User experiences of evidence-based online resources for health professionals: User testing of The Cochrane Library

BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making

Volumn 8, Issue , 2008, Pages

  Rosenbaum, Sarah E ^a   Glenton, Claire ^a   Cracknell, Jane ^b  

^a NORWEGIAN KNOWLEDGE CENTRE FOR THE HEALTH SERVICES   (Norway)

^b Rigshospitalet   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COCHRANE LIBRARY; DATA BASE; DECISION MAKING; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; INTERNET; MEDICAL INFORMATICS; MEDICAL PRACTICE; ADULT; AGED; COMPUTER INTERFACE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE PERSONNEL; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; LIBRARY; LITERATURE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; ONLINE SYSTEM; UNITED KINGDOM; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

ADULT; AGED; ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH PERSONNEL; HUMANS; INFORMATION STORAGE AND RETRIEVAL; INTERNET; LIBRARIES, DIGITAL; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NORWAY; ONLINE SYSTEMS; REVIEW LITERATURE AS TOPIC; USER-COMPUTER INTERFACE;

EID: 51249105060     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14726947     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1472-6947-8-34     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Evidence based medicine: increasing, not dictating, choice. K Dickersin SE Straus LA Bero, BMJ 2007 334 suppl_1 s10 10.1136/bmj.39062.639444.94 17204750
2. Milestones on the long road to knowledge. F Godlee, BMJ 2007 334 suppl_1 s2 3 10.1136/bmj.39062.570856.94 17204760
3. The use of evidence-based medicine in the practice of consultant physicians. Results of a questionnaire survey. I Scott R Heyworth P Fairweather, Aust N Z J Med 2000 30 3 319 326 10914748
4. How to read a paper: Papers that summarise other papers (systematic reviews and meta-analyses). T Greenhalgh, BMJ 1997 315 7109 672 675 9310574
5. The Cochrane Library. TC Collaboration, http://www.thecochranelibrary.com
6. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. The Cochrane Collaboration,, Higgens JPT, Green S, http://www.cochrane-handbook.org
7. Prioritizing Web Usability. J Nielsen H Loranger, New Riders Press 1 2006
8. Observing the User Experience: A Practitioner's Guide to User Research. M Kuniavsky, Interactive Technologies Morgan Kaufmann, Kaufmann M, 1 2003 575
9. User experience - a research agenda. M Hassenzahl N Tractinsky, Behaviour & Information Technology 2006 25 2 91 997 10.1080/01449290500330331
10. User Experience Design. P Morville, honeycomb model http://www. semanticstudios.com/publications/semantics/000029.php
11. Morae. Usability Testing for Software and Web Sites http://www.techsmith. com/morae.asp
12. Web Accessibility Initiative. http://www.w3.org/WAI
13. Research-Based Web Design & Usability Guidelines. Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC, U.S. Dept. of Health and Human Services Enlarged/Expanded 2006
14. Homepage Usability: 50 Websites Deconstructed. J Nielsen M Tahir, New Riders Press 2001 336
15. Ambient Findability. P Morville, Sebastopol CA, O'Reilly Media, Inc. 2005
16. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. DL Sackett WMC Rosenberg JAM Gray RB Haynes WS Richardson, BMJ 1996 312 7023 71 72 8555924
17. Usability evaluation of an NHS library website. C Ebenezer, Health Information and Libraries Journal Health Libraries Group 2003 20 134 142 10.1046/j.1365-2532.2003.00450.x
18. How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites? BJ Fogg S Cathy RD David M Leslie S Julianne RT Ellen, Consumer Reports WebWatch Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab, Cordura Hall 226, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif., 94305 2002 http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/dynamic/web-credibility- reports-evaluate-abstract.cfm
19. Experts vs. online consumers: a comparative credibility study of health and finance web sites. J Stanford E Tauber BJ Fogg L Marable, Consumer Reports WebWatch Consumers Union of U.S. Inc. 2002
20. Ten usability heuristics. J Nielsen, http://www.useit.com/papers/ heuristic/heuristic_list.html
21. Stanford guidelines for web credibility. A research summary from the stanford persuasive technology lab. BJ Fogg, http://www.webcredibility.org/ guidelines
22. Information foraging. P Pirolli S Card, Psychological Review 1999 106 4 643 675 10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.643
23. Information foraging: why google makes people leave your site faster. J Nielsen, http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20030630.html
24. Qualitative research in health care: analysing qualitative data. C Pope S Ziebland N Mays, BMJ 2000 7227 114 116 10.1136/bmj.320.7227.114