메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 19, Issue 1, 2019, Pages

Single screening versus conventional double screening for study selection in systematic reviews: A methodological systematic review

Author keywords

Methodology; Study selection; Systematic reviews

Indexed keywords

DOCUMENTATION; HUMAN; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SYSTEM; MEDLINE; PROCEDURES; PUBLICATION;

EID: 85068127076     PISSN: None     EISSN: 14712288     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s12874-019-0782-0     Document Type: Article
Times cited : (266)

References (18)
  • 1
    • 84937924687 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: A systematic review of current approaches
    • 25588314 4320539
    • O'Mara-Eves A, Thomas J, McNaught J, Miwa M, Ananiadou S. Using text mining for study identification in systematic reviews: a systematic review of current approaches. Syst Rev. 2015;4(1):5.
    • (2015) Syst Rev. , vol.4 , Issue.1 , pp. 5
    • O'Mara-Eves, A.1    Thomas, J.2    McNaught, J.3    Miwa, M.4    Ananiadou, S.5
  • 2
    • 85017375062 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Can abstract screening workload be reduced using text mining? User experiences of the tool Rayyan
    • Olofsson H, Brolund A, Hellberg C, Silverstein R, Stenström K, Österberg M, et al. Can abstract screening workload be reduced using text mining? User experiences of the tool Rayyan. Res Syn Meth. 2017;8(3):275-80.
    • (2017) Res Syn Meth , vol.8 , Issue.3 , pp. 275-280
    • Olofsson, H.1    Brolund, A.2    Hellberg, C.3    Silverstein, R.4    Stenström, K.5    Österberg, M.6
  • 3
    • 85068163016 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen Accessed 06.06.2018
    • Institut für Qualität und Wirtschaftlichkeit im Gesundheitswesen. General methods: version 5.0. 2018; https://www.iqwig.de/download/General-Methods-Version-5-0.pdf. Accessed 06.06.2018.
    • (2018) General Methods: Version 5.0
  • 4
    • 0037098151 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: Accuracy and reliability of screening records
    • 12111924
    • Edwards P, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, Roberts I, Wentz R. Identification of randomized controlled trials in systematic reviews: accuracy and reliability of screening records. Stat Med. 2002;21(11):1635-40.
    • (2002) Stat Med , vol.21 , Issue.11 , pp. 1635-1640
    • Edwards, P.1    Clarke, M.2    Diguiseppi, C.3    Pratap, S.4    Roberts, I.5    Wentz, R.6
  • 6
    • 84992598338 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Cochrane rapid reviews methods group to play a leading role in guiding the production of informed high-quality, timely research evidence syntheses
    • 27793186 5084365
    • Garritty C, Stevens A, Gartlehner G, King V, Kamel C. Cochrane rapid reviews methods group to play a leading role in guiding the production of informed high-quality, timely research evidence syntheses. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):184.
    • (2016) Syst Rev. , vol.5 , Issue.1 , pp. 184
    • Garritty, C.1    Stevens, A.2    Gartlehner, G.3    King, V.4    Kamel, C.5
  • 7
    • 84999040411 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: A rapid review
    • 27884208 5123411
    • Haby MM, Chapman E, Clark R, Barreto J, Reveiz L, Lavis JN. What are the best methodologies for rapid reviews of the research evidence for evidence-informed decision making in health policy and practice: a rapid review. Health Res Policy Syst. 2016;14(1):83.
    • (2016) Health Res Policy Syst , vol.14 , Issue.1 , pp. 83
    • Haby, M.M.1    Chapman, E.2    Clark, R.3    Barreto, J.4    Reveiz, L.5    Lavis, J.N.6
  • 9
    • 85038119480 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • The use of rapid review methods for the U.S. Preventive services task force
    • 29254522
    • Patnode CD, Eder ML, Walsh ES, Viswanathan M, Lin JS. The use of rapid review methods for the U.S. preventive services task force. Am J Prev Med. 2018;54(1 Suppl 1):S19-25.
    • (2018) Am J Prev Med , vol.54 , Issue.1 , pp. S19-S25
    • Patnode, C.D.1    Eder, M.L.2    Walsh, E.S.3    Viswanathan, M.4    Lin, J.S.5
  • 10
