Development of the summary of findings table for network meta-analysis

Journal of Clinical Epidemiology

Volumn 115, Issue , 2019, Pages 1-13

  Yepes Nuñez, Juan José ^a,b   Li, Shelly Anne ^c   Guyatt, Gordon ^a,d   Jack, Susan M ^a,d   Brozek, Jan L ^a,d   Beyene, Joseph ^a   Murad, M Hassan ^e   Rochwerg, Bram ^a,d   Mbuagbaw, Lawrence ^a   Zhang, Yuan ^a   Flórez, Ivan D ^a,b   Siemieniuk, Reed A ^a   Sadeghirad, Behnam ^a   Mustafa, Reem ^a,f   Santesso, Nancy ^a   Schünemann, Holger J ^a,d  

^a MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSIDAD DE LOS ANDES   (Colombia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

^d MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^e MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Certainty of evidence; Decision making; GRADE; Network meta analysis; Summary of findings; Systematic reviews

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DATA ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; GEOMETRY; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; NETWORK META-ANALYSIS; SEMI STRUCTURED INTERVIEW; DOCUMENTATION; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PROCEDURES; RESEARCH;

ABSTRACTING AND INDEXING; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; NETWORK META-ANALYSIS; RESEARCH REPORT;

EID: 85069602775     PISSN: 08954356     EISSN: 18785921     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2019.04.018     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Caldwell, D.M., Ades, A.E., Higgins, J.P., Simultaneous comparison of multiple treatments: combining direct and indirect evidence. BMJ 331 (2005), 897–900.
2. Bafeta, A., Trinquart, L., Seror, R., Ravaud, P., Reporting of results from network meta-analyses: methodological systematic review. BMJ, 348, 2014, g1741.
3. Schünemann, H.J., Oxman, A., Vist, G.E., Higgins, J.P.T., Deeks, J.J., Glasziou, P., Guyatt, G.H., Chapter 12: interpreting results and drawing conclusions. Higgins, J.P.T.G.S., (eds.) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 510 (updated March 2011), 2008, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008 Available at www.cochrane-handbook.org.
4. Schünemann, H.J., Oxman, A., Higgins, J.P.T., Vist, G.E., Glasziou, P., Guyatt, G.H., Chapter 11: presenting results and ‘Summary of findings' tables. Higgins, J.P.T.G.S., (eds.) Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 510 (updated March 2011), 2008, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2008 Available at www.cochrane-handbook.org.
5. Guyatt, G.H., Thorlund, K., Oxman, A.D., Walter, S.D., Patrick, D., Furukawa, T.A., et al. GRADE guidelines: 13. Preparing summary of findings tables and evidence profiles-continuous outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol 66 (2013), 173–183.
6. Carrasco-Labra, A., Brignardello-Petersen, R., Santesso, N., Neumann, I., Mustafa, R.A., Mbuagbaw, L., et al. Improving GRADE evidence tables part 1: a randomized trial shows improved understanding of content in summary of findings tables with a new format. J Clin Epidemiol 74 (2016), 7–18.
7. Langendam, M., Carrasco-Labra, A., Santesso, N., Mustafa, R.A., Brignardello-Petersen, R., Ventresca, M., et al. Improving GRADE evidence tables part 2: a systematic survey of explanatory notes shows more guidance is needed. J Clin Epidemiol 74 (2016), 19–27.
8. Ioannidis, J.P., Integration of evidence from multiple meta-analyses: a primer on umbrella reviews, treatment networks and multiple treatments meta-analyses. CMAJ 181:8 (2009), 488–493.
9. Cipriani, A., Higgins, J.P., Geddes, J.R., Salanti, G., Conceptual and technical challenges in network meta-analysis. Ann Intern Med 159 (2013), 130–137.
10. Ades, A.E., Caldwell, D.M., Reken, S., Welton, N.J., Sutton, A.J., Dias, S., Evidence synthesis for decision making 7: a reviewer's checklist. Med Decis Making 33:5 (2013), 679–691.
11. Hoaglin, D.C., Hawkins, N., Jansen, J.P., Scott, D.A., Itzler, R., Cappelleri, J.C., et al. Conducting indirect-treatment-comparison and network-meta-analysis studies: report of the ispor task force on indirect treatment comparisons good research practices: part 2. Value Health 14:4 (2011), 429–437.
12. Tan, S.H., Bujkiewicz, S., Sutton, A., Dequen, P., Cooper, N., Presentational approaches used in the UK for reporting evidence synthesis using indirect and mixed treatment comparisons. J Health Serv Res Pol 18 (2013), 224–232.
