Towards integrating personalized feedback research into clinical practice: Development of the Trier Treatment Navigator (TTN)

Behaviour Research and Therapy

Volumn 120, Issue , 2019, Pages

  Lutz, Wolfgang ^a   Rubel, Julian A ^a   Schwartz, Brian ^a   Schilling, Viola ^a   Deisenhofer, Anne Katharina ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TRIER   (Germany)

Author keywords

Patient focused feedback research; Personalized and precision mental health; Routine outcome monitoring; Treatment navigation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DETERIORATION; EFFECT SIZE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MACHINE LEARNING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; MONITORING; PREDICTION; PROBABILITY; PROBLEM SOLVING; RISK ASSESSMENT; TREATMENT FAILURE; ADJUSTMENT DISORDER; ADOLESCENT; AGED; ANXIETY DISORDER; CLINICAL DECISION MAKING; CLINICAL DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEM; MENTAL DISEASE; MIDDLE AGED; MOOD DISORDER; PATIENT DROPOUT; PERSONALITY DISORDER; PERSONALIZED MEDICINE; POSTTRAUMATIC STRESS DISORDER; PROCEDURES; QUESTIONNAIRE; YOUNG ADULT;

ADJUSTMENT DISORDERS; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANXIETY DISORDERS; CLINICAL DECISION-MAKING; COGNITIVE BEHAVIORAL THERAPY; DECISION SUPPORT SYSTEMS, CLINICAL; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; HUMANS; MACHINE LEARNING; MALE; MENTAL DISORDERS; MIDDLE AGED; MOOD DISORDERS; PATIENT DROPOUTS; PERSONALITY DISORDERS; PRECISION MEDICINE; PROBLEM SOLVING; STRESS DISORDERS, POST-TRAUMATIC; SURVEYS AND QUESTIONNAIRES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 85068529108     PISSN: 00057967     EISSN: 1873622X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103438     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Baldwin, S.A., Berkeljon, A., Atkins, D.C., Olsen, J.A., Nielsen, S.L., Rates of change in naturalistic psychotherapy: Contrasting dose–effect and good-enough level models of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 77:2 (2009), 203–211.
2. Bar-Kalifa, E., Atzil-Slonim, D., Rafaeli, E., Peri, T., Rubel, J., Lutz, W., Therapist–client agreement in assessments of clients' functioning. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 84(12), 2016 https://doi.org/10.1037/ccp0000157.
3. Beam, A.L., Kohane, I.S., Big data and machine learning in health care. Journal of the American Medical Association 319:13 (2018), 1317–1318.
4. Böhnke, J.R., Lutz, W., Short versions of existing instruments: Using item information to optimize targeted assessments. Assessment 21:6 (2014), 679–693, 10.1177/1073191114529152.
5. Bronisch, T., Hiller, W., Mombour, W., Zaudig, M., International diagnostic checklists for personality disorders according to ICD-10 and DSM–IV-IDCL-P. 1996, Hogrefe and Huber Publishers, Seattle, WA.
6. th ed., 2013, Wiley, Hoboken, N.J., 85–133.
7. Cohen, Z.D., DeRubeis, R.J., Treatment selection in depression. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology 14 (2018), 209–236 https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050817-084746.
8. Coyne, J.C., Kessler, R.C., Tal, M., Turnbull, J., Wortman, C.B., Greden, J.F., Living with a depressed person. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 55:3 (1987), 347–352.
9. Cuijpers, P., Ebert, D.D., Acarturk, C., Andersson, G., Cristea, I.A., Personalized psychotherapy for adult depression: A meta-analytic review. Behavior Therapy 47:6 (2016), 966–980.
10. Deisenhofer, A.K., Delgadillo, J., Rubel, J.A., Böhnke, J.R., Zimmermann, D., Schwartz, B., et al. Individual treatment selection for patients with posttraumatic stress disorder. Depression and Anxiety 35:6 (2018), 541–550.
11. Delgadillo, J., de Jong, K., Lucock, M., Lutz, W., Rubel, J., Gilbody, S., O'Hayon, H., Feedback-informed treatment versus usual psychological treatment for depression and anxiety: A multisite, open-label, cluster randomised controlled trial. The Lancet Psychiatry 5:7 (2018), 564–572.
