L’approccio psicolessicale nella lingua italiana: due studi tassonomici a confronto

Giornale Italiano di Psicologia

Volumn 29, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 67-93

  Di Blas, Lisa ^a   Perugini, Marco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ESSEX   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85067825177     PISSN: 03905349     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1421/1219     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. ALLPORT G.W., ODBERT H.S. (1936). Trait-names: A psycho-lexical study. Psychological Monographs, 41, 211.
2. ANGLEITNER A., OSTENDORF F., JOHN O.P. (1990). Toward a taxonomy of personality descriptors in German: A psycho-lexical study. European Journal of Personality, 4, 89-118.
3. BENET-MARTÍNEZ V., WALLER N.G. (1997). Further evidence for the cross-cultural generality of the Big Seven factor model: Indigenous and imported Spanish personality constructs. Journal of Personality, 65, 567-598.
4. BERRY J.W. (1969). On cross-cultural comparability. International Journal of Psychology, 4, 119-128.
5. BROKKEN F.B. (1978). The language of personality. Krips: Meppel.
6. CAPRARA G.V., PERUGINI M. (1991). L’approccio psicolessicale e l’emergenza dei Big Five nello studio della personalità. Giornale Italiano di Psicologia, 18, 721-747.
7. CAPRARA G.V., PERUGINI M. (1994). Personality described by adjectives: Ge-neralizability of the Big Five to the Italian lexical context. European Journal of Personality, 8, 357-369.
8. CATTELL R.B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476-507.
9. CATTELL R.B. (1966). The scree test for the number of factors. Multivariate and Behavioural Research, 1, 245-276.
10. CHURCH T.A., KATIGBAK M.S., REYES J.A.S. (1998). Further exploration of Filipino personality structure using the lexical approach: Do the Big Five or Big Seven dimensions emerge? European Journal of Personality, 12, 249-269.
11. COSTA P.T. JR., MCCRAE R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
12. DE RAAD B. (1992). The replicability of the Big Five personality dimensions in three word-classes of the Dutch language. European Journal of Personality, 6, 15-29.
13. DE RAAD B., DI BLAS L., PERUGINI M. (1998). Two independently constructed Italian trait taxonomies: Comparisons among Italian and between Italian and Germanic languages. European Journal of Personality, 12, 19-41.
14. DE RAAD B., HENDRIKS J., HOFSTEE W.K.B. (1994). The Big Five: A tip of the iceberg of individual differences. In The developing structure of temperament and personality from infancy to adulthood, eds. C.F. Halverson, G.A. Kohnstamm, R.P. Martin (Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum), pp. 69-90.
15. DE RAAD B., PERUGINI M., HREBÍCKOVÁ M., SZAROTA P. (1998). Lingua fran-ca of personality: Taxonomies and structures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 29, 212-232.
16. DE RAAD B., PERUGINI M., SZIRMÁK Z. (1997). In pursuit of a cross-lingual reference structure of personality traits: Comparisons between five languages. European Journal of Personality, 11, 164-185.
17. DE RAAD B., VAN HECK G.L. (eds.) (1994). The Fifth of the Big Five. Numero speciale di European Journal of Personality, 8, n. 4.
18. DI BLAS L., FORZI M. (1998). An alternative taxonomic study of personality descriptors in the Italian language. European Journal of Personality, 12, 75-101.
19. DI BLAS L., FORZI M. (1999). Refining a descriptive structure of personality attributes in the Italian language: The abridged Big Three circumplex structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 451-481.
20. DI BLAS L., FORZI M., PEABODY D. (2000). Evaluative and descriptive dimensions from Italian personality factors. European Journal of Personality, 14, 279-290.
21. DIGMAN J.M. (1990). Personality structure: Emergence of the five-factor model. Annual Review of Psychology, 41, 417-440.
22. EVERETT J.E. (1983). Factor comparability as a means of determining the number of factors and their rotation. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 18, 197-218.
23. GALLUCCI M., PERUGINI M. (2000). A new method of selection of marker variables in factor analysis. Manoscritto inviato per la pubblicazione.
24. GOLDBERG L.R. (1981). Language and individual differences: The search for universals in personality lexicons. In Review of personality and social psychology, vol. 2, ed. F. Wheeler (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage), pp. 141-165.
25. GOLDBERG L.R. (1989). Standards markers of the Big Five factor structure. Paper presentato al Workshop su «Personality Language», Università di Groningen, Olanda, giugno 1989.
26. GOLDBERG L.R. (1990). An alternative «description of personality»: the Big Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1216-1229.
27. GOLDBERG L.R. (1992). The development of markers for the Big Five factor structure. Psychological Assessment, 4, 26-42.
28. GOLDBERG L.R. (1993). The structure of phenotypic personality traits. American Psychologist, 48, 26-34.
29. GURTMAN M.B. (1994). The circumplex as a tool for studying normal and abnormal personality: A methodological primer. In Differentiating normal and abnormal personality, eds. S. Strack, M. Lorr (New York: Springer), pp. 243-263.
30. GUTTMAN L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The radex. In Mathematical thinking in the social science, ed. P.F. Lazarsfeld (Glencoe, IL: Free Press), pp. 258-348.
31. HAHN D.W., LEE K., ASHTON M.C. (1999). A factor analysis of the most frequently used Korean personality trait adjectives. European Journal of Personality, 13, 261-282.
