Evolutionary implications of metrical variation in great basin projectile points

Archeological Papers of the American Anthropological Association

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 177-191

  Bettinger, Robert L ^a   Eerkens, Jeltner ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842789336     PISSN: 1551823X     EISSN: 15518248     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1525/ap3a.1997.7.1.177     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Aikens, C. M., and Y. Witherspoon., 1986 Great Basin Numic Prehistory. Linguistics, Archaeology, and Environment In Anthropology of the Desert West: Essays in Honor of Jesse D. Jennings (C. S.Condie & D. D.Fowler, eds.), pp. 7-20. Salt Lake City: Anthropological Papers No. 110. University of Utah.
2. Baumhoff, M. A., and J. S. Byrne., 1959 Desert Side-notched Points as a Time Marker in California. Archaeological Survey Reports No. 48, pp. 32-65. Berkeley: University of California.
3. Beck, C., 1984 Stem Mountain Surface Archaeology: The Sites. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Washington.
4. Bettinger, R. L., 1987 Archaeological Approaches to Hunter-gatherers. Annual Re-view of Anthropology 16: 121-142.
5. Bettinger, R. L., 1980 Explanatory/predictive Models of Hunter-gatherer Adaptation. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 3: 189-255. New York: Academic Press.
6. Bettinger, R. L., 1991 Hunter-Gatherers: Archaeological and Evolutionary Theory. New York: Plenum.
7. Binford, L. R., 1977a General Introduction. In For Theory Building in Archaeology (L R.Binford, ed), pp. 1-10. New York: Academic Press.
8. Binford, L. R., 1977b Forty-seven Trips: A Case Study in the Character of Archaeological Formation Processes. In Stone Tools as Cultural Markers: Change, Evolution, and Complexity (R. V. S.Wright, ed), pp. 24-36. Canberra: Australian Institute of Aboriginal Studies.
9. Binford, L. R., 1978a Nunamiut Ethnoarchaeology. New York: Academic Press.
10. Binford, L. R., 1978b Dimensional Analysis of Behavior and Site Structure: Learning From an Eskimo Hunting Stand. American Antiquity 43: 330-361.
11. Binford, L. R., 1979 Organization and Formation Processes: Looking at curated technologies. Journal of Anthropological Research 35: 255-273.
12. Boyd R, & Richerson, P. J., 1985 Culture and the Evolutionary Process. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
13. Boyd R, & Richerson, P. J., 1987 The Evolution of Ethnic Markers. Cultural Anthropology 2: 65-79.
14. Clewlow, C. W., 1967 Time and Space Relations of Some Great Basin Projectile Point Types. Archaeological Survey Reports No. 70: 141-150. Berkeley: University of California.
15. Conover, W. J., Mark E. Johnson., & Myrie M. Johnson., 1981 A Comparative Study of Tests for Homogeneity of Variances, with Applications to the Outer Continental Shelf Bidding Data. Technometria: 23: 351-361.
16. Ericson, J. E., 1982 Production for Obsidian Exchange in California. In Contexts for Prehistoric Exchange (J. E.Ericson & T. K.Earle, eds.), pp. 129-148. New York: Academic Press.
17. Dunnell, R., 1980 Evolutionary Theory and Archaeology. Advances in Archaeological Method and Theory 3: 35-99.
18. Fenenga, Franklin., 1953 Weights of Chipped Stone Points: a Clue to Their Functions. Southwestern Journal of Anthropology 9: 309-323.
19. Goddard, I., 1903-1904 Life and Culture of the Hupa. Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 1(1). Berkeley: University of California.
20. Grayson, D. K., 1986 Eoliths, Archaeological Ambiguity, and the Generation of “Middle-Range” Research. In American Archaeology: Past and Future (D. J.Meltzer & D. D.Fowler, eds.), pp. 77-133. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
