Self in research: Hopelessly entangled in the gendered organizational culture

Gender, Identity and the Culture of Organizations

Volumn , Issue , 2003, Pages 185-200

  Katila, Saija ^a,b   Meriläinen, Susan ^b  

^a ACADEMY OF FINLAND   (Finland)

^b HELSINKI SCHOOL OF ECONOMICS   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85070364794     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203166758-17     Document Type: Chapter

References (60)

1. Acker, S. (1994). Gendered Education. Sociological Reflections on Women, Teaching and Feminism. Philadelphia, PA: Open University Press.
2. Acker, J., Barry, K. and Esseveld, J. (1983). Objectivity and truth: problems of doing feminist research. Women’s Studies International Forum, 6: 423-435.
3. Atkinson, P. (1996). Sociological Readings and Re-readings. Aldershot: Avebury.
4. Code, L. (1991). What Can She Know?: Feminist Theory and the Construction of Knowledge. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
5. Coffey, A. (1999). The Ethnographic Self. London: Sage.
6. Coleman, G. and Rippin, A. (2000). Putting feminist theory to work: collaboration as a means towards organizational change. Organization, 7(4): 573-587.
7. Collins, H.M. (1975). Conflict Sociology. New York, NY: Academic Press.
8. Collinson, D.L. (1988). Engineering humour: masculinity, joking and conflict in shop floor relations. Organization Studies, 9(2): 181-199.
9. De Lauretis, T. (1984). Alice Doesn’t: Feminism, Semiotics, Cinema. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
10. Ely, R.J. and Meyerson, D. (2000). Advancing gender equity in organizations: the challenge and importance of maintaining a gender narrative. Organization, 7(4): 589-608.
11. Evans, M. (1995). Ivory towers: life in the mind. In L. Morley and V. Walsh (eds), Feminist Academics - Creative Agents for Change. London: Taylor & Francis.
12. Fineman, S. (ed.) (1993). Emotion in Organizations. London: Sage.
13. Fineman, S. (ed.) (2000). Emotion in Organizations (2nd edn). London: Sage.
14. Flax, J. (1987). Postmodern and gender relations in feminist theory. Signs, 16(2): 621-643.
15. Fogelberg, P., Hearn, J., Husu, L. and Mankkinen, T. (eds), (1999). Hard Work in the Academy. Helsinki: Helsinki University Press.
16. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/Knowledge. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
17. Frost, P., Moore, L., Reis Louis, M., Lundberg C. and Martin, J. (eds) (1991). Reframing Organizational Culture. London: Sage.
18. Gatenby, B. and Humphries, M. (2000). Feminist participatory action research: methodological and ethical issues. Women’s Studies International Forum, 23(1): 89-105.
19. Gherardi, S. (1994). The gender we think, the gender we do in our everyday organizational lives. Human Relations, 47(6): 591-610.
20. Grimes, D.S. (2000). Essentialism and Difference in Community Building. http://www.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/RES.../Vol6_2/Vol6_2articles/grimes.asp
21. Haraway, D. (1991). Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The Reinvention of Nature. New York, NY: Routledge.
22. Harding, S. (1993). What is strong objectivity? In L. Alcoff and E. Potter (eds), Feminist Epistemologies. New York, NY: Routledge.
23. Harré, R. (1983). Personal Being. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
24. Harris, A.P. (1991). Race and essentialism in feminist legal theory. In K. Bartlett and R. Kennedy (eds), Feminist Legal Theory: Readings in Law and Gender (pp. 235-262). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
25. Hearn, J. and Parkin, P.W. (1983). Gender in organizations: a selective review and critique of a neglected area. Organization Studies, 4(3): 219-242.
26. Hearn, J. and Parkin, P.W. (1987). ‘Sex’ at ‘Work’ - The Power and Paradox of Organizational Sexuality. Brighton: Wheatsheaf.
27. Helms Mills, J.C. and Mills, A.J. (2000). Rules, sensemaking, formative contexts, and discourse in the gendering of organizational culture. In N. Ashkanasy, C. Wilderom and M. Peterson (eds), Handbook of Organizational Culture and Climate (pp. 55-70). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
28. Husu, L. (2001). Sexism, Support and Survival. Academic Women and Hidden Discrimination in Finland. Social Psychological Studies 6. Helsinki: University of Helsinki, Department of Social Psychology.
29. Jaggar, A. (1989). Love and knowledge: emotion in feminist epistemology. In A. Jaggar and S. Bordo (eds), Gender/Body/Knowledge. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
30. Katila, S. and Meriläinen, S. (1999). A Serious researcher or just another nice girl?: Doing gender in a male-dominated scientific community. Gender, Work and Organization, 6(3): 163-173.
