Structuring instruction to promote self-regulated learning by adolescents and adults with learning disabilities

Academic Strategy Instruction: A Special Issue of Exceptionality

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2014, Pages 39-60

  Butler, Deborah L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85070001708     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315046198-2     Document Type: Chapter

References (75)

1. Ball, D. L. (1995). Blurring the boundaries of research and practice. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 354-363.
2. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117-148.
3. Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1998). Professional development and reform-based teaching: Introduction to the theme issue. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 1-3.
4. Borkowski, J. G. (1992). Metacognitive theory: A framework for teaching literacy, writing, and math skills. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 253-257.
5. Borkowski, J. G., & Muthukrishna, N. (1992). Moving metacognition into the classroom: “Working models�? and effective strategy teaching. In M. Pressley, K. R. Harris, & J. T. Guthrie (Eds.), Promoting academic competence and literacy in school (pp. 477-501). Toronto: Academic.
6. Borkowski, J. G., Weyhing, R. S., & Carr, M. (1988). Effects of attributional retraining on strategy-based reading comprehension in learning-disabled students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 46-53.
7. Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: Perspectives from cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education (pp. 453-481). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. Brown, A. L. (1987). Metacognition, executive control, self-regulation, and other more mysterious mechanisms. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 65-116). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
9. Brown, A. L., Campione, J. C., & Day, J. D. (1981). Learning to learn: On training students to learn from texts. Educational Researcher, 10(2), 14-21.
10. Butler, D. L. (1993). Promoting strategic learning by adults with learning disabilities: An alternative approach. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.
11. Butler, D. L. (1994). From learning strategies to strategic learning: Promoting self-regulated learning by post secondary students with learning disabilities. Canadian Journal of Special Education, 4, 69-101.
12. Butler, D. L. (1995). Promoting strategic learning by post secondary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 28, 170-190.
13. Butler, D. L. (1998a). Metacognition and learning disabilities. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (2nd ed., pp. 277-307). Toronto: Academic.
14. Butler, D. L. (1998b). In search of the architect of learning: A commentary on scaffolding as a metaphor for instructional interactions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 374-385.
15. Butler, D. L. (1998c). A strategic content learning approach to promoting self-regulated learning. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. Schunk (Eds.), Developing self-regulated learning: From teaching to self-reflective practice (pp. 160-183). New York: Guilford.
16. Butler, D. L. (1998d). The strategic content learning approach to promoting self-regulated learning: A summary of three studies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 682-697.
17. Butler, D. L. (1999a, April). Identifying and remediating students’ inefficient approaches to tasks. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
18. Butler, D. L. (1999b, April). The importance of explicit writing instruction for postsecondary students with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Council for Exceptional Children, Charlotte, NC.
19. Butler, D. L., & Briard, D. (2000). Promoting independent and strategic learning by adolescents with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Council for Learning Disabilities, Austin, TX.
20. Butler, D. L., Elaschuk, C. L., Jarvis, S., Beckingham, B., & Novak, H. (2001, April). Teachers as facilitators of students 'strategicperformance: Promoting academic success by secondary students with learning difficulties. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
21. Butler, D. L., Elaschuk, C. L., & Poole, S. (2000). Promoting strategic writing by postsecondary students with learning disabilities: A report of three case studies. Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 196-213.
22. Butler, D. L., Elaschuk, C., Poole, S., MacLeod, W. B., & Syer, K. (1997, June). Teaching peer tutors to support strategic learning by post-secondary students with learning disabilities. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Canadian Society for Studies in Education, St. John’s, Newfoundland, Canada.
23. Butler, D. L., Elaschuk, C. L., Poole, S. L., Novak, H. J., Jarvis, S., & Beckingham, B. (2000, April). Investigating an application of strategic content learning: Promoting strategy development in group contexts. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
