Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all biorxiv preprints

eLife

Volumn 8, Issue , 2019, Pages

  Abdill, Richard J ^a   Blekhman, Ran ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; METADATA; PUBLICATION; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PROCEDURES;

INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; PREPRINTS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85065854735     PISSN: None     EISSN: 2050084X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.45133     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Aksnes DW. When different persons have an identical author name. How frequent are homonyms? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 2008;59:838-841. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.20788.
2. Altmetric Support How is the altmetric attention score calculated? [November 30, 2018];2018 https://help.altmetric.com/support/solutions/articles/6000060969-how-is-the-altmetric-attention-score-calculated
3. Anaya J. 674d5aaPrePubMed: Analyses. 2018 https://github.com/OmnesRes/prepub/tree/master/analyses/preprint_data.txt
4. Barsh GS, Bergman CM, Brown CD, Singh ND, Copenhaver GP. Bringing PLOS Genetics Editors to Preprint Servers. PLOS Genetics. 2016;12:e1006448. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1006448.
5. Berg JM, Bhalla N, Bourne PE, Chalfie M, Drubin DG, Fraser JS, Greider CW, Hendricks M, Jones C, Kiley R, King S, Kirschner MW, Krumholz HM, Lehmann R, Leptin M, Pulverer B, Rosenzweig B, Spiro JE, Stebbins M, Strasser C, Swaminathan S, Turner P, Vale RD, VijayRaghavan K, Wolberger C. Preprints for the life sciences. Science. 2016;352:899-901. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf9133.
6. BioRxiv Submission guide. [November 30, 2018];2018 https://www.biorxiv.org/submit-a-manuscript
7. Callaway E. Preprints come to life. Nature. 2013;503:180. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1038/503180a.
8. Champieux R. Gathering steam: Preprints, librarian outreach, and actions for change. [December 18, 2018];The Official PLOS Blog. 2018 https://blogs.plos.org/plos/2018/10/gathering-steam-preprints-librarian-outreach-and-actions-for-change/
9. Chan Zuckerberg Initiative Science funding. [April 17, 2019];2019 https://chanzuckerberg.com/science/science-funding/
10. Clarivate Analytics . Journal Citation Reports Science Edition. Clarivate Analytics; 2018.
11. Cobb M. The prehistory of biology preprints: A forgotten experiment from the 1960s. PLOS Biology. 2017;15:e2003995. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.2003995.
12. Crossref Crossref metadata delivery REST API. [December 19, 2018];2018 https://www.crossref.org/services/metadata-delivery/rest-api/
13. De Coster W. A Twitter bot to find the most interesting bioRxiv preprints. [December 11, 2018];Gigabase or Gigabyte. 2017 https://gigabaseorgigabyte.wordpress.com/2017/08/08/a-twitter-bot-to-find-the-most-interesting-biorxiv-preprints/
14. Delamothe T, Smith R, Keller MA, Sack J, Witscher B. Netprints: The next phase in the evolution of biomedical publishing. BMJ. 1999;319:1515-1516. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.319.7224.1515.
15. Desjardins-Proulx P, White EP, Adamson JJ, Ram K, Poisot T, Gravel D. The case for open preprints in biology. PLOS Biology. 2013;11:e1001563. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.1001563.
16. Di Gregorio F, Varrazzo D. 2.7.5Psycopg2. 2018 https://github.com/psycopg/psycopg2
17. Docker Inc 18.06.1-ceDocker. 2018 https://www.docker.com
18. Feldman S, Lo K, Ammar W. Citation count analysis for papers with preprints. arXiv. 2018 https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.05238
19. Garfield E. The history and meaning of the journal impact factor. Jama. 2006;295:90-93. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.1.90.
