The prehistory of biology preprints: A forgotten experiment from the 1960s

PLoS Biology

Volumn 15, Issue 11, 2017, Pages

  Cobb, Matthew ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOMEDICINE; EXPERIMENT; INFORMATION; INFORMATION EXCHANGE GROUPS; NATIONAL HEALTH ORGANIZATION; NOTE; PUBLICATION; RESEARCH; SCIENTIFIC LITERATURE; HISTORY; HUMAN; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION SERVICE; INTERNET; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PROCEDURES; PUBLISHING; STANDARDS; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH; HISTORY, 20TH CENTURY; HISTORY, 21ST CENTURY; HUMANS; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION SERVICES; INTERNET; NATIONAL INSTITUTES OF HEALTH (U.S.); PUBLISHING; UNITED STATES;

EID: 85036582669     PISSN: 15449173     EISSN: 15457885     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.2003995     Document Type: Note

References (68)

1. Kaiser J, The preprint dilemma. Science. 2017; 357:1344–1349. doi: 10.1126/science.357.6358.1344 28963238
2. Vale RD, Accelerating scientific publication in biology. PNAS. 2015; 112:1349–13446.
3. Ginsparg P, Preprint déjà vu. EMBO J. 2016; 315:2620–2625.
4. Wykle SC, Enclaves of anarchy: Preprint sharing, 1940–1990. Proc Assoc Info Sci Tech. 2014; 51:1–10.
5. Larivière V, Sugimoto CR, Milojević S, Cronin B, Thelwall M, arXiv e-prints and the journal of record: An analysis of roles and relationships. J Assoc Info Sci Tech. 2014; 61:1157–1169.
6. Till JE, Predecessors of preprint servers. Learn Publ. 2001; 14:7–13.
7. Kling R, The internet and unrefereed scholarly publishing. Ann Rev Info Sci Tech. 2004; 591–631.
8. Heenan WF, Weeks DC. Informal communication among scientists: a study of the Information Exchange Group program (Part I). National Technical Information Service, US Department of Commerce. AD 726 650; 1971. http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/726650.pdf
9. Green D, Death of an experiment. Int Sci Tech. 1967; 65:82–88.
10. EC Albritton to FHC Crick, 27 January 1961. CSHL Archives Repository, SB/11/1/1/43. http://libgallery.cshl.edu/archive/files/1539b09ef1f1623de2858425cda02583.jpg
11. FHC Crick to EC Albritton, 7 February 1961. CSHL Archives Repository, SB/1/1/1/42/. http://libgallery.cshl.edu/archive/files/fac7e07201d825219d962376b162aa48.jpg
12. Cobb M, Life’s greatest secret: the race to crack the genetic code. London: Profile; 2015.
13. EC Albritton to FHC Crick, 20 February 1961. CSHL Archives Repository, SB/11/1/1/41. http://libgallery.cshl.edu/archive/files/356241a82bf91daba21a1529f4355fe8.jpg
14. Beinert H, Stumph PK, Wakil SJ, David Ezra Green, August 5, 1910–July 8, 1983. Biog Mem Nat Acad Sci. 2004; 84:113–146.
15. Albritton EC. The Information Exchange Group—an experiment in communication. Presented before the Institute of Advances in Biomedical Communication, American University and George Washington University, March 1965. https://saltworks.stanford.edu/assets/py379dm4170.pdf
16. Anonymous. Proposed creation of Information Exchange Groups serviced by an Exchange Center. No authors, 30 January 1961. CSHL Archives Repository, SB/11/1/1/44-45. http://libgallery.cshl.edu/archive/files/35f488909b1283140a5c8b6e2d53e029.jpg and http://libgallery.cshl.edu/archive/files/4ad06ac38e6e4a6e0909302e7982fe94.jpg
17. Albritton EC. To ‘foreign’ members. 18 August 1965. Wellcome Library Archive PPCRI/D/1/1/1. https://wellcomelibrary.org/item/b18188965
18. Moore AC, Preprints. An old information device with new outlooks. J Chem Doc. 1965; 5:126–128.
19. Wyatt HV, Research newsletters in the biological sciences—a neglected literature service. J Doc. 1967; 23:321–327.
20. Bever AT, The duality of quick and archival communication. J Chem Doc. 1969; 9:3–6.
21. Green DE. Information exchange. IEG 1, Memo 24; 1963. CSHL Archives Repository, SB/1/1/1/19. http://libgallery.cshl.edu/items/show/59123
22. Green DE, An experiment in communication: the Information Exchange Group. Science. 1964; 143:308–309.
23. EC Albritton to S Brenner, 14 November 1963. CSHL Archives Repository, SB/1/1/1/17. http://libgallery.cshl.edu/items/show/59122
24. S Brenner to EC Albritton, 4 December 1963. CSHL Archives Repository, SB/1/1/1/16. http://libgallery.cshl.edu/items/show/59121
25. FHC Crick to EC Albritton, 19 October 1965, Wellcome Library Archive, PPCRI/D/1/1/1. https://wellcomelibrary.org/item/b18188965
26. FHC Crick to EV Albritton, 21 May 1965, Wellcome Library Archive, PPCRI/D/1/1/1. https://wellcomelibrary.org/item/b18188965
27. Correspondence between Maxine Singer and Francis Crick, October 1965, Wellcome Library Archive, SB/11/1/130. https://wellcomelibrary.org/item/b19978248
