Europe is not where it is supposed to be

International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration: Power, Security and Community

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages 14-32

  Walker, R B J ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85069550402     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9780203187807-1     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Agnew, J.A. (1994) ‘Timeless Space and State-Centricism: The Geographical Assumptions of International Relations Theory’, in S.J. Rosow, N. Inayatullah and M. Rupert (eds) The Global Economy as Political Space, Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, pp. 87-106.
2. Agnew, J.A. and Corbridge, S. (1995) Mastering Space: Hegemony, Territory and International Political Economy, London: Routledge.
3. Ashley, R.K. (1988) ‘Untying the Sovereign State: A Double Reading of the Anarchy Problematique’, Millennium: Journal of International Studies vol. 17, pp. 227-62.
4. Ashley, R.K. and Walker, R.B.J. (1990) ‘Reading Dissidence/Writing the Discipline: Crisis and the Question of Sovereignty in International Studies’, International Studies Quarterly vol. 34, pp. 367-416.
5. Barlelson, J. (1995) A Genealogy ofSovereignty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Biersteker, T.J. and Weber, C. (eds) (1996) State Sovereignty as Social Construct, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Braidotti, R. (1994) Nomadic Subjects: Embodiment and Sexual Difference in Contemporary Feminist Theory, New York: Columbia University Press.
8. Brown, W. (1995) ‘Finding the Man in the State’, in W. Brown (ed.) States of Injury: Power and Freedom in Late Modernity, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, pp. 166-96.
9. Butler, J. (1993) Bodies that Matter: On the Discursive Matter of ‘Sex’, New York: Routledge.
10. Butler, J. (1997) The Psychic Life of Power, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
11. Butler, J. and Scott, J. (eds) (1992) Feminists Theorize the Political, New York: Routledge.
12. Cadava, E., Connor, P. and Nancy, J.L. (eds) (1991) Who Comes After the Subject?, London: Routledge.
13. Campbell, D. (1992) Writing Security, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
14. Casey, E.S. (1997) The Fate of Place: A Philosophical History, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
15. Collingwood, R.G. (1960) The Idea of Nature, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
16. Connolly, W. (1995) The Ethos of Pluralization, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
17. Corlett, W. (1989) Community Without Unity, Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
18. Der Derian, J. (1992) Antidiplomacy: Spies, Terror, Speed and War, Oxford: Blackwell.
19. Diez, T. (1999) ‘Speaking '‘Europe’': The Politics of Integration Discourse’, Journal of European Public Policy vol. 6, no. 4, pp. 598-613.
20. Doty, R.L. (1996a) ‘The Double-Writing of Statecraft: Exploring State Responses to Illegal Immigration’, Alternatives vol. 21 no. 2, April-June, pp. 171-89.
21. Doty, R.L. (1996b) ‘Sovereignty and the Nation: Constructing the Boundaries of National Identity’, in T.J. Biersteker and C. Weber (eds) State Sovereignty as Social Construct, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Elliot, A. (1996) Subject To Ourselves: Social Theory, Psychoanalysis and Post-modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
23. Enzensberger, H.M. (1994) Civil Wars: From L.A. to Bosnia, New York: The New Press.
24. Grosz, E. (1995) Space, Time and Perversion: Essays on the Politics of Bodies, London: Routledge.
25. Haas, E. (1970) ‘The Study of Regional Integration: Reflections on the Joy and Anguish of Pretheorizing’, International Organization vol. 24, no. 4, Autumn, pp. 607-46.
26. Habermas, J. (1992) ‘Citizenship and National Identity: Some Relections on the Future’, Praxis International vol. 12, no. 1, April, pp. 1-19.
27. Hansen, L. and Williams, M.C. (1999) ‘The Myths of Europe: Legitimacy, Community and the '‘Crisis’' of the EU’, Journal of Common Market Studies vol. 37, no. 2, June, pp. 233-49.
28. Heller, T.C., Sosna, M. and Wellberry, D.E. (eds) (1986) Reconstructing Individualism: Autonomy, Individuality, and the Self in Western Thought, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
