Why and How Technology Matters

The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2006, Pages

  Bijker, Wiebe E ^a  

^a MAASTRICHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Political studies; Politics; Practical politics; Society; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 85066527082     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199270439.003.0037     Document Type: Chapter

References (101)

1. ABBATE, J. 1999. Inventing the Internet. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
2. AIBAR, E., and BIJKER, W. E. 1997. Constructing a city: the Cerdà Plan for the extension of Barcelona. Science, Technology & Human Values, 22: 3-30.
3. ALDER, K. 1997. Engineering the Revolution: Arms and Enlightenment in France, 1763-1815. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
4. ASSELT, M. B. A. von. 2000. Perspectives on Uncertainty and Risk: The PRIMA Approach to Decision Support. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
5. BAL, R., BIJKER, W. E., and HENDRIKS, R. 2002. Paradox van wetenschappelijk gezag: Over de maatschappelijke invloed van adviezen van de Gezondheidsraad, 1985-2001. Den Haag: Gezondheidsraad.
6. BAL, R., and HALFFMAN, W. (eds.) 1998. The Politics of Chemical Risk: Scenarios for a Regulatory Future. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
7. BARBER, B. R. 1984. Strong Democracy. Berkeley: University of California Press.
8. BECK, U. 1986. Risikogesellschaft: Auf dem Weg in eine andere Moderne. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.
9. BECK, U. 1992. Risk Society. London: Sage.
10. BECK, U. 1993. Die Erfindung des Politischen: Zu einer Theorie reflexiver Modernisierung. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp Verlag.
11. BECK, U. 1997. The Reinvention of Politics. Cambridge: Polity Press.
12. BIJKER, W. E. 1995. Of Bicycles, Bakelites and Bulbs. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
13. BIJKER, W. E. 1997. Demokratisierung der Technik-Wer sind die Experten? Pp. 133-55 in Aufstand der Laien. Expertentum und Demokratie in der technisierten Welt, ed. M. Kerner. Aachen: Thouet Verlag.
14. BIJKER, W. E. 2002. The Oosterschelde Storm Surge Barrier: a test case for Dutch water technology, management and politics. Technology & Culture, 43: 569-84.
15. BIJKER, W. E. and Bijsterveld, K. 2000. Women walking through plans-technology, democracy and gender identity. Technology & Culture, 41: 485-515.
16. BIJKER, W. E. HUGHES, T. P., and PINCH, T. (eds.) 1987. The Social Construction of Technological Systems. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
17. BIJKER, W. E. and LAW, J. (eds.) 1992. Shaping Technology / Building Society. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
18. BIMBER, B. 1996. The Politics of Expertise in Congress: The Rise and Fall of the Office of Technology Assessment. Albany: State University of New York Press.
19. BIMBER, B. 2003. Information and American Democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press.
20. BOWKER, G. C., and STAR, S. L. 1999. Sorting Things Out: Classification and its Consequences. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
21. BRANSCOMB, L. M. (ed.) 1993. Empowering Technology: Implementing a U.S. Strategy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
22. BRANSCOMB, L. M. 2001. Technological innovation. In Smelser and Baltes 2001, 15498-502.
23. COLLINGRIDGE, D. 1980. The Social Control of Technology. London: Frances Pinter.
24. COLLINS, H. M. 1985. Changing Order: Replication and Induction in Scientific Practice. London: Sage.
25. COLLINS, H. M. and EVANS, R. 2002. The third wave of science studies: studies of expertise and experience. Social Studies of Science, 32: 235-96.
26. COLLINS, H. M. and PINCH, T. J. 1998. The Golem: What You Should Know About Science, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
27. COWAN, R. S. 1983. More Work for Mother. New York: Basic Books.
28. DAVID, P. 1985. Clio and the economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75: 332-7.
29. DEWEY, J. 1991. The Public and its Problems. Athens, Oh.: Swallow Press; originally published 1927.
30. DIJK, J. VAN. 2000. Models of democracy and concepts of communication. In Hacker and Dijk 2000, 30-53.
31. DOSI, G., FREEMAN, C., NELSON, R., SILVERBERG, G., and SOETE, L. (eds.) 1988. Technical Change and Economic Theory, 2nd edn. London: Pinter.