31. Katila, S. and Meriläinen, S. (2002). Metamorphosis: from ʼnice girls’ to ʼnice bitches’. Resisting patriarchal articulations of professional identity. Gender, Work and Organization, 9(3): 336-354.
32. Keller, E.F. (1983). Gender and science. In S. Harding and M.B. Hintikka (eds), Discovering Reality: Feminist Perspectives on Epistemology, Metaphysics, Methodology, and Philosophy of Science (pp. 187-205). London: D. Reidel Publishing Company.
33. Kleinman, S. (1991). Field-workers’ feelings: what we feel, who we are, how we analyze. In W.B. Shaffir and R.A. Stebbins (eds), Experiencing Fieldwork - An Inside View of Qualitative Research (pp. 184-195). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
34. Knights, D. and Richards, W. (2000). Sex Discrimination in UK Academia. Paper presented at the American Academy of Management Meeting, 4-9 August, Toronto, Canada.
35. Kunda, G. (1993). Engineering Culture. Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
36. Lather, P. (1991). Getting Smart: Feminist Research and Pedagogy with/in the Postmodern. New York, NY: Routledge.
37. Longino, H. (1999). Feminist epistemology. In J. Greco and E. Sosa (eds), The Blackwell Guide to Epistemology (pp. 327-353). Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.
38. Loomba, A. (1998). Colonialism/Post-colonialism. London: Routledge.
39. Lundman, R.J. and McFarlane, P.T. (1976). Conflict methodology: an inquiry and preliminary assessment. The Sociological Quarterly, 17: 503-512.
40. Maguire, P. (1987). Doing Participatory Research: A Feminist Approach. Boston, MA: University of Massachusetts.
41. Maguire, P. (2001). Uneven ground: feminisms and action research. In P. Reason and H. Bradbury (eds), Handbook of Action Research: Participative Inquiry and Practice (pp. 59-69). London: Sage.
42. Mäntylä, H. (2000). Dealing with shame at academic work - a literary introspection. Psychiatria Fennica, 31: 148-169.
43. Martin, J. (1994). The organization of exclusion: institutionalization of sex inequality, gendered faculty jobs and gendered knowledge in organizational theory and research. Organization, 1(2): 401-431.
44. Meyerson, D.E. (2000). If emotions were honoured: a cultural analysis. In S. Fineman (ed.), Emotion in Organizations (pp. 167-183). London: Sage.
45. Meyerson, D. and Kolb, D. (2000). Moving out of the ‘armchair’: developing a framework to bridge the gap between feminist theory and practice. Organization, 7(4): 553-571.
46. Morgan, G. (1986). Images of Organization. London: Sage.
47. Mulinari, D. and Sandell, K. (1999). Exploring the notion of experience in feminist thought. Journal of the Scandinavian Sociological Association, 42(4): 287-297.
48. Nelson, J. (1995). Feminism and economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(2): 131-148.
49. Pollert, A. (1981). Girls, Wives, Factory Lives. London: Macmillan.
50. Räsänen, K. and Mäntylä, H. (2001). Preserving academic diversity: promises and uncertainties of PAR as a survival strategy. Organization, 8(2): 301-320.
51. Richardson, L. (1997). Skirting a pleated text: de-disciplining an academic life. Qualitative Inquiry, 3(3): 295-303.
52. Rolin, K. (1999). Gender and Epistemic Trust. Paper presented in the American Philosopical Association Eastern Division Meeting.
53. Ruth, J.-E. and Vilkko, A. (1996). Emotion in the construction of autobiography. In C. Magat and S. McFadden (eds), Handbook of Emotion, Adult Development and Aging (pp. 167-181). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
54. Stolte-Heiskanen, V. (1991). Handmaidens of the ‘knowledge class’, women in science in Finland. In V. Stolte-Heiskanen and R. Fürst-Dilic (eds), Women in Science - Token Women or Gender Equality (pp. 35-62). Oxford: Berg.
55. Swepson, P. (1999). Doing Action Research in My Own Organization: Ethical Dilemmas, Hopes and Triumphs, Action Research international (http//: www.scu.edu.au/shools/sawd/ari/ari-holian.html)
56. Tannen, D. (1996). Gender and Discourse. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
57. Van Maanen, J. (1991). The smile factory: work at Disneyland. In P. Frost, L. Moore, M. Reis Louis, C. Lundberg and J. Martin (eds), Reframing Organizational Culture (pp. 58-76). London: Sage.
58. Wennerås, C. and Wold, A. (1997). Nepotism and sexism in peer-review. Nature, 387(22): 341-343.
59. Whitley, R. (1984). The development of management studies as a fragmented adhocracy. Social Science Information, 23(4/5): 775-818.
60. Ylijoki. O. (1998). Akateemiset heimokulttuurit ja noviisien sosialisaatio. Tampere, Finland: Vastapaino.