A method for quantifying size and shape dimensions of North American hafted bifaces

Lithic Analysis at the Millennium

Volumn , Issue , 2016, Pages 173-188

  Bradbury, Andrew P ^a   Carr, Philip J ^b  

^a University of South Alabama ^*  (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85068640912     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Adams, W. Y. 1988. 'Archaeological classification: Theory versus practice.' Antiquity 62(234): 40-56
2. Barton, C. M. & G. A. C lark (eds.) 1997. Rediscovering Darwin: Evolutionary Theory and Archaeological Explanation. Archaeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association No. 7. American Anthropological Association, Arlington
3. Baxter, M. J. 1994. Exploratory Multivariate Analysis in Archaeology. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh
4. Beck, C. & G. T. Jones 1989. 'Bias and archaeological classification.' American Antiquity 54: 224-62
5. Bettinger, R. L. & J. E erkens 1997. 'Evolutionary implications of metrical variation in Great Basin projectile points.' In Barton & Clark (1997), pp. 177-91
6. Bradbury, A. P. 1997. 'The bow and arrow in the Eastern Woodlands: Evidence for an Archaic origin.' North American Archaeologist 18(3): 207-34
7. Bradbury, A. P. & P. J. C arr 1997. Towards an Explanation of Variation in Hafted Bifaces: An Early Holocene Example. Paper presented at the 54th annual Southeastern Archaeological Conference, Baton Rouge, Louisiana
8. Broyles, B. J. 1966. 'Preliminary report: The St Albans site (46KA27), Kanawha County, West Virginia.' The West Virginia Archaeologist 19: 1-43
9. B ro yles, B. J. 1971. Second Preliminary Report: The St Albans Site, Kanawha County, West Virginia, 1964-1968. Report of Archeological Investigations No. West Virginia Geological and Economic Survey, Morgantown
10. Carr, P. J. 1995. Hunter-Gatherers, Mobility, and Technological Organization: The Early Archaic of East Tennessee. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Anthropology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
11. Chapman, J. 1973. The Icehouse Bottom Site, 40MR23. Report of Investigations 13. University of Tennessee, Department of Anthropology, Knoxville
12. Chapman, J. 1975. The Rose Island Site and The Bifurcate Point Tradition. Report of Investigations 1. University of Tennessee, Department of Anthropology, Knoxville
13. Chapman, J. 1977. Archaic Period Research in the Lower Little Tennessee River Valley, 1975: Icehouse Bottom, Harrison Branch, Thirty Acre Island, Calloway Island. Report of Investigations 18. University of Tennessee, Department of Anthropology, Knoxville
14. Chapman, J. 1978. The Bacon Farm Site and a Buried Site Reconnaissance. Report of Investigations 23 and Tennessee Valley Authority Publications in Anthropology No. 21. The University of Tennessee, Department of Anthropology, Knoxville
15. Chapman, J. 1979. The Howard and Calloway Island Sites. Report of Investigations 27 and Tennessee Valley Authority, Publications in Anthropology No. 23. The University of Tennessee, Department of Anthropology, Knoxville
16. Christenson, A. L. 1986. 'Projectile point size and projectile aerodynamics: An exploratory study.' Plains Anthropologist 31: 109-28
17. Coe, J. L. 1964. 'The formative cultures of the Carolina Piedmont.' Transactions of the American Philosophical Society 54(5): 1-130
18. Cotterell, B. & J. K amminga 1990. Mechanics of Pre-Industrial Technology. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
19. Darroch, J. & J. Mosimann 1985. 'Canonical and Principal Components of shape.' Biometrika 72(2): 241-52
20. Dunnell, R. C. 1971. Systematics in Prehistory. Free Press, New York
21. Dunnell, R. C. 1986. 'Methodological issues in Americanist artifact classification.' Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 9: 149-207
22. Dunnell, R. C. 1992. 'Archaeology and evolutionary science.' In L. Wandsnider (ed.), Quandaries and Quests: Visions of Archaeology's Future, Occasional Paper No. 20, pp. 209-24. Center for Archaeological Investigations, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale
23. Fatti, L. P., D. M. Hawkins & E. L. R aath 1982. 'Discriminant Analysis.' In D. M. Hawkins (ed.), Topics in Applied Multivariate Analysis, pp. 1-71. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
24. Faulkner, C. H. & M. C. R. Mc C ollough 1973. Introductory Report of the Normandy Reservoir Salvage Project: Environmental Setting, Typology and Survey. Tennessee Valley Authority Publications in Anthropology No. 4, and Normandy Archaeological Project Vol. 1, Report of Investigations No. 11
25. Tennessee Valley Authority and Department of Anthropology, University of Tennessee, Chattanooga and Knoxville
26. Fish, P. R. 1978. 'Consistency in archaeological measurement and classification: A pilot study.' American Antiquity 43: 86-9
27. Flenniken, J. J. 1985. 'Stone tool reduction techniques as cultural markers.' In M. G. Plew, J. C. Woods & M. G. Pavesic (eds.), Stone Tool Analysis: Essays in Honor of Don E. Crabtree, pp. 265-76. University of New Mexico Press, Albuquerque
28. Flenniken, J. J. & A. W. R aymond 1986. 'Morphological projectile point typology: Replication, experimentation, and technological analysis.' American Antiquity 51: 603-14