32. DUNLAVY, C. A. 1994. Politics and Industrialization: Early Railroads in the United States and Prussia. Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univversity Press.
33. EDEN, L. 2004. Whole World on Fire: Organizations, Knowledge, & Nuclear Weapons Devastation. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
34. EDWARDS, P. N. 1996. The Closed World: Computers and the Politics of Discourse in Cold War America. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
35. ELZINGA, A. 2004. Metaphors, models and reification in science and technology policy discourse. Science as Culture, 13: 105-21.
36. EPSTEIN, S. 1996. Impure Science: AIDS, Activism and the Politics of Knowledge. Berkeley: University of California Press.
37. EUROPEAN ENVIRONMENT AGENCY (EEA) 2001. Late Lessons from Early Warnings: The Precautionary Principle 1896-2000. Copenhagen: EEA.
38. EZRAHI, Y. 1995. Technology and the civil epistemology off democracy. In Feenberg and Hannay 1995, 159-71.
39. FEENBERG, A. 1995. Subversive rationalization, technology, power and democracy. In Feenberg and Hannay 1995, 3-24.
40. FEENBERG, A. 2001. Looking backward, looking forward: reflections on the twentieth century. Hitotsubashi Journal of Social Sciences, 33: 135-42.
41. FEENBERG, A. and HANNAY, A. (eds.) 1995. Technology and the Politics of Knowledge. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
42. FIJNAUT, C., and MARX, G. T. 1995. Undercover. The Hague: Kluwer Law International.
43. FREEMAN, C., and SOETE, L. 1997. The Economics of Industrial Innovation, 3rd edn. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
44. FUNTOWICZ, S., and RAVETZ, J. 1989. Managing the uncertainties of statistical information. Pp. 95-117 in Environmental Threats, ed. J. Brown. London: Belhaven Press.
45. FUNTOWICZ, S., and RAVETZ, J. 2001. Post-normal science: science and governance under conditions of complexity. Pp. 15-24 in Interdisciplinarity in Technology Assessment. Implementation and its Chances and Limits, ed. M. Decker. Berlin: Springer.
46. GERRARD, M. B. 1994. Whose Backyard, Whose Risk: Fear and Fairness in Toxic and Nuclear Waste Siting. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
47. GIERYN, T. F. 1983. Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists. American Sociological Review, 48: 781-95.
48. GIERYN, T. F. 1999. Cultural Boundaries of Science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
49. GOLDING, D. 2001. Precautionary principle. In Smelser and Baltes 2001, 11961-3.
50. GOMART, E., and HAJER, M. A. 2003. Is that politics? For an inquiry into forms in contemporaneous politics. Pp. 33-61 in Social Studies of Science and Technology, ed. B. Joerges and H. Nowotny. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.
51. GOTTWEIS, H. 1998. Governing Molecules: The Discursive Politics of Genetic Engineering in Europe and the United States. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
52. GRAHAM, L. S. 2001. Political modernization: development of the concept. In Smelser and Baltes 2001, 9963-5.
53. GUSTON, D. 2000. Between Politics and Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
54. GUSTON, D. 2001. Boundary organizations in environmental policy and science (Special Issue). Science, Technology & Human Values, 26: 399-500.
55. GUSTON, D. and KENISTON, K. (eds). 1994. The Fragile Contract: University Science and the Federal Government. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
56. HACKER, K. L., and DIJK, J. VAN. (eds.) 2000. Digital Democracy. London: Sage.
57. HAGEN, M. 2000. Digital democracy and political systems. In Hacker and van Dijk 2000, 54-69.
58. HAGUE, B. N., and LOADER, B. 1999. Digital Democracy. London: Routledge.
59. HALFFMAN, W. 2002. Boundaries of Regulatory Science: Eco/toxicology and Aquatic Hazards of Chemicals in the US, England and the Netherlands, 1970-1995. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam.
60. HECHT, G. 1998. The Radiance of France: Nuclear Power and National Identity after World War II. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
61. HELD, D. 1996. Models of Democracy, 2nd edn. Cambridge: Polity Press.
62. HILGARTNER, S. 2000. Science on Stage. Stanford, Calif.: Stanford University Press.
63. HOMMELS, A. M. 2005. Unbuilding Cities. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
