Misunderstandings: Interactional structure and strategic resources

Misunderstanding in Social Life: Discourse Approaches to Problematic Talk

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 57-81

  Hinnenkamp, Volker ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85069291015     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (53)

1. Agar, M. (1993). Language shock. Understanding the culture of conversation. New York: William Morrow
2. Agar, M. (1994). The intercultural frame. In International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 18, 221-237
3. Allwood, J. and Abelar, Y. (1989). Lack of understanding, misunderstanding and language acquisition. In G. Extra and M. M ittner (eds), Studies in second language acquisition by adult immigrants. Proceedings of the ESF/AILA symposium held on the 9th of August in Brussels. Tilburg: Tilburg University, 27-55
4. Auer, R (1986). Kontextualisierung. In Studiwn Linguistik, 19, 22-47
5. Auer, P. (1992). Introduction: John Gum perz' approach to contextualization. In R Auer and A. di Luzio (eds), The contextualization of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 1-37
6. Bilmes, J. (1992). Mishearings. In G. Watson and R. M. Seiler (eds), Text in context. Contributions to ethnomethodology. Newbury" Park, CA: Sage, 79-98
7. Bremer, K. (1996). Causes of understanding problems. In K. Bremer, C. Roberts, M.-T. Vasseur, M. Simonot and P. Broeder (eds), Achieving understanding: Discourse in intercultural encounters. London: Longman, 37-64
8. Bremer, K. and Simonot, M. (1996a). Preventing problems of understanding. In K. Bremer, C. Roberts, M.-T. Vasseur, M. Simonot and P. Broeder (eds), Achieving understanding: Discourse in intercultural encounters. London: Longman, 159-180
9. Bremer, K. and Simonot, M. (1996b). Joint negotiation of understanding: Procedures for managing problems of understanding. In K. Bremer, C. Roberts, M.-T. Vasseur, M. Simonot and P. Broeder (eds), Achieving imderstandifig: Discourse in intercultural encowiters. London: Longman, 181-206
10. Cushing, S. (1994). Fatal words. Communication clashes and aircraft crashes. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
11. Dascal, M. (1985). The relevance of misunderstanding. In M. Dascal (ed.), Dialogue-an interdisciplinary approach. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 441-459
12. Dobrick, Al. (1985). Gegenseitiges (Miβ-)Verstehen in der dyadischen Kommimikation. Munster: Aschendorff
13. Drummond, K. and Hopper, R. (1991). Misunderstanding and its remedies: Telephone miscommunication. In N. Coupland, J. Al. Wiemann and H. Giles (eds), 'Miscommunication' and problematic talk. London: Sage, 301-314
14. Erickson, F. and Shultz, J. (1982). The counselor as gatekeeper. Social interaction in interviews. New York: Academic Press
15. Falkner, W. (1997). Verstehen, Mifivei'stehen und Mifiverstandnisse. Tubingen: Niemeyer
16. Gass, S. Al. and Varonis, E. Al. (1991). Aliscommunication in nonnative speaker discourse. In N. Coupland, J. M. W iemann and H. Giles (eds), 'Miscommunication ' and problematic talk. London: Sage, 121-145
17. Goffman, E. (1971). Relations in public. Microstudies of the public order. N ew York: H arper & Row
18. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole and J. L. Alorgan (eds), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts. New York: Academic Press, 41-58
19. Grimshaw, A. D. (1980). Alishearings, misunderstandings, and other nonsuccesses in talk: A plea for redress of speaker-oriented bias. In Sociological Inquiry, 50 (3/4), 31-74
20. Gumperz, J. J. (1982a). Discourse strategies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
21. Gumperz, J. J. (ed.) (1982b). Language and social identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
22. Gumperz, J. J. (1989). Contextualization cues and metapragmatics: The retrieval of cultural knowledge. In B. Alusic, R. Grascyk and C. Wiltshire (eds), CLS 25, Papers from the 25th annual regional meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society. Part Two: Parasession on language in context. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society 77-88
23. Gumperz, J. J. (1992a). Contextualization revisited. In P. Auer and A. di Luzio (eds), The con textualization of language. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 39-53
24. Gumperz, J. J. (1992b). Contextualization and understanding. In A. Duranti and C. Goodwin (eds), Rethinking context. New York: Cambridge University Press, 229-252
25. Gumperz, J. J. (1995). Alutual inferencing in conversation. In I. Markova, C. F. Graumann and K. Foppa (eds), Mutualities in dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 101-123
26. Gumperz, J. J. and Cook-Gumperz, J. (1981). Ethnic differences in communicative style. In C. A. Ferguson and S. B. H eath (eds), Language in the USA. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 430-445
27. Gumperz, J. J. and Roberts, C. (1978). Developing awareness skills for interethnic communication. Southall: NCILT (also published 1980 as Occasional Papers No. 12 of the SEAA1EO Regional Language Centre, Singapore)