29. Friis-Hansen, J. 1990. 'Mesolithic cutting arrows: Functional analysis of arrows used in the hunting of large game.' Antiquity 64: 494-504
30. Goodyear, A. C. 1974. The Brand Site: A Techno-Functional Study of a Dalton Site in Northeast Arkansas. Publications on Archaeology, Research Series No. Arkansas Archaeological Survey
31. G unn, J. & E. P rew itt 1975. 'Automatic classification: Projectile points from West Texas.' Plains Anthropologist 20: 139-50
32. Ha l l, C. L. 1992. Exploring Archaic Settlement in the Midsouth: The Surface Archaeology of Cannon and Cheek Bends of the Duck River, Tennessee. Ph.D. thesis, Department of Anthropology, The University of Tennessee, Knoxville
33. Henton, G. H. & S. R. Durand 1991. 'Projectile point measurement and classification using digital image processing.' Journal of Quantitative Anthropology 3: 53-82
34. Hoffman, C. H. 1985. 'Projectile point maintenance and projectile point typology: Assessment with factor analysis and canonical correlation.' In C. Carr (ed.), For Concordance in Archaeological Analysis, pp. 566-612. Westport Publishers, Inc. University of Arkansas, Fayetteville
35. Hughes, S. S. 1998. 'Getting to the point: Evolutionary change in prehistoric weaponry.' Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 5(4): 345-408
36. Johnson, J. K. 1993. 'Lithics.' In J. K. Johnson (ed.), The Development of Southeastern Archaeology, pp. 36-52. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama
37. Johnson, R. A. k D. W. W ichern 1992. Applied Multivariate Statistical Analysis. Prentice Hall, New Jersey, third edition
38. Justice, N. D. 1987. Stone Age Spear and Arrow Points of the Midcontinental and Eastern United States: A Modern Survey and Reference. Indiana University Press, Bloomington and Indianapolis
39. Keeley, L. H. 1982. 'Hafting and retooling: Effects on the archaeological record.' American Antiquity 47(4): 798-809
40. Kidder, J. H., R. L. J antz k F. H. Smith 1992. 'Defining modern humans: A multivariate approach.' In G. Brauer k F. H. Smith (eds.), Continuity or Replacement? Controversies in Homo sapiens Evolution, pp. 157-77. A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam
41. Kimball, L. R. 1994. Upper Cumberland Archaic and Woodland Period Archeology at the Main Site (15BL35), Bell County, Kentucky, volume 2, chapter Appendix F: Microwear Analysis of Archaic and Early Woodland Tools from the Main Site (15BL35), pp. 94-6. Cultural Resource Analysts, Publication Series, Lexington, Kentucky
42. Kimball, L. R. 1996. 'Early Archaic settlement and technology: Lessons from Tellico.' In D. G. Anderson k K. E. Sassaman (eds.), The Paleoindian and Early Archaic Southeast, pp. 149-86. The University of Alabama Press, Tuscaloosa, Alabama
43. Klecka, W. R. 1980. Discriminant Analysis. Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, Sage University Paper, 19. Sage
44. Kneberg, M. D. 1956. 'Some important projectile point types found in the Tennessee area.' Tennessee Archaeologist 12(1): 25
45. McEwen, E., R. C. Miller k C. A. B ergman 1991. 'Early bow design and construction.' Scientific American 265(6): 76-82
46. Odell, G. H. 1996. 'Economizing behavior and the concept of "curation".' In G. H. Odell (ed.), Stone Tools: Theoretical Insights into Human Prehistory, pp. 51-80. Plenum Press, New York
47. Odell, G. H. & F. Cowan 1986. 'Experiments with spears and arrows on animal targets.' Journal of Field Archaeology 13: 195-212
48. Shennan, S. J. 1997. Quantifying Archaeology. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh, second edition
49. Shott, M. J. 1993. 'Spears, darts, and arrows: Late Woodland hunting techniques in the Upper Ohio Valley.' American Antiquity 58(3): 425-43
50. Shott, M. J. 1997. 'Transmission theory in the study of stone tools: A Midwestern example.' In Barton k Clark (1997), pp. 193-206
51. Sullivan, A. P. k K. C. Rozen 1985. 'Debitage analysis and archaeological interpretation.' American Antiquity 50: 755-79
52. Thomas, D. H. 1981. 'How to classify the projectile points from Monitor Valley, Nevada.' Journal of California and Great Basin Archaeology 3(1): 7-43
53. Thomas, D. H. 1986. 'Points on points: A reply to Flenniken and Raymond.' American Antiquity 51(3): 619-27
54. Thoms, A. V. 1993. 'Knocking sense from old rocks: Typologies and the narrow perspective of the Angostura point type.' Lithic Technology 18(1-2): 16-27
55. Titmus, G. L. k J. C. W oods 1986. 'An experimental study of projectile point fracture patterns.' Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 8(1): 37-49
56. Tomka, S. A. k E. R. P rewitt 1993. 'Projectile point types and archaeological interpretations from Texas.' Lithic Technology 18(1-2): 49-58
57. Towner, R. H. k M. Warburton 1990. 'Projectile point rejuvenation: A technological analysis.' Journal of Field Archeology 17: 311-21
58. Trigger, B. C. 1989. A History of Archaeological Thought. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
59. Whittaker, J. C., D. Caulkins k K. A. Kamp 1998. 'Evaluating consistency in typology and classification.' Journal of Archaeological Method and Theory 5(2): 129-64