32. HAVEN S., TEN BERGE J.M.F. (1977). Tucker’s coefficient of congruence as a measure of factorial invariance: empirical study. Manoscritto non pubblicato. Università di Groningen, Olanda.
33. HOFSTEE W.K.B., DE RAAD B., GOLDBERG L.R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structures. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63, 146-163.
34. HOFSTEE W.K.B., KIERS H.A.L., DE RAAD B., GOLDBERG L.R., OSTENDORF. F. (1997). Comparison of the Big-Five structures of personality traits in Dutch, English, and German. European Journal of Personality, 11, 15-31.
35. HREBÍCKOVÁ M., OSTENDORF F., ANGLEITNER A. (1995). Basic dimensions of personality description in the Czech language. Poster presentato al 7th Meeting of the International Society for Study of Individual Differences, Varsavia, Polonia.
36. ISAKA H. (1990). Factor analysis of trait-terms in everyday Japanese language. Personality and Individual Differences, 11, 115-124.
37. JOHN O.P. (1990). The «Big Five» factor taxonomy: Dimensions of personality in the natural language and in questionnaires. In Handbook of personality. Theory and research, ed. L.A. Pervin (New York: Guilford).
38. JOHN O.P., ANGLEITNER A., OSTENDORF F. (1988). The lexichal approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research. European Journal of Personality, 2, 171-203.
39. JOHNSON J.A., OSTENDORF F. (1993). Clarification of the five factor model with the abridged Big Five dimensional circumplex. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65, 563-576.
40. KAISER H.F. (1974). An index of factorial semplicity. Psychometrika, 39, 31-35.
41. KIERS H.A.L. (1990). SCA: A program for simultaneous components analysis of variables measured in two or more populations. Groningen, Olanda: Iec ProGAMMA.
42. KLINE P. (1996). Manuale di psicometria. Roma: Astrolabio.
43. MCCRAE R.R., YIK M.S.M., TRAPNELL P.D., BOND M.H., PAULHUS D.L. (1998). Interpreting personality profiles across cultures: Bilingual, acculturation, and peer-rating studies of Chinese undergraduates. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1041-1055.
44. NORMAN W.T. (1963). Toward an adequate taxonomy of personality attributes: Replicated factor structure in peer nomination personality ratings. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66, 574-583.
45. OSTENDORF F. (1990). Sprache und Persönlichkeitsstruktur: Zur Validität des Fünf-Faktoren-Modells der Persönlichkeit. Regensburg: Roderer.
46. OSTENDORF F., ANGLEITNER A. (1994). Reflections on different labels for factor V. European Journal of Personality, 8, 341-349.
47. PEABODY D., GOLDBERG L.R. (1989). Some determinants of factor structures from personality trait-descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 552-567.
48. PERUGINI M., GALLUCCI M., LIVI S. (2000). Looking for a simple Big Five factorial structure in the domain of adjectives. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 16, 87-97.
49. PERUGINI M., LAURIOLA M., ERCOLANI A.P. (1995). Modello circomplesso ed analisi fattoriale: un approccio alternativo per lo studio e la rappresentazione di fenomeni psicologici. Testing Psicometria Metodologica, 2, 69-88.
50. PERUGINI M., LEONE L. (1995). Costruzione e validazione di una lista di aggettivi per la misura dei Big Five (LABIF). Rassegna di Psicologia, 12, 103-125.
51. SAUCIER G. (1994). Trapnell versus the lexical factor: More ado about nothing? European Journal of Personality, 8, 291-298.
52. SAUCIER G. (1997). Effects of variable selection on the factor structure of person descriptors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 1296-1312.
53. SAUCIER G., OSTENDORF F., PEABODY D. (1997). The non-evaluative circumplex of personality adjectives. Manoscritto non pubblicato.
54. SHMELYOV A.G., POKHILKO V.I. (1993). A taxonomy-oriented study of Russian personality-trait names. European Journal of Personality, 7, 1-17.
55. SOMER O., GOLDBERG L.R. (1999). The structure of Turkish trait-descriptive adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, 431-450.
56. SZAROTA P., OSTENDORF F. (1997). Taxonomy and structure of Polish personality-relevant adjectives. Manoscritto non pubblicato.
57. SZIRMÁK S., DE RAAD B. (1994). Taxonomy and structure of Hungarian personality traits. European Journal of Personality, 8, 95-117.
58. TRAPNELL P.D. (1994). Openness versus intellect: A lexical left turn. European Journal of Personality, 8, 273-290.
59. TRAPNELL P.D., WIGGINS J.S. (1990). Extension of the interpersonal adjective scales to include the Big Five dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 781-790
60. TUCKER L.J. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies. Personnel Research Section Report N. 984. Washington, D.C.: Department of Army.
61. TUPES E.C., CHRISTAL R.E. (1961). Technical report. Lackland, TX: USAF, Air Force.
62. WIGGINS J.S. (1979). A psychological taxonomy of trait-descriptive terms: The interpersonal domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 395-412.
63. WIGGINS J.S. (ed.) (1996). The Five-Factor model of personality. New York: Guilford.
64. YANG K.S., BOND M.H. (1990). Exploring implicit personality theories with indigenous or imported constructs: The Chinese case. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58, 1087-1095.
65. YIK M.S.M., BOND M.H. (1993). Exploring the dimensions of Chinese person perception with indigenous and imported constructs: Creating a culturally balanced scale. International Journal of Psychology, 28, 75-95.
66. ZUCKERMAN M., KUHLMAN D.M., CAMAC C. (1988). What lies beyond E and N? A factor analysis of scales believed to measure basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 96-107.