12. Delgadillo, J., Huey, D., Bennett, H., McMillan, D., Case complexity as a guide for psychological treatment selection. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 85:9 (2017), 835–853.
13. Derogatis, L.R., SCL-90-R: Administration, scoring and procedures manual I. 1977, Clinical psychometric research, Baltimore.
14. DeRubeis, R.J., Cohen, Z.D., Forand, N.R., Fournier, J.C., Gelfand, L.A., Lorenzo-Luaces, L., The personalized advantage index: Translating research on prediction into individualized treatment recommendations. a demonstration. PLoS One, 9(1), 2014, e83875.
15. Ellsworth, J.R., Lambert, M.J., Johnson, J., A comparison of the Outcome Questionnaire‐45and Outcome Questionnaire‐30 in classification and prediction of treatment outcome. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy: An International Journal Of Theory & Practice 13:6 (2006), 380–391.
16. Finch, A.E., Lambert, M.J., Schaalje, B.G., Psychotherapy quality control: The statistical generation of expected recovery curves for integration into an early warning system. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy: An International Journal Of Theory & Practice 8:4 (2001), 231–242.
17. First, M.B., Spitzer, R.L., Gibbon, M., Williams, J.B.W., Structured clinical interview for axis I DSM–IV disorders-patient ed. (SCID-I/P), 1995, Biometrics research department, NY State psychiatric institute, New York, NY.
18. Fisher, A.J., Boswell, J.F., Enhancing the personalization of psychotherapy with dynamic assessment and modeling. Assessment 23:4 (2016), 496–506.
19. Fisher, A.J., Reeves, J.W., Lawyer, G., Medaglia, J.D., Rubel, J.A., Exploring the idiographic dynamics of mood and anxiety via network analysis. Journal of Abnormal Psychology 126:8 (2017), 1044–1056.
20. Franke, G., BSI: Brief Symptom Inventory von L.R. Derogatis (Kurzform der SCL-90-R) – deutsche Version. 2000, Beltz Test GmbH.
21. Furukawa, T.A., Efthimiou, O., Weitz, E.S., Cipriani, A., Keller, M.B., Kocsis, J.H., Schramm, E., Cognitive-behavioral analysis system of psychotherapy, drug, or their combination for persistent depressive disorder: Personalizing the treatment choice using individual participant data network metaregression. Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 87:3 (2018), 140–153.
22. Graser, J., Bohn, C., Kelava, A., Schreiber, F., Hofmann, S.G., Stangier, u., Der „Affective Style Questionnaire (ASQ)”: Deutsche Adaption und Validitäten. Diagnostica 58:2 (2012), 100–111 https://doi.org/10.1026/0012-1924/a000056.
23. Guo, P., Hao, Y., SparseLearner: Sparse learning algorithms using a LASSO-type penalty for coefficient estimation and model prediction. R package version 1.0-2. 2015 http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=SparseLearner.
24. Guo, P., Zeng, F., Hu, X., Zhang, D., Zhu, S., Deng, Y., et al. Improved variable selection algorithm using a LASSO-type penalty, with an application to assessing hepatitis B infection relevant factors in community residents. PLoS One, 10(7), 2015, e0134151, 10.1371/journal.pone.0134151.
25. Hannan, C., Lambert, M.J., Harmon, C., Nielsen, S.L., Smart, D.W., Shimokawa, K., et al. A lab test and algorithms for identifying clients at risk for treatment failure. Journal of Clinical Psychology 61:2 (2005), 155–163.
26. Hayes, S.C., Hofmann, S.G., (eds.) Process-based CBT: The science and core clinical competencies of cognitive behavioral therapy, 2018, New Harbinger Publications.
27. Hofmann, S.G., Kashdan, T.B., The affective style Questionnaire: Development and psychometric properties. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment 32:2 (2010), 255–263 https://doi.org/10.1007/s10862-009-9142-4.
28. Hooke, G.R., Sng, A.A., Cunningham, N.K., Page, A.C., Methods of delivering progress feedback to optimise patient outcomes: The value of expected treatment trajectories. Cognitive Therapy and Research 42:2 (2017), 204–211, 10.1007/s10608-017-9851-z.