13. Sullivan, S.M., Coyle, D., Wells, G., What guidance are researchers given on how to present network meta-analyses to end-users such as policymakers and clinicians? A systematic review. PLoS One, 9, 2014, e113277.
14. Hutton, B., Salanti, G., Caldwell, D.M., Chaimani, A., Schmid, C.H., Cameron, C., et al. The PRISMA extension statement for reporting of systematic reviews incorporating network meta-analyses of health care interventions: checklist and explanations. Ann Intern Med 162 (2015), 777–784.
15. Sandelowski, M., Whatever happened to qualitative description?. Res Nurs Health 23 (2000), 334–340.
16. Miles, M., Huberman, A., Qualitative data analysis: an expanded sourcebook. 2th ed., 1994, SAGE Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA.
17. Palinkas, L.A., Horwitz, S.M., Green, C.A., Wisdom, J.P., Duan, N., Hoagwood, K., Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Adm Pol Ment Health 42:5 (2015), 533–544.
18. Patton, M.Q., Chapter 5. Designing qualitative studies. Qualitative research & evaluation methods, 3rd ed., 2002, Sage Publications, Thousand Oaks, CA, 230–247.
19. Virzi, R., Refining the test phase of usability evaluation: how many subjects is enough. Hum Factors 34:4 (1992), 457–468.
20. Creswell, J.W., Five qualitative approached to inquiry. Creswell, J., (eds.) Quality inquiry & Research Design, 3rd ed., 2013, SAGE, California, 69–110.
21. Morville, P., User experience design. Available at http://www.semanticstudios.com/publications/semantics/000029.php, 2004. (Accessed 21 June 2004)
22. VERBI Software GmbH. MAXQDA. Gerson, J., (eds.) The art of data analysis, 2017, VERBI GmbH, Berlin.
23. Hsieh, H.F., Shannon, S.E., Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res 15 (2005), 1277–1288.
24. Rosenbaum, S.E., Glenton, C., Cracknell, J., User experiences of evidence-based online resources for health professionals: user testing of the cochrane library. BMC Med Inform Decis making, 8, 2008, 34.
25. Rosenbaum, S.E., Glenton, C., Nylund, H.K., Oxman, A.D., User testing and stakeholder feedback contributed to the development of understandable and useful summary of findings tables for cochrane reviews. J Clin Epidemiol 63 (2010), 607–619.
26. Rosenbaum, S.E., Glenton, C., Oxman, A.D., Summary-of-findings tables in cochrane reviews improved understanding and rapid retrieval of key information. J Clin Epidemiol 63 (2010), 620–626.
27. Elo, S., Kyngas, H., The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs 62 (2008), 107–115.
28. Reyna, V.F., How people make decisions that involve risk. A dual-processes approach. Curr Dir Psychol Sci 13:2 (2004), 60–66.
29. Lipkus, I.M., Numeric, verbal, and visual formats of conveying health risks: suggested best practices and future recommendations. Med Decis Making 27:5 (2007), 696–713.
30. Gigerenzer, G., Edwards, A., Simple tools for understanding risks: from innumeracy to insight. BMJ 327 (2003), 741–744.
31. Paling, J., Strategies to help patients understand risks. BMJ 327 (2003), 745–748.
32. Trevena, L.J., Davey, H.M., Barratt, A., Butow, P., Caldwell, P., A systematic review on communicating with patients about evidence. J Eval Clin Pract 12 (2006), 13–23.
33. Brignardello-Petersen, R., Bonner, A., Alexander, P.E., Siemieniuk, R.A., Furukawa, T.A., Rochwerg, B., et al. Advances in the GRADE approach to rate the certainty in estimates from a network meta-analysis. J Clin Epidemiol 93 (2018), 36–44.
34. Puhan, M.A., Schunemann, H.J., Murad, M.H., Li, T., Brignardello-Petersen, R., Singh, J.A., et al. A GRADE Working Group approach for rating the quality of treatment effect estimates from network meta-analysis. BMJ, 349, 2014, g5630.
35. Kibret, T., Richer, D., Beyene, J., Bias in identification of the best treatment in a Bayesian network meta-analysis for binary outcome: a simulation study. Clin Epidemiol 6 (2014), 451–460.
36. Mbuagbaw, L., Rochwerg, B., Jaeschke, R., Heels-Andsell, D., Alhazzani, W., Thabane, L., et al. Approaches to interpreting and choosing the best treatments in network meta-analyses. Syst Rev, 6(1), 2017, 79.
37. Trinquart, L., Attiche, N., Bafeta, A., Porcher, R., Ravaud, P., Uncertainty in treatment rankings: reanalysis of network meta-analyses of randomized trials. Ann Intern Med 164 (2016), 666–673.
38. Glasziou, P., Meats, E., Heneghan, C., Shepperd, S., What is missing from descriptions of treatment in trials and reviews?. BMJ 336 (2008), 1472–1474.