Indiana, 2000.
86. Michael Power, ‘The Audit Explosion’, in G. Mulgan (ed.), Life after Politics, Fontana Press, London, 1997, pp. 286-93.
87. Malcolm Smith et al., ‘Structure versus appraisal in the audit process: a test of Kinney’s classification’, Managerial Auditing Journal (2001), vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 40-9
88. Lai Hong Chung et al., ‘The influence of subsidiary context and head office strategic management style on control of MNCs: the experience in Australia’, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal (2000), vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 647-68 .
89. Wim Veen, Flexibel onderwijs voor nieuwe generaties studerenden, Delft University of Technology, (DUT), Delft, 2001.
90. Hans de Bruijn and Claire de Nerée tot Babberich, Opposites Attract, Competing Values in Knowledge Management, Lemma, Utrecht, 2000.
91. Henry Mintzberg; Structures in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, 1983.
92. Rein de Wilde, De voorspellers. Een kritiek op de toekomstindustrie, De Balie, Amsterdam, 2000, p. 128.
93. Haselbekke, A.G.J., H.L. Klaassen, A.P. Ros and R.J. in ‘t Veld, ‘Counting performance. Indicators as a tool for a (more) efficient management of decentralized governements’ (in Dutch), VNG, The Hague, 1990.
94. www.trouw.nl
95. J.A. de Bruijn, E.F. ten Heuvelhof and R.J. in ‘t Veld, Process Management. Why Project Management Fails in Complex Decision Making Processes, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, 2002.
96. David Osborne and Ted Gaebler, Reinventing Government, Penguin, Reading, Massachusetts, 1992, Appendix B.
97. NRC Handelsblad, 25 September 1996.
98. Delft University of Technology, An Evaluation of the Use of the University Allocation Model 1996-1999, Delft, 2000, p. 11 (in Dutch).
99. Lakoff, Robin T., The Language War, University of California Press, Berkeley, 2000.
100. Lakoff, Robin T., The Language War, University of California Press, Berkeley 2000.
101. Geert Boeckaert and Ton Auwers, Prestaties meten in de overheid, Die Keure, Bruges, 1999.
102. Boje Larsen, ‘One measurement is better than 1,000 opinions: is it?', Managerial Auditing Journal (2001), no. 2, pp. 63-8.
103. After P. Bordewijk and H.L Klaasen, Don’t Think You Can Measure Us, VNG uitgevers, The Hague 2000, p. 45.
104. P. Bordewijk and H.L Klaasen, Don’t Think You Can Measure Us, VNG uitgevers, The Hague 2000 p. 93.
105. P. Bordewijk and H.L Klaasen, Don’t Think You Can Measure Us, VNG uitgevers, The Hague 2000.
106. P. Bordewijk and H.L Klaasen, Don’t Think You Can Measure Us, VNG uitgevers, The Hague 2000.
107. Robert Quinn, Beyond Rational Management, Wiley, San Francisco, 1998.
108. William M. Rohe, Richard E. Adams, and Thomas A. Arcury, ‘Community policing and planning’, Journal of the American Planning Assocation (2001), vol. 67, no. 1.
109. J.A. de Bruijn and E.F. ten Heuvelhof, Networks and Decision Making, Lemma Publishers, Utrecht 2000.
110. J.A. de Bruijn and E.F. ten Heuvelhof, Networks and Decision Making, Lemma Publishers, Utrecht 2000.
111. J.A. de Bruijn and E.F. ten Heuvelhof, Networks and Decision Making, Lemma Publishers, Utrecht 2000.
112. R.J. in ‘t Veld, Relations between the State and Higher Education, Kluwer Law International, The Hague 1996.
113. David Osborne and Peter Plastrik, Banishing Bureaucracy, Penguin, Reading, Massachusetts, 1997, p. 145.