24. Butler, D. L., Novak, H., Beckingham, B., Jarvis, S., & Elaschuk, C. L. (2001, April). Professional development and meaningful change: Towards sustaining an instructional innovation. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Seattle, WA.
25. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
26. Campione, J. C., Brown, A. L., & Connell, M. L. (1988). Metacognition: On the importance of understanding what you are doing. In R. I. Charles & E. A. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (Vol. 3, pp. 93-114). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
27. Como, L. (1993). The best laid plans: Modern conceptions of volition and educational research. Educational Researcher, 22(2), 14-22.
28. Corno, L. (1994). Student volition and education: Outcomes, influences, and practices. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 229-251). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
29. Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61, 239-264.
30. Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Rackliffe, G. (1986). How teachers’ instructional talk influences students’ understanding of lesson content. Elementally School Journal, 87, 3-16.
31. Ellis, E. S. (1993). Integrative strategy instruction: A potential model for teaching content area subjects to adolescents with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 358-383, 398.
32. Ellis, E. S., & Lenz, B. K. (1987). A component analysis of effective learning strategies for LD students. Learning Disabilities Focus, 2(2), 94-107.
33. Englert, C. S. (1992). Writing instruction from a sociocultural perspective: The holistic, dialogic, and social enterprise of writing. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 153-172.
34. Englert, C. S., Raphael, T. E., Anderson, L. M., Anthony, H. M., & Stevens, D. D. (1991). Making strategies and self-talk visible: Writing instruction in regular and special education classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 337-372.
35. Flavcli, J. H. (1987). Speculations about the nature and development of metacognition. In F. E. Weinert & R. H. Kluwe (Eds.), Metacognition, motivation, and understanding (pp. 21-64). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
36. Gaskins, I. W., Anderson, R. C., Pressley, M., Cunicelli, E. A., & Satlow, E. (1993). Six teachers’ dialogue during cognitive process instruction. Elementary School Journal, 93, 277-304.
37. Gersten, R., & Smith-Johnson, J. (2000). Songs of experience: Commentary on “Dyslexia the invisible’’ and “Promoting strategic writing by postsecondary students with learning disabilities: A report of three case studies J Learning Disability Quarterly, 23, 171-174.
38. Groteluschen, A. K., Borkowski, J. G., & Hale, C. (1990). Strategy instruction is often insufficient: Addressing the interdependency of executive and attributional processes. In T. Scruggs & B. Y. L. Wong (Eds.), Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 81-101). New York: Springer-Verlag.
39. Harris, K. R., & Graham, S. (1996). Making the writing process work: Strategies for composition and selfregulation. Cambridge, MA: Brookline.
40. Harris, K. R., & Pressley, M. (1991). The nature of cognitive strategy instruction: Interactive strategy construction. Exceptional Children, 57, 392-404.
41. Kamann, M. P., & Butler, D. L. (1996, April). Strategic content learning: An analysis of instructional features. Paper presented as part of a coordinated symposium at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York.
42. Mehan, H. (1985). The structure of classroom discourse. In T. A. Van Dijk (Ed.), Handbook of'discourse analysis (pp. 119-131). London: Academic.
43. Merriam, S. B. (1998). Qualitative research and case study applications in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
44. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
45. Montague, M. (1993). Student-centered or strategy-centered instruction: What is our purpose? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 26, 433-437.
46. Palincsar, A. (1999). Response: A community of practice. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22, 272-274.
47. Palincsar, A. S., Anderson, C., & David, Y. M. (1993). Pursuing scientific literacy in the middle grades through collaborative problem solving. Elementary School Journal, 93, 643-659.
48. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117-175.
49. Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1988). Teaching and practicing thinking skills to promote comprehension in the context of group problem solving. Remedial and Special Education, 9, 53-59.
50. Palincsar, A. S., & Klenk, L. (1992). Fostering literacy learning in supportive contexts. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 25, 211-225, 229.
51. Paris, S. G., & Byrnes, J. P. (1989). The constructivist approach to self-regulation and learning in the classroom. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice. New York: Springer-Verlag.
