A systematic review of automated melanoma detection in dermatoscopic images and its ground truth data

Progress in Biomedical Optics and Imaging - Proceedings of SPIE

Volumn 8318, Issue , 2012, Pages

  Ali, Abder Rahman A ^a   Deserno, Thomas M ^a  

^a RWTH AACHEN UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Algorithms; Computer aided diagnosis; Dermoscopy; Melanoma; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; AUTOMATION; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); DATABASE SYSTEMS; DERMATOLOGY; DISEASES; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; MEDICAL IMAGING; ONCOLOGY;

AUTOMATED MELANOMA DETECTION; COMPREHENSIVE ASSESSMENT; COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS(CAD); DERMOSCOPY; MELANOMA; RECEIVER OPERATOR CHARACTERISTICS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

COMPUTER AIDED DIAGNOSIS;

EID: 85067562624     PISSN: 16057422     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1117/12.912389     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Wolff K, Pehamberger H. Malignes Melanom: Füherkennung und Prognose. Wiener klinische Wochenschrift 1985; 97 (10): 451-5.
2. Han J, Colditz G, Hunter D. Risk Factors For Skin Cancers: A Nested Case-Control Study Within The Nurses' Health Study. Int J Epidemiol 2006; 1514-21.
3. Burg G. Das Melanom. Serie Gesundheit: Piper/VCH. 1993.
4. Schmid-Saugeona P, Guillodb J, Thirana JP. Towards a computer-aided diagnosis system for pigmented skin lesions. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2003; 27 (1): 65-78.
5. Information and Resources for Cancer: Breast, Colon, Prostate, Lung and Other Forms. 2009 [cited 2011 Jul 8]. Available from: http: //www. cancer. org
6. Hintz-Madsen M. A probabilistic frame-work for classification of dermatoscopic images, ph. D. Thesis. IMM 1998.
7. NIH Consensus conference. Diagnosis and treatment of early melanoma. JAMA 1992; 268 (10): 1314-9
8. Argenziano G, Fabbrocini G, Carli P, De Giorgi V, Sammarco E, Delfino M. Epiluminescence microscopy for the diagnosis of doubtful melanocytic skin lesions. Comparison of the ABCD rule of dermoscopy and a new 7-point checklist based on pattern analysis. Arch Dermatol1998; 134 (12): 1563-70.
9. Soyer H, Smolle J, Kerl H, Stettner H. Early diagnosis of malignant melanoma by surface microscopy. Lancet 1987; 2: 803.
10. Kittler H. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions. Gital Dermatol Venereol 2004; 139 (6): 541-6.
11. Stolz W, Riemann A, Cognetta A et al. ABCD rule of dermoscopy: a new practical method for early recognition of malignant melanoma. Eur J Dermatol 1994; 4 (7): 521-7.
12. Johr RH. Dermoscopy: alternative melanocytic algorithms-the ABCD rule of dermoscopy, Menzies scoring method, and 7-point checklist. Clin Dermatol 2002; 20 (3): 240-7.
13. Stolz W, Falco OB, Bliek P, Kandthaler M, Burgdorf WHC, Cognetta AB. Color atlas of dermoscopy, 2nd enlarged and completely revised edition. Berlin: Blackwell publishing; 2002.
14. Argenziano G, Soyer HP, Chimenti S et al. Dermoscopy of pigmented skin lesions: results of a consensus meeting via the Internet. J Am Acad Derm 2003; 48 (5): 679-93.
15. Abbas Q, Celebi ME, Garcia IF. Skin tumor area extraction using an improved dynamic programming approach. Skin Res Technol 2011.
16. Burroni M, Corona R, Dell'Eva G et al. Melanoma computer-aided diagnosis: reliability and feasibility study. Clin Cancer Res 2004; 10 (6): 1881-6.
17. Boldrick JC, Layton CJ, Nguyen J, Swetter SM. Evaluation of digital dermoscopy in a pigmented lesion clinic: clinician versus computer assessment of malignancy risk. J Am Acad Derm 2007; 56 (3): 417-21.
18. Rajpara SM, Botello AP, Townend J, Ormerod AD. Systematic review of dermoscopy and digital dermoscopy/ artificial intelligence for the diagnosis of melanoma. Br J Dermatol 2009; 161 (3): 591-604.
19. Devillé WL, Buntinx F, Bouter LM et al. Conducting systematic reviews of diagnostic studies: didactic guidelines. BMC Med Res Methodol 2002; 2: 9.
20. Šimundi A. Measures of diagnostic accuracy: basic definitions. Med Biol Sci 2008; 22 (4): 61-5.
21. Fawcett T. An introduction to ROC analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters 2006; 27: 861-74.
