Historical Institutionalism

The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages

  Sanders, Elizabeth ^a  

^a Department of Government Cornell University ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

Analysis; Historical institutionalism; Institutional change; Institutional development; Institutional maintenance; Quantitative cross sectional analysis; Rational choice

Indexed keywords

EID: 85066678708     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199548460.003.0003     Document Type: Chapter

References (61)

1. BEER, S. H. 1982. Modern British Politics, 3rd edn. New York: W. W. Norton.
2. BENSEL, R. F. 1991. Yankee Leviathan: The Origins of Central State Authority in America, 1859-1877. New York: Cambridge University Press.
3. BENSEL, R. F., 2000. The Political Economy of American Industrialization. New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. BENSEL, R. F., 2004. The American Ballot Box in the Mid-Nineteenth Century. New York: Cambridge University Press.
5. BINDER, S. 1997. Minority Rights, Majority Rule: Partisanship and the Development of Congress. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. BRINKLEY, A. 1982. Voices of Protest. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
7. BROZ, J. L. 1997. The International Origins of the Federal Reserve System. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
8. CARPENTER, D. 2001. The Forging of Bureaucratic Autonomy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
9. CLEMENS, E. 1997. The People's Lobby: Organizational Innovation and the Rise of Interest Group Politics in the United States, 1890-1925. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
10. DUVERGER, M. 1954. Political Parties: Their Organization and Activity in the Modern State. New York: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
11. EISNER, M. A. 1991. Antitrust and the Triumph of Economics. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
12. FORBATH, W. E. 1991. Law and the Shaping of the American Labor Movement. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
13. FRIEDMAN, G. 1999. State-Making and Labor Movements: France and the United States, 1876-1914. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
14. FRYMER, P. 2003. Acting when elected officials won't: federal courts and civil rights enforcement in U. S. labor unions, 1935-1985. American Political Science Review, 97 (3): 483-99.
15. GATES, J. B., (1992). The Supreme Court and Partisan Realignment. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
16. GERRING, J. 2001. Party Ideologies in America, 1828-1926. New York: Cambridge University Press.
17. GOLDFIELD, M. 1989. Worker insurgency, radical organization, and New Deal labor organization. American Political Science Review, 83 (4): 1257-82.
18. GOODWIN, L. 1976. Democratic Promise: The Populist Movement in America. New York: Oxford University Press.
19. HACKER, J. 2002. The Divided Welfare State. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. HALL, P., (ed.) 1989. The Political Power of Economic Ideas: Keynesianism Across Nations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
21. HATTAM, V. C. 1993. Labor Visions and State Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
22. HOFSTADTER, R. 1955. The age of reform: from Bryar to F. D. R. New York: Vintage.
23. KATZNELSON, I., and FARHANG, S. 2005. The southern imposition: Congress and labor in the New Deal and Fair Deal. Studies in American Political Development, 19 (1): 1-30.
24. KATZNELSON, I., GEIGER, K., and KRYDER, D. 1993. Limiting liberalism: the southern veto in Congress, 1933-1950. Political Science Quarterly, 108: 283-306.
25. KESH, K. 2004. Constructing Civil Liberties. New York: Cambridge University Press.
26. KRYDER, D. 2001. Race and the American State During World War II. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. LIEBERMAN, R. C. 2001. Shifting the Color Line: Race and the American Welfare State. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
28. LIEBERMAN, R. C., 2002. Ideas, institutions, and political order: explaining political change. American Political Science Review, 96 (4): 697-712.
29. LIVINGSTON, J. 1986. Origins of the Federal Reserve System: Money, Class, and Corporate Capitalism, 1890-1913. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
30. LOCKE, J. 1690. Two Treatises on Government. New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
31. LOWI, T. J. 1969. The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States. New York: W. W. Norton.
32. MCADAM, D. 1982. Political Process and the Development of Black Insurgency, 1930-1970. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
33. MCCLOSKEY, R. G. 1994. The American Supreme Court, 2nd edn. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
34. MCMATH, R. 1975. Populist Vanguard: A History of the Southern Farmers' Alliance. New York: W. W. Norton.
35. METTLER, S. 1998. Divided Citizens: Gender and Federalism in New Deal Public Policy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
36. NORTH, D. C. 1990. Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
37. ORREN, K. 1991. Belated Feudalism. New York: Cambridge University Press.
38. ORREN, K., and SKOWRONEK, S. 2004. The Search for American Political Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. PIERSON, P. 2000. Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94 (2): 251-66.
40. PIERSON, P., 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
41. POLLACK, N. 1987. The Just Polity: Populism, Law, and Human Welfare. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
42. ROBERTSON, D. 2000. Capital, Labor, and the State. New York: Rowman and Littlefield.
43. ROSENBERG, G. N. 1991. The Hollow Hope. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
44. ROSS, D. 1995. The many lives of institutionalism in American social science. Polity, 28 (1): 117-23.
45. SANDERS, E. 1999. Roots of Reform: Farmers, Workers, and the American State, 1877-1917. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
46. SCHICKLER, E. 2001. Disjointed Pluralism: Institutional Innovation and the Development of the U.S. Congress. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
47. SCHWARTZ, M. 1976, 1988. Radical Protest and Social Structure: The Southern Farmers' Alliance and Cotton Tenancy, 1880-1890. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
48. SKOCPOL, T. 1979. States and Social Revolutions: A Comparative Analysis of France, Russia and China. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
49. SKOCPOL, T., 1992. Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States. Boston: Belknap Press.
50. SKOCPOL, T., 2003. Diminished Democracy: From Membership to Management in American Civic Life. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
51. SKOCPOL, T., and FINEGOLD, K. 1990. Explaining New Deal labor policy. American Political Science Review, 84 (4): 1297-304.
52. SKOCPOL, T., and FINEGOLD, K., 1995. State and Party in America's New Deal: Industry and Agriculture in America's New Deal. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press.
53. SKOWRONEK, S. 1982. Building a New American State: The Expansion of National Administrative Capacities, 1877-1920. New York: Cambridge University Press.
54. SKOWRONEK, S., 1997. The Politics Presidents Make: Leadership from John Adams to Bill Clinton. Boston: Belknap Press.
55. TICHENOR, D. 2002. Dividing Lines: The Politics of Immigration Control in America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
56. DE TOCQUEVILLE, A. 1835. Democracy in America. New York: Signet Press.
57. TOMLINS, C. L. 1985. The State and the Unions: Labor Relations, Law, and the Organized Labor Movement in America, 1880-1960. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
58. SKOCPOL, T., MUNSON, Z., KARCH, A., and BAYLISS, C. 2002. Patriotic partnerships: why great wars novrished American civic volunteerism. Pp. 134-80 in Shaped by War and Trade: International Influences on American Political Development, ed. I. Katznelson and M. Shefter. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59. WILSON, W. 1891. Congressional Government: A Study in American Politics. Boston: Houghton.
60. ZEGART, A. 2000. Flawed by Design: The Evolution of the CIA, JCS, and NSC. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
61. ZEGART, A., 2005. September 11 and the adaptation failure of U. S. intelligence agencies. International Security, 29 (4): 78-111.