52. Perry, N. E., Walton, C., & Calder, K. (1999). Teachers developing assessments of early literacy: A community of practice project. Teacher Education and Special Education, 22, 218-233.
53. Pintrich, P. R., Anderman, E. M., & Klobucar, C. (1994). Intraindividual differences in motivation and cognition in students with and without learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 27, 360-370.
54. Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Brown, R., Schuder, T., Bergman, J. L., York, M., et al. (1995). A transactional strategies instruction Christmas carol. In A. McKeough, J. Lupart, & A. Martini (Eds.), Teachingfor transfer: Fostering generalization in learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
55. Pressley, M., El-Dinary, P. B., Gaskins, I. W., Schuder, T., Bergman, J. L., Almasi, J., et al. (1992). Beyond direct explanation: Transactional instruction of reading comprehension strategies. Elementary School Journal, 92, 513-555.
56. Pressley, M., Snyder, B. L., & Carglia-Bull, T. (1987). How can good strategy use be taught to children? Evaluation of six alternative approaches. In S. M. Cormier & J. D. Hagman (Eds.), Transfer of learning: Contemporary research and applications (pp. 81-119). Toronto: Academic.
57. Rcsnick, L. B., & Glaser, R. (1976). Problem solving and intelligence. In L. B. Resnick (Ed.), The nature of intelligence (pp. 205-230). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
58. Salomon, G., & Perkins, D. N. (1989). Rocky roads to transfer: Rethinking mechanisms of a neglected phenomenon. Educational Psychologist, 24, 113-142.
59. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1988). Problem solving in context(s). In R. I. Charles & E. A. Silver (Eds.), The teaching and assessing of mathematical problem solving (Vol. 3, pp. 82-92). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
60. Schumaker, J. B., & Deshler, D. D. (1992). Validation of learning strategy interventions for students with learning disabilities: Results of a programmatic research effort. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Contemporary intervention research in learning disabilities: An international perspective (pp. 22-46). New York: Springer-Verlag.
61. Schunk, D. H. (1994). Self-regulation of self-efficacy and attributions in academic settings. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 75-99). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
62. Stone, C. A. (1998). The metaphor of scaffolding: Its utility for the field of learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 31, 344-364.
63. Stone, C. A., & Reid, D. K. (1994). Social and individual forces in learning: Implications for instruction of children with learning difficulties. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 72-86.
64. Swanson, H. L. (1990). Instruction derived from the strategy deficit model: Overview of principles and procedures. In T. Scruggs & B. Y. L. Wong (Eds.), Intervention research in learning disabilities (pp. 34-65). New York: Springer-Verlag.
65. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
66. Weiner, B. (1974). An attributional interpretation of expectancy-value theory. In B. Weiner (Ed.), Cognitive views of human motivation (pp. 51-69). New York: Academic.
67. Wertsch, J. V. (1979). From social interaction to higher psychological processes: A clarification and application of Vygotsky’s theory. Human Development, 22, 1-22.
68. Wong, B. Y. L. (1991a). The relevance of metacognition to learning disabilities. In B. Y. L. Wong (Ed.), Learning about learning disabilities (pp. 231-258). San Diego, CA: Academic.
69. Wong, B. Y. L. (1991 b, August). On the thorny issue of transfer in learning disabilities interventions: Towards a three-prong solution. Invited address, Fourth European Conference for Research on Learning and Instruction, University of Turku, Turku, Finland.
70. Wong, B. Y. L. (1994). Instructional parameters promoting transfer of learned strategies in students with learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 17, 110-120.
71. Wong, B. Y. L., Wong, R., & Blenkinsop, J. (1989). Cognitive and metacognitive aspects of learning disabled adolescents composing problems. Learning Disability Quarterly, 12, 300-322.
72. Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study research: Design and methods (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
73. Zimmerman, B. J. (1989). A social-cognitive view of self-regulated learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81, 329-339.
74. Zimmerman, B. J. (1994). Dimensions of academic self-regulation: A conceptual framework for education. In D. H. Schunk & B. J. Zimmerman (Eds.), Self-regulation of learning and performance: Issues and educational applications (pp. 3-21). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
75. Zimmerman, B. J. (1995). Self-regulation involves more than metacognition: A social cognitive perspective. Educational Psychologist, 30, 217-221.