The NAAEE workshop on developing guidelines for qualitative research in environmental education: An analysis of premises, processes and products

Environmental Education Research

Volumn 6, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 27-35

  Marcinkowsi, Tom ^a  

^a FLORIDA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85066184669     PISSN: 13504622     EISSN: 14695871     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/135046200110467     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ARY, D., JACOBS, L.C., and RAZAVIEH, A., 1996. Introduction to Research in Education, 5th edn, Orlando, FL: Harcourt Brace.
2. DENZIN, N., and LINCOLN, Y., eds. 1998a. Collecting and Interpreting Qualitative Materials, Handbook of Qualitative Research Paperback Edition, Vol. 3, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
3. DENZIN, N., and LINCOLN, Y., eds. 1998b. The Landscape of Qualitative Research, Handbook of Qualitative Research Paperback Edition, Vol. 2, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
4. DENZIN, N., and LINCOLN, Y., eds. 1998c. Strategies of Qualitative Inquiry, Handbook of Qualitative Research Paperback Edition, Vol. 3, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
5. ESTE, D., SIEPPERT, J., and BARSKY, A., 1998. Teaching and learning qualitative research with and without qualitative data analysis software. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 31(2): 138–154.
6. ERICKSON, F., 1986. “ Qualitative methods in research on teaching ”. In Handbook of Research on Teaching, 3rd edn, Edited by: WITTROCK, M.C., 119–161. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally.
7. ERLANDSON, D., HARRIS, E., SKIPPER, B., and ALLEN, S., 1993. Doing Naturalistic Inquiry: A Guide to Methods, Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
8. FRANKEL, J., and WALLEN, N., 1996. How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education, 3rd edn, New York: McGraw-Hill.
9. GALL, M., BORG, W., and GALL, J., 1996. Educational Research: An Introduction, 6th edn, White Plains, NY: Longman.
10. GUBA, E., 1978. Toward a Methodology of Naturalistic Inquiry in Educational Evaluation, CSE Monograph Series in Evaluation No. 8 Los Angeles, CA: Center for the Study of Evaluation, UCLA.
11. GUBA, E., 1981. Criteria for assessing the trustworthiness of naturalistic inquiries (ERIC/ECTJ Annual Review Paper). Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 29(2): 75–91.
12. KERLINGER, F., 1973. Foundations of Behavioral Research, 2nd edn, New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
13. MARCINKOWSKI, T., 1993. “ A contextual review of the 'quantitative paradigm' in EE research ”. In Alternative Paradigms in Environmental Education Research, Edited by: MRAZEK, R., 29–79. Troy, OH: North American Association for Environmental Education.
14. MRAZEK, R., ed. 1993. Alternative Paradigms in Environmental Education Research, Troy, OH: North American Association for Environmental Education.
15. NOVAK, J., and GOWIN, D.B., 1984. Learning How to Learn, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
16. SMITH-SEBASTO, N., 2000. An exploration of potential guidelines for conducting and reporting environmental education research: qualitative methods of inquiry. Environmental Education Research, 6(1): 9–26.