20. Haak L. The O in ORCID. [November 30, 2018];ORCiD. 2012 https://orcid.org/blog/2012/12/06/o-orcid
21. Hartgerink CHJ. Publication cycle: A study of the public library of science (PLOS) [December 4, 2018];2015 https://www.authorea.com/users/2013/articles/36067-publication-cycle-a-study-of-the-public-library-of-science-plos/_show_article
22. Haustein S. Scholarly Twitter metrics. arXiv. 2018 http://arxiv.org/abs/1806.02201
23. Himmelstein D. The history of publishing delays. [December 29, 2018];Satoshi Village. 2016a https://blog.dhimmel.com/history-of-delays/
24. Himmelstein D. The licensing of bioRxiv preprints. [December 29, 2018];Satoshi Village. 2016b https://blog.dhimmel.com/biorxiv-licenses/
25. Holdgraf CR. The bleeding edge of publishing, scraping publication amounts at biorxiv. [November 30, 2018];Predictably Noisy. 2016 https://predictablynoisy.com/scrape-biorxiv
26. Inglis JR, Sever R. bioRxiv: A progress report. [December 5, 2018];ASAPbio. 2016 http://asapbio.org/biorxiv
27. Kaiser J. The preprint dilemma. Science. 2017;357:1344-1349. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1126/science.357.6358.1344.[PubMed]
28. Karpathy A. Arxiv Sanity Preserver, "twitter_daemon.py". 8e52b8b2018 https://github.com/karpathy/arxiv-sanity-preserver/blob/8e52b8ba59bfb5684f19d485d18faf4b7fba64a6/twitter_daemon.py
29. Klein M, Broadwell P, Farb SE, Grappone T. Comparing published scientific journal articles to their pre-print versions. Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries. 2016;162
30. Kling R, Spector LB, Fortuna J. The real stakes of virtual publishing: The transformation of E-Biomed into PubMed Central. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2003;55:127-148.
31. Kramer B. Rxivist analysis. [March 15, 2019];Google Docs. 2019 https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/18-zIlfgrQaGo6e4SmyfzMTY7AN1dUYiI5l6PyX5pWtg/edit#gid=1455314569
32. Larivière V, Sugimoto CR, Macaluso B, Milojević S, Cronin B, Thelwall M. arXiv E-prints and the journal of record: An analysis of roles and relationships. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2014;65:1157-1169. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23044.
33. Marshall E. PNAS to join PubMed Central--on condition. Science. 1999;286:655-656.
34. McConnell J, Horton R. Lancet electronic research archive in international health and eprint server. The Lancet. 1999;354:2-3. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(99)00226-3.
35. National Institutes of Health Reporting preprints and other interim research products, notice number NOT-OD-17-050. [January 7, 2019];2017 https://grants.nih.gov/grants/guide/notice-files/NOT-OD-17-050.html
36. Nature Biotechnology Methods, preprints and papers. Nature Biotechnology. 2017;35:1113. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt.4044.
37. Özturan D. Paperkast: Academic article sharing and discussion. [January 8, 2019];2018 https://medium.com/@dogancan/paperkast-academic-article-sharing-and-discussion-e1aebc6fe66d
38. PostgreSQL Global Development Group 9.6.6PostgreSQL. 2017 https://www.postgresql.org
39. PostgreSQL Global Development Group Procedural languages. [January 1, 2019];PostgreSQL Documentation Version 9.4.20. 2018 https://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.4/xplang.html
40. Powell K. Does it take too long to publish research? Nature. 2016;530:148-151. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1038/530148a.
41. PrePubMed Monthly statistics for October 2018. [December 17, 2018];2018 http://www.prepubmed.org/monthly_stats/
42. Raff M, Johnson A, Walter P. Painful publishing. Science. 2008;321:36a. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1126/science.321.5885.36a.
43. Reitz K. 0.9.0Requests-HTML. 2018 https://github.com/kennethreitz/requests-html
44. Ringelhan S, Wollersheim J, Welpe IM. I like, I cite? Do Facebook likes predict the impact of scientific work? PLOS ONE. 2015;10:e0134389. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0134389.
45. Rørstad K, Aksnes DW. Publication rate expressed by age, gender and academic position - A large-scale analysis of Norwegian academic staff. Journal of Informetrics. 2015;9:317-333. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2015.02.003.