22. Walter SD. Properties of the summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curve for diagnostic test data. Statistics Med 2002; 21 (9): 1237-56.
23. Glas AS, Lijmer JG, Prins MH, Bonsel GJ, Bossuyt PM. The diagnostic odds ratio: a single indicator of test performance. J Clin Epidemiol 2003; 56 (11): 1129-35.
24. Eadie LH, Taylor P, Gibson AP. A systematic review of computer-assisted diagnosis in diagnostic cancer imaging. Eur J Radiol 2011.
25. McGee S. Simplifying likelihood ratios. J Gen Intern Med 2002; 17 (8): 646-9.
26. Ao S, Gelman L. Lecture notes in electrical engineering 90: electrical engineering and applied computing. Springer Science+Business Media B. V.; 2011.
27. Iyatomi H, Norton KA, Celebi M et al. Classification of melanocytic skin lesions from non-melanocytic lesions. Proc IEEE Engineer Med Biol 2010; 5407-10.
28. Iyatomi H, Oka H, Celebi M et al. An improved Internet-based melanoma screening system with dermatologist-like tumor area extraction algorithm. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2008; 32 (7): 566-79.
29. Iyatomi H, Oka H, Celebi ME et al. Computer-based classification of dermoscopy images of melanocytic lesions on acral volar skin. J Invest Dermatol 2008; 128 (8): 2049-54.
30. Iyatomi H, Oka H, Saito M et al. Quantitative assessment of tumour extraction from dermoscopy images and evaluation of computer-based extraction methods for an automatic melanoma diagnostic system. Melanoma Res 2006; 16 (2): 183-90.
31. Menzies SW, Bischof L, Talbot H et al. The performance of SolarScan: an automated dermoscopy image analysis instrument for the diagnosis of primary melanoma. Arch Dermatol 2005; 141 (11): 1388-96.
32. Stanganelli I, Brucale A, Calori L et al. Computer-aided diagnosis of melanocytic lesions. Anticancer Res 2005; 25 (6C): 4577-82.
33. Blum A, Luedtke H, Ellwanger U et al. Digital image analysis for diagnosis of cutaneous melanoma. Development of a highly effective computer algorithm based on analysis of 837 melanocytic lesions. Br J Dermatol 2004; 151 (5): 1029-38.
34. Piccolo D, Ferrari A, Peris K et al. Dermoscopic diagnosis by a trained clinician vs. A clinician with minimal dermoscopy training vs. computer-aided diagnosis of 341 pigmented skin lesions: a comparative study. Br J Dermatol 2002; 147 (3): 481-6.
35. Argenziano G, Soyer HP, De Giorgi V et al. Dermoscopy: A tutorial. Milan: EDRA Medical Publishing & New Media, 2002.
36. Ganster H, Pinz A, Roehrer R et al. Automated Melanoma Recognition. IEEE transactions on medical imaging 2001; 20: 233-9.
37. Zagrouba E, Barhoumi W. A preliminary approach for the automated recognition for malignant melanoma. Image Anal Stereol 2004; 23 (2), 121-35
38. Zagrouba E, Barhoumi W. An accelerated system for melanoma diagnosis based on subset feature selection. J Comput Inf Technol 2005; 13 (1): 69-82.
39. Fischer B, Palm C, Lehmann T. M., Spitzer K. Selektion von Farbtexturmerkmalen zur Tumorklassifikation dermatoskopischer Fotografien. Proc. Bildverarbeitung für die Medizin 2002; 338-41 [in German].
40. Athanasiou T, Debas H & Darzi A Key topics in surgical research and methodology. Berlin: Springer; 2010.
41. Ras Y & Tsay L Advances in intelligent information systems, Berlin: Springer; 2010.
42. Whitehead A. Meta-analysis of controlled clinical trials. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2002.
43. Glasziou P, Del Mar C & Salisbury J Evidence-based practice workbook. 2nd ed. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2007.
44. Gavaghan DJ, Moore RA, McQuay HJ. An evaluation of homogeneity tests in meta-analyses in pain using simulations of individual patient data. Pain 2000; 85 (3): 415-24.
45. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ (Clinical research ed.) 2003; 327 (7414): 557-60.
46. Oliveira JEE, Güld MO, de A. Araújo A, Ott B, Deserno TD. Towards a standard reference database for computeraided mammography. Procs SPIE 2008; 6915: 1Y1-1Y9.
47. Fischer B, Brosig A, Welter P, Grouls C, Günther RW, Deserno TM. Content-based image retrieval applied to bone age assessment. Procs SPIE 2010; 7624: 121-10.