29. Howard, K.I., Moras, K., Brill, P.L., Martinovich, Z., Lutz, W., Evaluation of psychotherapy: Efficacy, effectiveness, and patient progress. American Psychologist 51:10 (1996), 1059–1064, 10.1037/0003-066X.51.10.1059.
30. Huibers, M.J.H., Cohen, Z.D., Lemmens, L.H.J.M., Arntz, A., Peeters, F.P.M.L., Cuijpers, P., et al. Predicting optimal outcomes in cognitive therapy or interpersonal psychotherapy for depressed individuals using the personalized advantage index approach. PLoS One, 10(11), 2015, e0140771, 10.1371/journal.pone.0140771.
31. Husen, K., Rafaeli, E., Rubel, J.A., Bar-Kalifa, E., Lutz, W., Daily affect dynamics predict early response in CBT: Feasibility and predictive validity of EMA for outpatient psychotherapy. Journal of Affective Disorders 206 (2016), 305–314.
32. Jacobson, N.S., Truax, P., Clinical significance: A statistical approach to defining meaningful change in psychotherapy research. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 59 (1991), 12–19.
33. Kendrick, T., El-Gohary, M., Stuart, B., Gilbody, S., Churchill, R., Aiken, L., Moore, M., Routine use of patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) for improving treatment of common mental health disorders in adults. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews(7), 2016, 1–103.
34. Kessler, R.C., Van Loo, H.M., Wardenaar, K.J., Bossarte, R.M., Brenner, L.A., Ebert, D.D., et al. Using patient self-reports to study heterogeneity of treatment effects in major depressive disorder. Epidemiology and Psychiatric Sciences 26:1 (2017), 22–36.
35. Kroeze, R., Van Veen, D.C., Servaas, M.N., Bastiaansen, J.A., Oude Voshaar, R., Borsboom, D., et al. Personalized feedback on symptom dynamics of psychopathology: A proof-of-principle study. Journal Of Person-Oriented Research 3:1 (2017), 1–10.
36. Kuhl, J., Kazén, M., Persönlichkeits-Stil-und Störungs-Inventar: (PSSI). [Personality-Style and Disorder Inventory]. Göttingen: Hogrefe. 1997.
37. Lambert, M., Presidential address: What we have learned from a decade of research aimed at improving psychotherapy outcome in routine care. Psychotherapy Research 17:1 (2007), 1–14, 10.1080/10503300601032506.
38. Lambert, M.J., The efficacy and effectiveness of psychotherapy. Lambert, M.J., (eds.) Bergin and Garfield's handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change, 2013, Wiley, New York, NY, 169–218.
39. Lambert, M.J., Bailey, R., Kimball, K., Shimokawa, K., Harmon, S.C., Slade, K., Clinical support tool manual-brief version-40. 2007, OQ Measures, Salt Lake City.
40. Lambert, M.J., Whipple, J.L., Kleinstäuber, M., Collecting and delivering progress feedback. A meta-analysis of routine outcome monitoring. Psychotherapy 55:4 (2018), 520–537.
41. Langkaas, T.F., Wampold, B.E., Hoffart, A., Five types of clinical difference to monitor in practice. Psychotherapy 55:3 (2018), 241–254.
42. Lutz, W., de Jong, K., Rubel, J., Patient-focused and feedback research in psychotherapy: Where are we and where do we want to go?. Psychotherapy Research 25:6 (2015), 625–632, 10.1080/10503307.2015.1079661.
43. Lutz, W., Leach, C., Barkham, M., Lucock, M., Stiles, W.B., Evans, C., Iveson, S., Predicting change for individual psychotherapy clients on the basis of their nearest neighbors. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 73:5 (2005), 904–913.
44. Lutz, W., Saunders, S.M., Leon, S.C., Martinovich, Z., Kosfelder, J., Schulte, D., et al. Empirical and clinical useful decision making in psychotherapy: Differential predictions with treatment response models. Psychological Assessment 18 (2006), 133–144.
45. Lutz, W., Schwartz, B., Hofmann, S.G., Fisher, A.J., Husen, K., Rubel, J.A., Using network analysis for the prediction of treatment dropout in patients with mood and anxiety disorders. A methodological proof-of-concept study. Scientific Reports, 8(1), 2018, 10.1038/s41598-018-25953-0 https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-25953-0.