21. Heizer, Robert F., & M. A. Baumhoff., 1961 Archaeology of Two Sites at Eastgate, Churchill County, Nevada: I Wagon Jack Sheltter. Antbropolqgical Records 20: 119-138.
22. Heizer, Robert F., & M. A. Baumhoff., 1962 Prehistoric Rock Art of Nevada and Eastern California. Berkeley: University California Press.
23. Heizer, Robert F., Martin A. Baumhoff, & C.W. Clewlow, Jr. 1968 Archaeology of South Fork Shelter (Nv-El-11), Elko County, Nevada. Archaeological Survey Report No. 71, pp. 1-58. Berkeley: University of California.
24. Heizer, Robert F., & C.W. Clewlow, Jr. 1968 Projectile Points From the Site NV-CH-15, Churchill County, Nevada. Archaeological Survey Report No. 71, pp. 59-88. Berkeley: University of California.
25. Heizer, R. F., and T. R. Hester., 1978 Great Basin. In Chronologies in New World Archaeology (R. E.Taylor & C. W.Meighan, eds.), pp. 147-199. New York: Academic Press.
26. Hester, T. R., 1973 Chronological Ordering of Great Basin Prehistory. University of California Archaeological Research Facility Contributions No. 17. Berkeley: University of California.
27. Holmer, R. N., 1978 A Mathematical Typology for Archaic Projectile Points of the Eastern Great Basin. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Utah.
28. Holmer, R. N. 1986 Common Projectile Points of the Intermountain WestInAnthropology of the Desert West Essays in honor of Jesse D. Jennings (C. Condie., & D. Fowler., eds.). Anthropological Papers 110: 89-116.
29. Kroeber, T., 1976 Ishi In Two Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
30. Lanning, Edward P., 1963 Archaeology of the Rose Spring Site Iny-372. Publications in American Archaeology and Ethnology 49: 237-336.
31. O’Connell, J. F., 1967 Elko Eared/Elko Corner-notched Projectile Points as Time Markers in the Great Basin. Archaeological Survey Reports 70: 129-140.
32. O’Connell, J. F., 1975 Prehistory of Surprise Valley. Palo Alto: Ballena Press Anthropological Papers No. 4.
33. O’Connell, J. F., and C. M. Inoway., 1994 Surprise Valley Projectile Points and Their Chronological Implications. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 16: 162-198.
34. Orans, M., 1975 Domesticating the Functional Fragon: An Analysis of Piddocke’s Potlatch. American Anthropologist 77: 312-328.
35. Pruett-Jones, S., 1992 Independent Versus Nonindependent Mate Choice: Do Females Copy Each Other. American Naturalist 140: 1000-1009.
36. Shipley, W. F. 1978 Native Languages of California. In Californiaedited by R. F. Heizer., pp. 80-90. Handbook of North American Indians, vol 8 (W.C. Sturtevant, ed). Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
37. Simpson, G. G., A. Roe., & R. C. Lewontin., 1960 Quantitative Zoology. New York: Harcourt and Brace.
38. Sugden, R., 1986. The Economics of Rights, Co-operation and Welfare. Oxford: Blackwell.
39. True, D. L., 1970 Investigation of a Late Prehistoric Complex in Cuyamaca Rancho State Park, San Diego County, California. Archaeological Survey Monograph.Department of Anthropology, University of California, Los Angeles.
40. Thomas, D. H., 1981 How To Classify the Projectile Points from Monitor Valley, Nevada. Journal of California and Great Basin Anthropology 3: 7-43.
41. Thomas, D. H., 1986 Contemporary Hunter-gatherer Archaeology in America. American Archaeology: Past and Present (D. J.Meltzer & D. D.Fowler, eds.), pp. 237-276. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press.
42. White, L., 1959 The Evolution of Culture. New York: McGraw-Hill.
43. Weissner, P., 1983 Style and Social Information in Kalahari San Projectile Points. American Antiquity 48: 235-276.
44. Wilde, J. D., 1985 Prehistoric Settlements in the Northern Great Basin: Excavations and Collections Analysis in the Steens Mountain Area, Southeastern Oregon. Unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Anthropology, University of Oregon.