Structural transformation to attain responsible BIOSciences (STARBIOS2): Protocol for a horizon 2020 funded European multicenter project to promote responsible research and innovation

JMIR Research Protocols

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2019, Pages

  Colizzi, Vittorio ^a   Mezzana, Daniele ^a   Ovseiko, Pavel V ^b   Caiati, Giovanni ^c   Colonnello, Claudia ^c   Declich, Andrea ^a   Buchan, Alastair M ^b   Edmunds, Laurel ^b   Buzan, Elena ^d   Zerbini, Luiz ^e   Djilianov, Dimitar ^f   Schmidt, Evanthia Kalpazidou ^g   Bielawski, Krzysztof P ^h   Elster, Doris ⁱ   Salvato, Maria ^j   Alcantara, Luiz C ^k   Minutolo, Antonella ^a   Potestà, Marina ^a   Bachiddu, Elena ^a   Milano, Maria J ^b   Henderson, Lorna R ^l   Kiparoglou, Vasiliki ^l   Friesen, Phoebe ^b   Sheehan, Mark ^b   Moyankova, Daniela ^f   Rusanov, Krasimir ^f   Wium, Martha ^e   Raszczyk, Izabela ^h   Konieczny, Igor ^h   Gwizdala, Jerzy P ^h   Śledzik, Karol ^h   Barendziak, Tanja ⁱ   Birkholz, Julia ⁱ   Müller, Nicklas ⁱ   Warrelmann, Jürgen ⁱ   Meyer, Ute ⁱ   Filser, Juliane ⁱ   Barreto, Fernanda Khouri ^k   Montesano, Carla ^a   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF ROME TOR VERGATA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c Laboratorio di Scienze della Cittadinanza (LSC)   (Italy)

^d UNIVERSITY OF PRIMORSKA   (Slovenia)

^e INTERNATIONAL CENTRE FOR GENETIC ENGINEERING AND BIOTECHNOLOGY   (Italy)

^f AGROBIOINSTITUTE   (Bulgaria)

^g AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^h UNIVERSITY OF GDA SK   (Poland)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF BREMEN   (Germany)

^j UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^k INSTITUTO OSWALDO CRUZ   (Brazil)

^l OXFORD UNIVERSITY HOSPITALS NHS FOUNDATION TRUST   (United Kingdom)

more..

Author keywords

Action plans; Ethics; Gender; Guidelines; Horizon 2020; Institutional change; Model for RRI in biosciences; Open access; Patient involvement; Public engagement; Responsible research and innovation; Science education; Science with and for Society; Structural change

