Phrase Completion Scales

Encyclopedia of Social Measurement

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 53-62

  Hodge, David R ^a   Gillespie, David F ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

^b WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85069293707     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1016/B0-12-369398-5/00124-9     Document Type: Chapter

References (7)

1. Barnette J.J. Effects of stem and Likert response option reversals on survey internal consistency: If you feel the need, there is a better alternative to using those negatively worded stems. Educational Psychol. Measurement 2000, 60(3):361-370.
2. Brody C.J., Dietz J. On the dimensionality of two-question format Likert attitude scales. Social Sci. Res. 1997, 26(2):197-204.
3. Chang L. A psychometric evaluation of 4-point and 6-point Likert-type scales in relation to reliability and validity. Appl. Psychol. Measurement 1994, 18(3):205-215.
4. Garg R.K. The influence of positive and negative wording and issue involvement on responses to Likert scales in marketing research. J. Market Res. Soc. 1996, 38(3):235-256.
5. Krosnick J.A., Fabrigar L.R. Designing rating scales for effective measurement in surveys. Survey Measurement and Process Quality 1997, 141-164. Wiley, New York. L. Lyberg, P. Biemer, M. Collins, E. De Leeuw, C. Dippo, N. Schwarz, D. Trewin (Eds.).
6. Roberts J.S., Laughlin J.E., Wedell D.H. Validity issues in the Likert and Thurstone approaches to attitude measurement. Educational Psychol. Measurement 1999, 59(2):211-233.
7. Russell C.J., Bobko P. Moderated regression analysis and Likert scales: Too coarse for comfort. J. Appl. Psychol. 1992, 77(3):336-342.