28. Buranyi S, Is the staggeringly profitable business of scientific publishing bad for science?The Guardian; 27June2017. https://www.theguardian.com/science/2017/jun/27/profitable-business-scientific-publishing-bad-for-science
29. Fyfe A, Coate K, Curry S, Lawson S, Moxham N, Røstvik CM, Untangling Academic Publishing: A history of the relationship between commercial interests, academic prestige and the circulation of research. Zenodo; 25May2017. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.546100
30. Lynch MF, Computers in the library. Nature. 1966; 212:1402–1404. 21090404
31. De Reuck A, Knight J, Communication in science: documentation and automation. London: Churchill; 1967.
32. President’s Science Advisory ServiceScience, government and information. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office; 1963.
33. de Price SDJ, de Beaver BD, Collaboration in an invisible college. Am Psych. 1966; 21:1011–1018.
34. Swanson DR, On improving communication among scientists. Bull Atom Sci. 1966; 22(2):8–12.
35. Moravcsik M, Private and public communications in physics. Physics Today. March1965;23–26.
36. Moravcsik M., Some comments on Pasternack’s criticism. Physics Today. June1966;71–73.
37. Moravcsik M, Physics Information Exchange—a communication experiment. Physics Today. June1966;62–69.
38. Dray S, Information Exchange Group No. 5. Science. 1966; 153:694–695.
39. AnonymousFour years of information exchange. Nature. 1966; 211:904–905. 5966652
40. AnonymousUnpublished literature. Nature. 1966; 211:333–334.
41. AnonymousPreprints galore. Nature. 1966; 211:897–898. 5966651
42. Abelson PH, Information exchange groups. Science. 1966; 154:727. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3750.727 17745976
43. Thorpe WV, Biological journals and exchange groups. Nature. 1967; 156:547–548
44. AnonymousPreprints made outlaws. Nature. 1966; 212:4.
45. Confrey EA, Information Exchange Groups to be discontinued. Science. 1966; 154:843. 6003532
46. Siekevitz P, Doermann AH, Gallant JA, McCarthy BJ, Morris DR, Nester E, Rutter WJ, Jukes TH, Green DE, Gergely Dameshek W, Baron S, IEG's: Some evaluations. Science. 1966; 154:332–336. doi: 10.1126/science.154.3747.332 17751689
47. Spaet TH, Preprints galore. Nature. 1966; 212:226.
48. Duysens LNM, Holloway AH, Mustard JF, Anonymous Preprints. Nature. 1966; 212:558.
49. AnonymousSecret colleges end. Nature. 1966; 212:865–866. 6003720
50. AnonymousInformation exchange. N Engl J Med. 1967; 276:238–239. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196701262760410 6071165
51. AnonymousDefinition of ‘sole contribution’. N Engl J Med. 1969; 281:676–677. doi: 10.1056/NEJM196909182811208 5807917
52. Kling R, Spector LB, Fortuna J, The real stakes of virtual publishing: the transformation of E-Biomed into PubMed Central. J Am Soc Inf Sci Tech. 2004; 55:127–148.
53. Pasternack S, (1966) Criticism of the proposed Physics Information Exchange. Physics Today. June1966; 63–69.
54. Goudsmit SA, Communication problems. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1965; 15:543–544.
55. Goudsmit SA, The value of refereeing papers. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1966; 17:845.
56. Goudsmit SA, Comments. Phys. Rev. Lett. 1967; 18:301.
57. Albritton EC, Information Exchange Groups. Nature. 1967; 213:1065.
58. Wolstenholme GEW, O’Connor M, (eds). Interferon: CIBA Foundation Symposium. London: Churchill; 1967.
59. Woodruff M, Unpublished literature. Nature. 1966; 211:560.
60. AnonymousClosing the stable door. Nature. 1967; 213:537–538.
61. Scientific and technical communication: a pressing national problem and recommendations for its solution. Washington: National Academy of Sciences; 1969.
62. Piternick AB, Attempts to find alternatives to the scientific journal: a brief review. J Acad Libr. 1989; 15:260–266.
63. Rosenfeld A, Wakerling RK, Addis L, Gex R, Taylor RJ. Preprints in particles and fields. SLAC-PUB-0710; 1970. http://www.slac.stanford.edu/cgi-wrap/getdoc/slac-pub-0710.pdf
64. Ginsparg P, arXiv at 20. Nature. 2011; 476:145–147. doi: 10.1038/476145a 21833066
65. Varmus H, The art and politics of science. New York: Norton; 2009.
66. Relman AS, The NIH ‘E-Biomed’ proposal—a potential threat to the evaluation and orderly dissemination of new clinical studies. N Engl J Med. 1999; 340:1828–1829. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199906103402309 10362828
67. Vosshall LB, The glacial pace of scientific publishing: why it hurts everyone and what we can do to fix it. FASEB J. 2012; 26:3589–3593. doi: 10.1096/fj.12-0901ufm 22935905
68. San Francisco Declaration on Research Assessment; December 2012. http://www.ascb.org/dora/