29. Hinsley, F.H. (1966) Sovereignty, London: C.A. Watts.
30. Krasner, S. (1989) ‘Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective’, in J. Caporaso (ed.) The Elusive State: International and Institutional Perspectives, Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
31. Lewis, M.W. and Wigen, K.E. (1997) The Myth of Continents: A Critique of Meta-geography, Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
32. Linklater, A. (1982) Men and Citizens in the Theory of International Relations, London: Macmillan.
33. Linklater, A. (1998) The Transformation of Political Community, Cambridge: Polity Press.
34. McClintock, A., Mufti, A. and Shohat, E. (eds) (1997) Dangerous Liaisons: Gender, Nation, and Postcolonial Perspectives, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
35. Marks, G., Hooghe, L. and Blank, K. (1996), ‘European Integration from the 1980s: State-Centric v. Multi-level Governance’, Journal of Common Market Studies vol. 34, no. 3, September, pp. 341-79.
36. Melucci, A. (1996) The Playing Self: Person and Meaning in the Planetary Society, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Miller, T. (1993) The Well-Tempered Self: Citizenship, Culture, and the Postmodern Subject, Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
38. Moravcsik, A. (1999) ‘The Future of European Integration Studies: Social Science or Social Theory?', Millennium: Journal of International Studies vol. 28, no. 2, pp. 371-91.
39. Morgan, E.S. (1988) Inventing the People: The Rise of Popular Sovereignty in England and America, New York: Norton.
40. Nandy, A. (1983) The Intimate Enemy: Loss and Recovery of Self Under Colonialism, Delhi: Oxford University Press.
41. Onuf, N.G. (1991) ‘Sovereignty: Outline of a Conceptual History’, Alternatives vol. 16, no. 4, Fall, pp. 425-46.
42. Pentland, C. (1973) International Relations Theory and European Integration, London: Faber and Faber.
43. Pletch, C.E. (1981) ‘The Three Worlds, or the Division of Scientific Labor, circa 1950-1975', Comparative Studies in Society and History vol. 23, pp. 565-90.
44. Rajchman, J. (ed.) (1995) The Identity in Question, London: Routledge.
45. Shapiro, M. (1991) ‘Sovereignty and Exchange in the Orders of Modernity’, Alternatives vol. 16, no. 4, Fall, pp. 447-77.
46. Shapiro, M. and Alker, H.R. (eds) (1996) Challenging Boundaries: Global Flows, Territorial Identities, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
47. Shildrick, M. (1997) Leaky Bodies and Boundaries: Feminism, Postmodernism and (Bio)Ethics, London: Routledge.
48. Smith, A. (1992) ‘National Identity and the Idea of European Unity’, International Affairs vol. 68, no. 1, pp. 55-76.
49. Spruyt, H. (1994) The Sovereign State and its Competitors, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
50. Sylvester, C. (1996) ‘The Contributions of Feminist Theory to International Relations’, in S. Smith, K. Booth and M. Zalewski (eds) International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 254-78.
51. Thomson, J.E. (1994) Mercenaries, Pirates and Sovereigns, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
52. Tully, J. (1995) Strange Multiplicity: Constitutionalism in an Age of Diversity, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
53. Vree de, J.K. (1972) Political Integration: The Formation of Theory and its Problems, The Hague: Mouton.
54. Vries de, H. and Weber, S. (eds) (1997) Violence, Identity and Self-Determination, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
55. Walker, R.B.J. (1993) Inside/Outside: International Relations as Political Theory, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Walker, R.B.J. (1997) ‘The Subject of Security’, in K. Krause and M.C. Williams (eds) Critical Security Studies: Concepts and Cases, Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, pp. 61-82.
57. Walker, R.B.J. (1999) ‘Citizenship and the Modern Subject’, in K. Hutchings and R. Dann-reuther (eds) Cosmopolitan Citizenship, London: Macmillan, pp. 171-200.
58. Weber, C. (1995) Simulating Sovereignty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59. Weiler, J.H.H. (1996) Legitimacy and Democracy of Union Governance: The 1996 Intergovernmental Agenda and Beyond, Working Paper No. 22/96, Oslo: ARENA, Research Council of Norway.