Freshwater Habitats and Freshwater-Dependent Habitats in Poland

Handbook of Environmental Chemistry

Volumn 87, Issue , 2020, Pages 251-268

  Grzybowski, Mirosław ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARMIA AND MAZURY IN OLSZTYN   (Poland)

Author keywords

Biodiversity conservation; Freshwater habitats; Freshwater dependent habitats; Natura 2000

Indexed keywords

EID: 85065392866     PISSN: 1867979X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-12139-6_12     Document Type: Chapter

References (100)

1. Rodrigues ASL, Andelman SJ, Bakarr MI, Boitani L, Brooks TM, Cowling RM, Fishpool LDC, da Fonseca GAB, Gaston KJ, Hoffmann M, Long JS, Marquet PA, Pilgrim JD, Pressey RL, Schipper J, Sechrest W, Stuart SN, Underhill LG, Waller RW, Watts MEJ, Yan X (2004) Effectiveness of the global protected area network in representing species diversity. Nature 428:640–643
2. Deguignet M, Juffe-Bignoli D, Harrison J, MacSharry B, Burgess N, Kingston N (2014) 2014 United Nations list of protected areas. UNEP-WCMC, Cambridge, p 44
3. Blicharska M, Orlikowska EH, Roberge JM, Grodzińska-Jurczak M (2016) What can social science tell us about conservation? Review of the Natura 2000 research. Biol Conserv 199:110–122
4. EC (2013) The economic benefits of the Natura 2000 network. Synthesis report. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg, p 76. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/natura2000/financing/docs/ENV-12-018_LR_Final1.pdf. Accessed June 2018
5. Maes J, Paracchini ML, Zulian G, Dunbar MB, Alkemade R (2012) Synergies and trade-offs between ecosystem service supply, biodiversity, and habitat conservation status in Europe. Biol Conserv 155:1–12
6. Orlikowska EH, Roberge JM, Blicharska M, Mikusiński G (2016) Gaps in ecological research on the world’s largest internationally coordinated network of protected areas: a review of Natura 2000. Biol Conserv 200:216–227
7. EU (2011) Biodiversity strategy to 2020. Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg
8. Pullin AS, Knight TM, Stone DA, Charman K (2004) Do conservation managers use scientific evidence to support their decision-making? Biol Conserv 119:245–252
9. Maiorano L, Falcucci A, Garton EO, Boitani L (2007) Contribution of the Natura 2000 network to biodiversity conservation in Italy. Conserv Biol 21:1433–1444
10. D’Amen M, Bombi P, Campanaro A, Zapponi L, Bologna MA, Mason F (2013) Protected areas and insect conservation: questioning the effectiveness of Natura 2000 network for saproxylic beetles in Italy. Anim Conserv 16:370–378
11. Kati V, Hovardas T, Dieterich M, Ibisch PL, Mihok B, Selva N (2014) The challenge of implementing the European network of protected areas Natura 2000. Conserv Biol 29:260–270
12. Popescu VD, Rozylowicz L, Niculae IM, Cucu AL, Hartel T (2014) Species, habitats, society: an evaluation of research supporting EU’s Natura 2000 network. PLoS One 9:13–22
13. Vörösmarty CJ, McIntyre P, Gessner MO, Dudgeon D, Prusevich A, Green P, Glidden S, Bunn SE, Sullivan CA, Liermann CR (2010) Global threats to human water security and river biodiversity. Nature 467:555–561
14. Malcolm JR, Liu C, Neilson RP, Hansen L, Hannah LEE (2006) Global warming and extinctions of endemic species from biodiversity hotspots. Conserv Biol 20:538–548
15. Ortmann-Ajkai A, Csicsek G, Hollós R, Magyaros V, Wágner L, Lóczy D (2018) Twentyyears’ changes of wetland vegetation: effects of floodplain-level threats. Wetlands. https://doi. org/10.1007/s13157-018-1002-0