46. Royle S. What the world is waiting for. [December 29, 2018];Quantixed. 2014 https://quantixed.org/2014/10/17/what-the-world-is-waiting-for/
47. Royle S. Waiting to happen II: Publication lag times. [December 29, 2018];Quantixed. 2015 https://quantixed.org/2015/03/16/waiting-to-happen-ii-publication-lag-times/
48. Schloss PD. Preprinting microbiology. mBio. 2017;8:e00438. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00438-17.
49. Schmid MW. e2af128crawlBiorxiv. 2016 https://github.com/MWSchmid/crawlBiorxiv/blob/master/README.md
50. Schwarz GJ, Kennicutt RC. Demographic and citation trends in astrophysical journal papers and preprints. arXiv. 2004 https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0411275
51. Serghiou S, Ioannidis JPA. Altmetric scores, citations, and publication of studies posted as preprints. Jama. 2018;319:402-404. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2017.21168.
52. Sever R. Twitter post. 1 Nov 2018, 9:29 AM. [April 12, 2019];2018 https://twitter.com/cshperspectives/status/1058002994413924352
53. Smaglik P. E-biomed becomes PubMed Central. [December 29, 2018];The Scientist. 1999 https://www.the-scientist.com/news/e-biomed-becomes-pubmed-central-56359
54. Snyder SH. Science interminable: Blame Ben? PNAS. 2013;110:2428-2429. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.201300924.
55. Stop Predatory Journals List of predatory journals. [December 28, 2018];2018 https://predatoryjournals.com/journals/
56. Stuart T. bioRxiv. [January 2, 2019];2016 http://timoast.github.io/blog/2016-03-01-biorxiv/
57. Stuart T. bioRxiv 2017 update. [January 2, 2019];2017 http://timoast.github.io/blog/biorxiv-2017-update/
58. The Lancet Electronic Research Archive ERA home. [January 3, 2019]; Archive.org Snapshots, 22 Apr 2005 and 30 Jul 2005. 2005 https://web.archive.org/web/20050422224839/http://www.thelancet.com/era
59. The PLoS Medicine Editors The impact factor game. PLOS Medicine. 2006;3:e291. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.0030291.
60. Thelwall M, Haustein S, Larivière V, Sugimoto CR. Do altmetrics work? Twitter and ten other social web services. PLOS ONE. 2013;8:e64841. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0064841.
61. Tort AB, Targino ZH, Amaral OB. Rising publication delays inflate journal impact factors. PLOS ONE. 2012;7:e53374. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0053374.
62. upvote.pub Frontpage." Archive.org snapshot. [December 29, 2018];2018 https://web.archive.org/web/20180430180959/https://upvote.pub/
63. Vale RD. Accelerating scientific publication in biology. PNAS. 2015;112:13439-13446. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1511912112.
64. van der Silk N, Harrow A, Mispy J, Bacon D, Flammia S, Oppenheim J, Paynor J, Reichardt B, Rosgen B, Schaffner C, Toner B. About SciRate. [December 28, 2018];2018https://scirate.com/about
65. Varmus H. E-BIOMED: A proposal for electronic publications in the biomedical sciences. [December 28, 2018];National Institutes of Health. Archive.org Snapshot, 18 Oct 2015. 1999 https://web.archive.org/web/20151018182443/https://www.nih.gov/about/director/pubmedcentral/ebiomedarch.htm
66. Vence T. Journals seek out preprints. [January 7, 2019];The Scientist. 2017 https://www.the-scientist.com/news-opinion/journals-seek-out-preprints-32183
67. Verma IM. Preprint servers facilitate scientific discourse. PNAS. 2017;114:12630. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1716857114.
68. Wang Z, Glänzel W, Chen Y. How Self-Archiving influences the citation impact of a paper: A bibliometric analysis of arXiv papers and non-arXiv papers in the field of information and library science. Proceedings of the 23rd International Conference on Science and Technology Indicators; Leiden, The Netherlands. 2018. pp. 323-330.
69. Xia J, Harmon JL, Connolly KG, Donnelly RM, Anderson MR, Howard HA. Who publishes in “predatory” journals? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology. 2015;66:1406-1417. DOI: Https://doi.org/10.1002/asi.23265.