Biopower and biofertilizer production from organic municipal solid waste: An exergoenvironmental analysis

Renewable Energy

Volumn 143, Issue , 2019, Pages 64-76

  Aghbashlo, Mortaza ^a   Tabatabaei, Meisam ^b,c,d   Soltanian, Salman ^b   Ghanavati, Hossein ^b,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEHRAN   (Iran)

^b BIOFUEL RESEARCH TEAM BRTEAM   (Iran)

^c AGRICULTURAL BIOTECHNOLOGY RESEARCH INSTITUTE OF IRAN ABRII   (Iran)

^d UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MARA   (Malaysia)

Author keywords

Biofertilizer; Biopower; Environmental impact rate; Exergoenvironmental analysis; Municipal solid waste

Indexed keywords

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; EXERGY; FERTILIZERS;

BIO FERTILIZERS; BIO-POWER; COMPONENT LEVELS; ENVIRONMENTAL BURDENS; ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE; EXERGOENVIRONMENTAL ANALYSIS; OPERATING DATA; ORGANIC MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTES;

MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE;

ANAEROBIC DIGESTION; BIOFERTILIZER; ENERGY DISSIPATION; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; EXERGY; MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT;

EID: 85065837880     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: 18790682     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2019.04.109     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Zaman, A.U., A comprehensive study of the environmental and economic benefits of resource recovery from global waste management systems. J. Clean. Prod. 124 (2016), 41–50.
2. Forster-Carneiro, T., Pérez, M., Romero, L.I., Anaerobic digestion of municipal solid wastes: dry thermophilic performance. Bioresour. Technol. 99 (2008), 8180–8184.
3. Clarke, W.P., The uptake of anaerobic digestion for the organic fraction of municipal solid waste–push versus pull factors. Bioresour. Technol. 249 (2018), 1040–1043.
4. Nayal, F.S., Mammadov, A., Ciliz, N., Environmental assessment of energy generation from agricultural and farm waste through anaerobic digestion. J. Environ. Manag. 184 (2016), 389–399.
5. Rajaeifar, M.A., Ghanavati, H., Dashti, B.B., Heijungs, R., Aghbashlo, M., Tabatabaei, M., Electricity generation and GHG emission reduction potentials through different municipal solid waste management technologies: a comparative review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 79 (2017), 414–439.
6. Mandegari, M.A., Farzad, S., van Rensburg, E., Görgens, J.F., Multi-criteria analysis of a biorefinery for co-production of lactic acid and ethanol from sugarcane lignocellulose. Biofuel. Bioprod. Bioref. 11 (2017), 971–990.
7. Ahanchi, M., Tabatabaei, M., Aghbashlo, M., Rezaei, K., Talebi, F., Ghaffari, A., Khoshnevisan, B., Khounani, Z., Pistachio (Pistachia vera)wastes valorization: enhancement of biodiesel oxidation stability using hull extracts of different varieties. J. Clean. Prod. 185 (2018), 852–859.
8. Peñarrubia Fernandez, I.A., Liu, D.H., Zhao, J., LCA studies comparing alkaline and immobilized enzyme catalyst processes for biodiesel production under Brazilian conditions. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 119 (2017), 117–127.
9. Lijó, L., González-García, S., Bacenetti, J., Fiala, M., Feijoo, G., Lema, J.M., Moreira, M.T., Life Cycle Assessment of electricity production in Italy from anaerobic co-digestion of pig slurry and energy crops. Renew. Energy 68 (2014), 625–635.
10. Pérez-Camacho, M.N., Curry, R., Cromie, T., Life cycle environmental impacts of substituting food wastes for traditional anaerobic digestion feedstocks. Waste Manag. 73 (2018), 140–155.
11. Ramírez-Arpide, F.R., Demirer, G.N., Gallegos-Vázquez, C., Hernández-Eugenio, G., Santoyo-Cortés, V.H., Espinosa-Solares, T., Life cycle assessment of biogas production through anaerobic co-digestion of nopal cladodes and dairy cow manure. J. Clean. Prod. 172 (2018), 2313–2322.
12. Geerts, M., Van Veghel, A., Zisopoulos, F.K., Van der Padt, A., Van der Goot, A.J., Exergetic comparison of three different processing routes for yellow pea (Pisum sativum): functionality as a driver in sustainable process design. J. Clean. Prod. 183 (2018), 979–987.
13. Zisopoulos, F.K., Moejes, S.N., Rossier-Miranda, F.J., van der Goot, A.J., Boom, R.M., Exergetic comparison of food waste valorization in industrial bread production. Energy 82 (2015), 640–649.
14. Genc, M., Genc, S., Goksungur, Y., Exergy analysis of wine production: red wine production process as a case study. Appl. Therm. Eng. 117 (2017), 511–521.
15. Aghbashlo, M., Tabatabaei, M., Jazini, H., Ghaziaskar, H.S., Exergy-based optimization of a continuous reactor applied to produce value-added chemicals from glycerol through esterification with acetic acid. Energy 150 (2018), 351–362.