28. Gumperz, J. J. and Roberts, C. (1991). Understanding in intercultural encounters. In J. Blommaert and J. Verschueren (eds), The pragmatics of intercultural and international communication. Selected papers of the hiternational Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp, August 17-22, 1987, Volume 3, and the Ghent Symposium on Intercultural Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 51-90
29. Gumperz, J. J., Jupp, T. C. and Roberts, C. (1979). Crosstalk. A study of cross-cultural communication. Background material and notes to accompany the BBC film. Southall: NCILT
30. Hinnenkamp, V. (1989). Interaktionale Soziolinguistik und Interkulturelle Kommunikation. Gesprachsmanagement zwischen Deutschen und Tiirken. Tubingen: Niemeyer
31. Hinnenkamp, V (1991): Talking a person into interethnic distinction: A discourse analytic case study. In J. Blommaert and J. Verschueren (eds), The pragmatics of intercultural and international communication. Selected papers of the International Pragmatics Conference, Antwerp, August 17-22, 1987, Volume 3, and the Ghent Symposium on Intercultural Communication. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 91-110
32. Hinnenkamp, V (1995). Intercultural communication. In J. Verschueren, J.-O. Ostman and J. Blommaert (eds), Handbook of pragmatics 199 S. Amsterdam: John Benjamins
33. Hinnenkamp, V (1998). Mifiverstandnisse in Gesprachen. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag
34. Hinnenkamp, V (2002). The notion of misunderstanding in intercultural communication. In J. Allwood and B. Dorriots (eds), The diversity of intercultural communication. Selected papers. 5th N IC Symposium Gothenburg, Sweden. (= Papers in Anthropological Linguistics 28). Goteborg: Goteborg University, Dept, of Linguistics, 55-88
35. House, J. (1993a). Mifiverstehen im interkulturellen Diskurs. In J. R Timm and H. Vollmer (eds), Kontroversen in der Fremdsprachenforschung. Bochum: Brockmeyer, 178-196
36. House, J. (1993b). Towards a model for the analysis of inappropriate responses in native/non-native interactions. In G. Kasper and S. Blum-Kulka (eds), Interlanguage pragmatics. New York: Oxford University Press, 161-183
37. House, J. (1996). Contrastive discourse analysis and misunderstanding: The case of German and English. In M. Hellinger and U. Ammon (eds), Contrastive sociolinguistics. Berlin: M outon de Gruyter, 345-361
38. Humphrey-Jones, C. (1986). An investigation of the types and structure of misunderstandings. Dissertation, University of Newcastle upon Tyne
39. Ichheiser, G. (1949). Misunderstanding in human relations: A study in false social perception. [Supplement] In American Journal of Sociology, 55(2), Pt. 2
40. Knapp, K., Enninger, W. and Knapp-Potthoff, A. (eds) (1987). Analyzing intercultural communication. The Hague: M outon de Gruyter
41. Linell, P. (1995). Troubles with mutualities: Towards a dialogical theory of misunderstanding and miscommunication. In I. Markova, C. F. Graumann and K. Foppa (eds), Mutualities in dialogue. Cambridge: Cambridge LTniversity Press, 176-213
42. Linell, P. and Luckmann, T. (1991). Asymmetries in dialogue: Some conceptual preliminaries. In I. Markova and K. Foppa (eds), Asymmetries in dialogue. Hemel Hempstead: Harvester Wheatsheaf, 1-20
43. Loretz, N. (1976). Verstandigung und Missverstehen: Versuch einer semantischpragmatischen Analyse an schweizerdeutschen und hochsprachlichen Texten. Frauenfeld, Stuttgart: Huber
44. Mudersbach, K. (1987). Kommunizieren als Ubersetzungsproblem. U ber Mifiverstandnisse und deren Verhinderung. In F. Liedtke and R. Keller (eds), Kommunikation und Kooperation. Tubingen: Niemeyer, 239-247
45. Roberts, C., Davies, E. and Jupp, T. (1993). Language and discrimination. A study of mmnunication in multi-ethnic workplaces. London: Longman
46. Schegloff, E. A. (1987). Some sources of misunderstanding in talk-in-interaction. In Linguistics, 25, 201-218
47. Schegloff, E. A. (1992). Repair after next turn: The last structurally provided defense of intersubjectivity in conversation. In American Journal of Sociology, 97(5), 1295-1345
48. Schwartz, H. (1977). Understanding misunderstanding. In Analytic Sociology, 3 [quoted by Humphrey-Jones, 1986]
49. Smedslund, J. (1990). A critique of Tversky and Kahneman's distinction between fallacy and misunderstanding. In Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 31, 110-120
50. Varonis, E. M. and Gass, S. M. (1985). Miscommunication in native/nonnative conversation. In Language in Society, 14, 327-343
51. Weizman, E. and Blum-Kulka, S. (1992). Ordinary misunderstanding. In M. Stamenov (ed.), Cmrent advances in semantic theoiy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 417-432
52. W iliam s, T. (1985). The nature of miscommunication in the cross-cultural employm ent interview. In J. B. Pride (ed.), Cross-cultural encounters. Cojmnunication and mis-cormmmication. Melbourne: River Seine, 165-175
53. Zaefferer, D. (1977). Understanding misunderstanding: A proposal for an explanation of reading choices. Yn Journal of Pragmatics, 1, 329-346