The CDIO syllabus: a comparative study of expected student proficiency

European Journal of Engineering Education

Volumn 28, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 297-315

  Bankel, Johan ^a   Berggren, Karl Fredrik ^b   Blom, Karin ^c   Crawley, Edward F ^d   Wiklund, Ingela ^b   Östlund, Sören ^c  

^a CHALMERS UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^b LINKÖPING UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^c ROYAL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Sweden)

^d MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BLENDING; ENGINEERING EDUCATION; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; PHILOSOPHICAL ASPECTS;

COMPARATIVE STUDIES; ENGINEERING PROBLEM SOLVING; INTERNATIONAL COLLABORATIONS; PROFICIENCY LEVEL; SYSTEM BUILDING; TECHNICAL EXPERTISE; TO EFFECT; UNDERGRADUATE ENGINEERING EDUCATIONS;

STUDENTS;

EID: 85069793230     PISSN: 03043797     EISSN: 14695898     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/0304379031000098274     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Accreditation Board For Engineering And Technology (ABET) 1994 Engineering Criteria 2000 Baltimore MD available at, http://www.abet.org
2. ASEE 1994 ASEE Engineering Deans Council Corporate Roundtable, Engineering Education for a Changing World Washinton, DC American Society for Engineering Education
3. Brodeur DR, Crawley EF, Ingemarsson I, Malmovist J, Ostlund S, 2002a International collaboration in the reform of engineering education Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Montreal Canada 16–19, June, available at, http://www.asee.org/conferences/proceedings/search.cfm
4. Brodeur DR, Young PW, Blair KB, 2002b Problem-based learning in aerospace engineering education Proceedings of the 2002 American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition Montreal Canada 16–19, June, available at, http://www.asee.org/conferences/proceedings/search.cfm
5. Crawley EF, 2001 The CDIO Syllabus—A Statement of Goals for Undergraduate Engineering Education Cambridge MA Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Aeronautics and Astronautics
6. Hall SR, Waitz I, Brodeur DR, Soderholm DH, Nasr R, 2002 Adoption of active learning in a lecture-based engineering class The 32nd ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference Boston MA 6–9, November
7. Haug G, Tauch C, 2001 Trends in learning structures in higher education (II) Follow-up Report prepared for the Salamanca and Prague Conferences
8. Huba ME, Freed JE, 2000 Learner-centered Assessment on College Campuses Boston MA Allyn and Baron
9. Palomba CA, Banta TW, 1999 Assessment Essentials: Planning, Implementation, and Improving Assessment for Higher Education San Francisco CA Jossey-Bass
10. Sutherland TE, Bonwell CC, (eds) 1996 Using active learning in college classes: a range of options for faculty New Directions for Teaching and Learning No. 67 San Francisco CA Jossey-Bass
11. The Boeing Company 1996 Desired attributes of an engineer: participation with universities available at, http://www.boeing.com