46. Lutz, W., Tholen, S., Schürch, E., Berking, M., Die Entwicklung, Validität und Reliabilität von Kurzformen gängiger psychometrischer Instrumente zur Evaluation des therapeutischen Fortschrittes in Psychotherapie und Psychiatrie. Diagnostica 52 (2006), 11–25.
47. Lutz, W., Zimmermann, D., Müller, V.N., Deisenhofer, A.K., Rubel, J.A., Randomized controlled trial to evaluate the effects of personalized prediction and adaptation tools on treatment outcome in outpatient psychotherapy: Study protocol. BMC Psychiatry, 17(1), 2017 https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-017-1464-2.
48. Ng, M.Y., Weisz, J.R., Annual research review: Building a science of personalized intervention for youth mental health. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry 57:3 (2016), 216–236.
49. Perlis, R.H., Abandoning personalization to get to precision in the pharmacotherapy of depression. World Psychiatry: Official Journal of the World Psychiatric Association (WPA) 15:3 (2016), 228–235 https://doi.org/10.1002/wps.20345.
50. Probst, T., Lambert, M.J., Dahlbender, R.W., Loew, T.H., Tritt, K., Providing patient progress feedback and clinical support tools to therapists: Is the therapeutic process of patients on-track to recovery enhanced in psychosomatic in-patient therapy under the conditions of routine practice?. Journal of Psychosomatic Research 76:6 (2014), 477–484.
51. R Core Team, R: A language and environment for statistical computing. 2014, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria http://www.R-project.org/.
52. Rubel, J.A., Fisher, A.J., Husen, K., Lutz, W., Translating person-specific network models into personalized treatments: Development and demonstration of the dynamic assessment treatment algorithm for individual networks (DATA-IN). Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics 87 (2018), 249–251, 10.1159/000487769.
53. Rubel, J., Lutz, W., Kopta, S.M., Köck, K., Minami, T., Zimmermann, D., et al. Defining early positive response to psychotherapy: An empirical comparison between clinically significant change criteria and growth mixture modeling. Psychological Assessment 27:2 (2015), 478–488.
54. Schulte, D., Eifert, G.H., What to do when manuals fail? The dual model of psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology-Science and Practice 9 (2002), 312–328.
55. Shimokawa, K., Lambert, M.J., Smart, D.W., Enhancing treatment outcome of patients at risk of treatment failure. Meta-analytic and mega-analytic review of a psychotherapy quality assurance system. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology 78:3 (2010), 298–311 https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019247.
56. Stekhoven, D.J., missForest: Nonparametric missing value imputation using random forest. R package version 1.4. 2013.
57. Stulz, N., Lutz, W., Kopta, S.M., Minami, T., Saunders, S.M., Dose–effect relationship in routine outpatient psychotherapy: Does treatment duration matter?. Journal of Counseling Psychology 60:4 (2013), 593–600.
58. Vermeersch, D.A., Whipple, J.L., Lambert, M.J., Hawkins, E.J., Burchfield, C.M., Okiishi, J.C., Outcome Questionnaire: Is it sensitive to changes in counseling center clients?. Journal of Counseling Psychology 51:1 (2004), 38–49.
59. Whipple, J.L., Lambert, M.J., Vermeersch, D.A., Smart, D.W., Nielsen, S.L., Hawkins, E.J., Improving the effects of psychotherapy. The use of early identification of treatment and problem-solving strategies in routine practice. Journal of Counseling Psychology 50:1 (2003), 59–68 https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0167.50.1.59.
60. White, M.M., Lambert, M.J., Ogles, B.M., Mclaughlin, S.B., Bailey, R.J., Tingey, K.M., Using the Assessment for Signal Clients as a feedback tool for reducing treatment failure. Psychotherapy Research 25:6 (2015), 724–734 https://doi.org/10.1080/10503307.2015.1009862.
61. Wickham, H., ggplot2: Elegant graphics for data analysis. 2016, Springer, New York.
62. Zimmermann, D., Rubel, J., Page, A.C., Lutz, W., Therapist effects on and predictors of non‐consensual dropout in psychotherapy. Clinical Psychology & Psychotherapy 24:2 (2017), 312–321.