    • 84982175121 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the efficiency of study identification methods in systematic reviews
    • 27535658 4989498
    • Shemilt I, Khan N, Park S, Thomas J. Use of cost-effectiveness analysis to compare the efficiency of study identification methods in systematic reviews. Syst Rev. 2016;5(1):140.
    • (2016) Syst Rev. , vol.5 , Issue.1 , pp. 140
    • Shemilt, I.1    Khan, N.2    Park, S.3    Thomas, J.4
  • 11
    • 84992075915 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Implications of applying methodological shortcuts to expedite systematic reviews: Three case studies using systematic reviews from Agri-food public health
    • Pham MT, Waddell L, Rajic A, Sargeant JM, Papadopoulos A, McEwen SA. Implications of applying methodological shortcuts to expedite systematic reviews: three case studies using systematic reviews from Agri-food public health. Res Syn Meth. 2016;7(4):433-46.
    • (2016) Res Syn Meth. , vol.7 , Issue.4 , pp. 433-446
    • Pham, M.T.1    Waddell, L.2    Rajic, A.3    Sargeant, J.M.4    Papadopoulos, A.5    McEwen, S.A.6
  • 13
    • 17444421590 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Identifying studies for systematic reviews of diagnostic tests was difficult due to the poor sensitivity and precision of methodologic filters and the lack of information in the abstract
    • 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M3htFKluw%3D%3D 15845330
    • Doust JA, Pietrzak E, Sanders S, Glasziou PP. Identifying studies for systematic reviews of diagnostic tests was difficult due to the poor sensitivity and precision of methodologic filters and the lack of information in the abstract. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58(5):444-9.
    • (2005) J Clin Epidemiol , vol.58 , Issue.5 , pp. 444-449
    • Doust, J.A.1    Pietrzak, E.2    Sanders, S.3    Glasziou, P.P.4
  • 14
    • 80052151317 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A systematic review/meta-analysis of primary research investigating swine, pork or pork products as a source of zoonotic hepatitis e virus
    • 1:STN:280:DC%2BC3Mnks1yhsA%3D%3D 21554782
    • Wilhelm BJ, Rajic A, Greig J, Waddell L, Trottier G, Houde A, et al. A systematic review/meta-analysis of primary research investigating swine, pork or pork products as a source of zoonotic hepatitis E virus. Epidemiol Infect. 2011;139(8):1127-44.
    • (2011) Epidemiol Infect , vol.139 , Issue.8 , pp. 1127-1144
    • Wilhelm, B.J.1    Rajic, A.2    Greig, J.3    Waddell, L.4    Trottier, G.5    Houde, A.6
  • 15
    • 85035240891 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: A methodological review
    • 29179685 5704562
    • Mathes T, Klassen P, Pieper D. Frequency of data extraction errors and methods to increase data extraction quality: a methodological review. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017;17(1):152.
    • (2017) BMC Med Res Methodol , vol.17 , Issue.1 , pp. 152
    • Mathes, T.1    Klassen, P.2    Pieper, D.3
  • 17
    • 84925768154 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Information on new drugs at market entry: Retrospective analysis of health technology assessment reports versus regulatory reports, journal publications, and registry reports
    • 25722024 4353284
    • Köhler M, Haag S, Biester K, Brockhaus AC, McGauran N, Grouven U, et al. Information on new drugs at market entry: retrospective analysis of health technology assessment reports versus regulatory reports, journal publications, and registry reports. BMJ. 2015;350:h796.
    • (2015) BMJ. , vol.350 , pp. h796
    • Köhler, M.1    Haag, S.2    Biester, K.3    Brockhaus, A.C.4    McGauran, N.5    Grouven, U.6
  • 18
    • 85055071126 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Effective study selection using text mining or a single-screening approach: A study protocol
    • 30340633 6195713
    • Waffenschmidt S, Hausner E, Sieben W, Jaschinski T, Knelangen M, Overesch I. Effective study selection using text mining or a single-screening approach: a study protocol. Syst Rev. 2018;7(1):166.
    • (2018) Syst Rev , vol.7 , Issue.1 , pp. 166
    • Waffenschmidt, S.1    Hausner, E.2    Sieben, W.3    Jaschinski, T.4    Knelangen, M.5    Overesch, I.6


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.