16. Aghbashlo, M., Rosen, M.A., Consolidating exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses using the emergy concept for better understanding energy conversion systems. J. Clean. Prod. 172 (2018), 696–708.
17. Yağlı, H., Koç, Y., Koç, A., Görgülü, A., Tandiroğlu, A., Parametric optimization and exergetic analysis comparison of subcritical and supercritical organic Rankine cycle (ORC)for biogas fuelled combined heat and power (CHP)engine exhaust gas waste heat. Energy 111 (2016), 923–932.
18. Prodromidis, G.N., Coutelieris, F.A., Thermodynamic analysis of biogas fed solid oxide fuel cell power plants. Renew. Energy 108 (2017), 1–10.
19. Mudasar, R., Aziz, F., Kim, M.-H., Thermodynamic analysis of organic Rankine cycle used for flue gases from biogas combustion. Energy Convers. Manag. 153 (2017), 627–640.
20. Meyer, L., Tsatsaronis, G., Buchgeister, J., Schebek, L., Exergoenvironmental analysis for evaluation of the environmental impact of energy conversion systems. Energy 34 (2009), 75–89.
21. Khoshgoftar Manesh, M.H., Navid, P., Baghestani, M., Abadi, S.K., Rosen, M.A., Blanco, A.M., Amidpour, M., Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental evaluation of the coupling of a gas fired steam power plant with a total site utility system. Energy Convers. Manag. 77 (2014), 469–483.
22. Aghbashlo, M., Tabatabaei, M., Hosseinpour, S., On the exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental evaluation and optimization of biodiesel synthesis from waste cooking oil (WCO)using a low power, high frequency ultrasonic reactor. Energy Convers. Manag. 164 (2018), 385–398.
23. Aghbashlo, M., Tabatabaei, M., Jazini, H., Ghaziaskar, H.S., Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental co-optimization of continuous fuel additives (acetins)synthesis from glycerol esterification with acetic acid using Amberlyst 36 catalyst. Energy Convers. Manag. 165 (2018), 183–194.
24. Barati, M.R., Aghbashlo, M., Ghanavati, H., Tabatabaei, M., Sharifi, M., Javadirad, G., Dadak, A., Mojarab Soufiyan, M., Comprehensive exergy analysis of a gas engine-equipped anaerobic digestion plant producing electricity and biofertilizer from organic fraction of municipal solid waste. Energy Convers. Manag. 151 (2017), 753–763.
25. Aghbashlo, M., Tabatabaei, M., Soltanian, S., Ghanavati, H., Dadak, A., Comprehensive exergoeconomic analysis of a municipal solid waste digestion plant equipped with a biogas genset. Waste Manag. 87 (2019), 485–498.
26. Gupta, R.B., Demirbas, A., Gasoline, Diesel, and Ethanol Biofuels from Grasses and Plants. 2010, Cambridge University Press, New York, USA.
27. Leonzio, G., Upgrading of biogas to bio-methane with chemical absorption process: simulation and environmental impact. J. Clean. Prod. 131 (2016), 364–375.
28. Qian, Y., Sun, S., Ju, D., Shan, X., Lu, X., Review of the state-of-the-art of biogas combustion mechanisms and applications in internal combustion engines. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 69 (2017), 50–58.
29. Szargut, J., Morris, D.R., Steward, F.R., Energy Analysis of Thermal, Chemical, and Metallurgical Processes. 1988.
30. Song, G., Xiao, J., Zhao, H., Shen, L., A unified correlation for estimating specific chemical exergy of solid and liquid fuels. Energy 40 (2012), 164–173.
31. Lazzaretto, A., Tsatsaronis, G., SPECO: a systematic and general methodology for calculating efficiencies and costs in thermal systems. Energy 31 (2006), 1257–1289.
32. Rajaeifar, M.A., Hemayati, S.S., Tabatabaei, M., Aghbashlo, M., Mahmoudi, S.B., A review on beet sugar industry with a focus on implementation of waste-to-energy strategy for power supply. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 103 (2019), 423–442.
33. Kim, M., Kim, D., Esfahani, I.J., Lee, S., Kim, M., Yoo, C., Performance assessment and system optimization of a combined cycle power plant (CCPP)based on exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses. Kor. J. Chem. Eng. 34 (2017), 6–19.
34. Petrakopoulou, F., Boyano, A., Cabrera, M., Tsatsaronis, G., Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of a combined cycle power plant with chemical looping technology. Int. J. Greenh. Gas Contr. 5 (2011), 475–482.
35. Cavalcanti, E.J.C., Exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental analyses of an integrated solar combined cycle system. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 67 (2017), 507–519.
36. Aghbashlo, M., Rosen, M.A., Exergoeconoenvironmental analysis as a new concept for developing thermodynamically, economically, and environmentally sound energy conversion systems. J. Clean. Prod. 187 (2018), 190–204.