64. HUGHES, A. C., and HUGHES, T. P. (eds.) 2000. Systems, Experts and Computers: The Systems Approach in Management and Engineering, World War II and After. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
65. HUGHES, A. C., ALLEN, M. T., and HECHT, G. 2001. Technologies of Power. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
66. HUGHES, T. P. 1983. Networks of Power: Electrification in Western Society, 1880-1930. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press.
67. INGLEHART, R. 2001. Sociological theories of modernization. In Smelser and Baltes 2001, 9965-71.
68. JASANOFF, S. 1990. The Fifth Branch: Science Advisers as Policymakers. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
69. JASANOFF, S. (ed.) 2004. States of Knowledge: The Co-production of Science and Social Order. New York: Routledge.
70. KLINKE, A., and RENN, O. 2002. A new approach to risk evaluation and management: risk-based, precaution-based and discourse-based strategies. Risk Analysis, 22: 1071-94.
71. LYON, D. 2003. Surveillance technology and surveillance society. Pp. 161-83 in Modernity and Technology, ed. T. J.Misa, P. Brey, and A. Feenberg. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
72. MAC KENZIE, D. 1990. Inventing Accuracy. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
73. MAC KENZIE, D. and WAJCMAN, J. (eds.) 1999. The Social Shaping of Technology, 2nd edn. Buckingham: Open University Press.
74. MATHEWS, J. 1989. Age of Democracy: The Politics of Post-Fordism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
75. MAYNTZ, R., and HUGHES, T. (eds.) 1988. The Development of Large Technical Systems. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
76. MIETTINEN, R. 2002. National Innovation System. Helsinki: Edita.
77. NELKIN, D. (ed.) 1979. Controversy: Politics of Technical Decisions. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.
78. NELKIN, D. and BROWN, M. S. 1984. Workers ar Risk. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
79. NELKIN, D. and POLLAK, M. 1979. Public participation in technological decisions: reality or grand illusion? Technology Review, 81: 55-64.
80. NELSON, R. R. (ed.) 1993. National Innovation Systems. New York: Oxford University Press.
81. NOWOTNY, H., SCOTT, P., and GIBBONS, M. 2001. Re-thinking Science: Knowledge and the Public in an Age of Uncertainty. Cambridge: Polity Press.
82. O'RIORDAN, T., and JORDAN, A. 1995. The precautionary principle in contemporary environmental politics. Environmental Values, 14: 191-212.
83. OGBURN, W. F., ADAMS, J., and GILFILLAN, S. C. 1946. The Social Effects of Aviation. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
84. OUDSHOORN, N. 2003. The Male Pill. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
85. PILLER, C. 1991. The Fail-Safe Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.
86. RIP, A., MISA, T. J., and SCHOT, J. (eds.) 1995. Managing Technology in Society. London: Pinter.
87. ROSA, E. A., and FREUDENBURG, W. R. 2001. Sociological study of risk. In Smelser and Baltes 2001, 13356-60.
88. ROSENBERG, N., and BIRDZELL, L. E. 1986. How the West Grew Rich. New York: Basic Books.
89. ROY, A. 1999. The Greater Common Good. Bombay: India Book Distributors.
90. SCLOVE, R. E. 1995. Democracy and Technology. New York: Guilford Press.
91. SMELSER, N., and BALTES, P. B. (eds.) 2001. International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences. Oxford: Elsevier Science.
92. SUMMERTON, J. (ed.) 1994. Changing Large Technical Systems. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press.
93. TSAGAROUSIANOU, R. 1998. Electronic democracy and the public sphere: opportunities and challenges. In Tsagarousianou, Tambini, and Bryan 1998, 167-78.
94. TSAGAROUSIANOU, R., TAMBINI, D., and Bryan, C. 1998. Cyberdemocracy. London: Routledge.
95. United Nations (UN) 1992. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. New York: UN.
96. WAJCMAN, J. 2004. TechnoFeminism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
97. WINNER, L. 1977. Autonomous Technology. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
98. WINNER, L. 1980. Do artifacts have politics? Daedalus, 109: 121-36; reprinted in Winner 1986, 19-39.
99. WINNER, L. 1986. The Whale and the Reactor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
100. WYNNE, B. 1992. Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Global Environmental Change, 2: 111-27.
101. YEARLEY, S. 2001. Sociology and politics of risk. In Smelser and Baltes 2001, 13360-4.