Indexed keywords

ADVISORY COMMITTEE; ARTICLE; BRAZIL; BULGARIA; DENMARK; EDUCATION; ETHICS; GENDER; GERMANY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; IMPLEMENTATION SCIENCE; ITALY; LEARNING; MONITORING; MULTICENTER STUDY; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; POLAND; SLOVENIA; SOUTH AFRICA; SWEDEN; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 85066505160     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19290748     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2196/11745     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. European Commission. Brussels: European Union; 2014. Responsible Research and Innovation: Europe's ability to respond to societal challenges URL: https://ec.europa.eu/research/swafs/pdf/pub-rri/KI0214595ENC.pdf [accessed 2018-11-23] [WebCite Cache ID 748sBtkz5]
2. European Commission. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2013. EUR 25766-Options for Strengthening Responsible Research and Innovation URL: https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document-library/pdf-06/options-for-strengthening-en.pdf [accessed 2018-11-23] [WebCite Cache ID 748sFhLjE]
3. Bijker WE, d'Andrea L. Handbook on the Socialisation of Scientific and Technological Research: A tool for promoting science and technology socialisation policies addressed to policy makers, research and innovation actors and stakeholders. Rome: Social Science and European Research Capacities (SS-ERC) Project; 2009. URL: http://www.scienzecittadinanza.org/Public/SSERChandbook.pdf [accessed 2018-06-22] [WebCite Cache ID 70MkCpXqH]
4. Mezzana D. Scienzecittadinanza. 2011. Technological responsibility: Guidelines for a shared governance of the processes of socialisation of scientific research innovation, within an interconnected world URL: http://www.scienzecittadinanza.org/public/SetDevGuidelines.pdf [accessed 2018-06-22] [WebCite Cache ID 70MoHTxwu]
5. GREAT. 2013. Annual report on the main trends of SiS, in particular the trends related to RRI URL: http://www. great-project.eu/deliverables-files/deliverables05 [accessed 2018-06-22] [WebCite Cache ID 70MoRliXC]
6. Hellström T. Systemic innovation and risk: technology assessment and the challenge of responsible innovation. Technology in Society 2003 Aug;25(3):369-384. [doi: 10.1016/S0160-791X(03)00041-1]
7. Guston DH. Responsible innovation in the commercialised university. In: Stein DG, editor. Buying In or Selling Out?: The Commercialization of the American Research University. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press; 2004:161-174.
8. Owen R, Baxter D, Maynard T, Depledge MH. Beyond Regulation: Risk Pricing and Responsible Innovation. Environ Sci Technol 2009 Sep 15;43(18):6902-6906. [doi: 10.1021/es803332u]
9. von Schomberg R. Towards responsible research and innovation in the information and communication technologies and security technologies fields. In: von Schomberg R, editor. Towards responsible research and innovation in the information and communication technologies and security technologies fields. Luxembourg: European Union; Nov 13, 2011:7-16.
10. Burget M, Bardone E, Pedaste M. Definitions and Conceptual Dimensions of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Literature Review. Sci Eng Ethics 2017 Dec;23(1):1-19. [doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9782-1] [Medline: 27090147]
11. Stahl BC, McBride N, Wakunuma K, Flick C. The empathic care robot: A prototype of responsible research and innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 2014 May;84:74-85. [doi: 10.1016/j.techfore.2013.08.001]
12. European Commission. Brussels Responsible research & innovation URL: https://ec.europa.eu/research/science-society/document-library/pdf-06/options-for-strengthening-en.pdf [accessed 2018-12-04] [WebCite Cache ID 74Pgv2mJ5]
13. Ribeiro BE, Smith RDJ, Millar K. A Mobilising Concept? Unpacking Academic Representations of Responsible Research and Innovation. Sci Eng Ethics 2017 Dec;23(1):81-103. [doi: 10.1007/s11948-016-9761-6] [Medline: 26956121]
14. European Commission. Responsible research & innovation URL: http://ec.europa.eu/programmes/horizon2020/en/h2020-section/responsible-research-innovation [accessed 2018-11-30] [WebCite Cache ID 70MogvEF3]
15. Downs JB, Velamuri V. Business Model Innovation Opportunities for the Biopharmaceutical Industry: A Systematic Review. Journal of Commercial Biotechnology 2016 Dec 28;22(3). [doi: 10.5912/jcb735]
16. Douglas CMW, Stemerding D. Governing synthetic biology for global health through responsible research and innovation. Syst Synth Biol 2013 Sep;7(3):139-150 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1007/s11693-013-9119-1] [Medline: 24432151]
17. Directorate-General for Research and Innovation (European Commission). Structural change in research institutions. Enhancing excellence, gender equality and efficiency in research and innovation. Brussels: Publications Office of the European Union; 2012.
18. Fox MF. Institutional Transformation and the Advancement of Women Faculty: The Case of Academic Science and Engineering. In: Smart JC, editor. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Volume 23. Dordrecht: Springer; 2008:73-103.
19. van den Brink M, Benschop Y. Gender practices in the construction of academic excellence: Sheep with five legs. Organization 2011 Jul 29;19(4):507-524. [doi: 10.1177/1350508411414293]
20. Kalpazidou Schmidt E, Cacace M. Addressing gender inequality in science: the multifaceted challenge of assessing impact. Research Evaluation 2017 Feb 16;26(2):102-114 [FREE Full text]
21. Kalpazidou Schmidt E, Cacace M. Setting up a dynamic framework to activate gender equality structural transformation in research organizations. Science and Public Policy 2018;scy059. [doi: 10.1093/scipol/scy059]
22. Ovseiko PV, Edmunds LD, Pololi LH, Greenhalgh T, Kiparoglou V, Henderson LR, et al. Markers of achievement for assessing and monitoring gender equity in translational research organisations: a rationale and study protocol. BMJ Open 2016 Jan 07;6(1):e009022 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2015-009022] [Medline: 26743702]
23. Ovseiko PV, Greenhalgh T, Adam P, Grant J, Hinrichs-Krapels S, Graham KE, et al. A global call for action to include gender in research impact assessment. Health Res Policy Syst 2016 Jul 19;14(1):50 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/s12961-016-0126-z] [Medline: 27432056]
24. Kuhlmann E, Ovseiko PV, Kurmeyer C, Gutiérrez-Lobos K, Steinböck S, von KM, et al. Closing the gender leadership gap: a multi-centre cross-country comparison of women in management and leadership in academic health centres in the European Union. Hum Resour Health 2017 Dec 06;15(1):2 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/s12960-016-0175-y] [Medline: 28061790]
25. Ovseiko PV, Chapple A, Edmunds LD, Ziebland S. Advancing gender equality through the Athena SWAN Charter for Women in Science: an exploratory study of women's and men's perceptions. Health Res Policy Syst 2017 Feb 21;15(1):12 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0177-9] [Medline: 28222735]
26. Hasebrook J, Hahnenkamp K, Buhre WFFA, de Korte-de Boer D, Hamaekers AEW, Metelmann B, et al. Medicine Goes Female: Protocol for Improving Career Options of Females and Working Conditions for Researching Physicians in Clinical Medical Research by Organizational Transformation and Participatory Design. JMIR Res Protoc 2017 Aug 02;6(8):e152 [FREE Full text] [doi: 10.2196/resprot.7632] [Medline: 28768613]
27. d'Andrea L, Declich A. The sociological nature of science communication. Journal of Science Communication 2005;4(2):1-9 [FREE Full text]
28. Cacace M, d'Andrea L, Declich A. Accompanying Research on Implementation Dynamics: Final Report of the STAGES (Structural Change to Achieve Gender Equality in Science) Project. Rome: ASDO; 2018. URL: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/323227952-Structural-Transformation-to-Achieve-Gender-Equality-in-Science - Final-research-report [accessed 2018-11-30] [WebCite Cache ID 74KGMJtsW]
29. Berger P, Luckmann T. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday; 1966.
30. Archer M. Realist Social Theory: The Morphogenetic Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1995.
31. Giddens A. The Constitution of Society. Outline of the Theory of Structuration. Cambridge: Polity Press; 1984.
32. Kalpazidou Schmidt E. RTD evaluation and policy in the European Research Area. Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice 2006 May 16;2(2):185-209. [doi: 10.1332/174426406777068948]
33. STARBIOS2. 2018. URL: https://starbios2.eu [accessed 2018-09-25] [WebCite Cache ID 72h3k9BOq]
34. STARBIOS2. Project Twitter account. 2018. URL: https://twitter.com/STARBIOS2 [accessed 2018-09-25] [WebCite Cache ID 72h42qBoG]