16. Romanowski J, Matuszkiewiecz J, Franz KW, Kowalska A, Kozłowska A (2005) Evaluation of ecological consequences of development scenarios for the Vistula River. Vistula Econet Development and Implementation (VEDI). Institute of Biology CBE/PAN-IGiPZ/DLG/ ALTERRA, Warsaw
17. Scholz M, Mehl D, Schulz-Zunkel C (2012) Okosystemfunktionen von Flussauen. Analyse und Bewertung von Hochwasserretention, Nahrstoffruckhalt, Kohlenstoffvorrat, Treibhausgasemissionen und Habitatfunktion. Naturschutz Biol Vielfalt 124:2
18. Johnson WC, Dixon MD, Scott ML, Raabe L, Larson G, Volke M, Werner B (2012) Forty years of vegetation change on the Missouri River floodplain. Bioscience 62:123–135
19. Pataki B, Zsuffa I, Hunyady A (2013) Vulnerability assessment for supporting the revitalization of river floodplains. Environ Sci 34:69–78
20. Peršić V, Horvatić J, Has-Schön E, Bogut I (2009) Changes in N and P limitation induced by water level fluctuations in Nature Park Kopacki Rit (Croatia): nutrient enrichment bioassay. Aquat Ecol 43:27–36
21. Grzybowski M (2013) Factors affecting the pattern of macrophyte distribution in natural lakes. Fresenius Environ Bull 22(11):3199–3209
22. Grzybowski M (2014a) Determinants of the diversity of macrophytes in natural lakes affected by land use in the catchment, water chemistry and morphometry lakes. J Elem 19(2):401–422
23. Grzybowski M (2014b) Natural dimictic and polymictic lakes: similarities and differences in relationships among chlorophyll, nutrients, Secchi depth, and aquatic macrophytes. J Freshw Ecol 29(1):53–69
24. Davis M, Naumann S, McFarland K, Graf A, Evans D (2014) Literature review: the ecological effectiveness of the Natura 2000 network. ETC/BD report to the EEA, p 30
25. Angelstam P, Roberge J-M, Lõhmus A, Bergmanis M, Brazaitis G, Dönz-Breuss M, Edenius L, Kosiński Z, Kurlavičius P, Lārmanis V, Lūkins V, Mikusiński G, Račinskis E, Strazds M, Tryjanowski P (2004) Habitat modelling as a tool for landscape-scale conservation – a review of parameters for focal forest birds. Ecol Bull 51:427–453
26. Gustafsson L, Felton A, Felton AM, Brunet J, Caruso A, Hjältén J, Lindbladh M, Ranius T, Roberge J-M, Weslien J (2015) Natural versus national boundaries: the importance of considering biogeographical patterns in forest conservation policy. Conserv Lett 8:50–57
27. Whittaker RJ, Araújo MB, Jepson P, Ladle RJ, Watson JEM, Willis KJ (2005) Conservation biogeography: assessment and prospect. Divers Distrib 11:3–23
28. Guerrero AM, Mcallister RR, Wilson KA (2015) Achieving cross-scale collaboration for large scale conservation initiatives. Conserv Lett 8:107–117
29. Arlettaz R, Schaub M, Fournier J, Reichlin TS, Sierro A, Watson JEM, Braunisch V (2010) From publications to public actions: when conservation biologists bridge the gap between research and implementation. Bioscience 60:835–842
30. Hermoso V, Clavero M, Villero D, Brotons L (2016) EU’s conservation efforts need more strategic investment to meet continental commitments. Conserv Lett 10:231–237
31. SDF Standard data form Natura 2000 (2018.) https://danepubliczne.gov.pl/dataset/bazadanych-obszarow-natura-2000/. Accessed June 2018
32. GDEP General Directorate for Environmental Protection in Poland (2018) Information and communication platform. http://pzo.gdos.gov.pl/. Accessed June 2018
33. GIEP General Inspectorate for Environmental Protection in Poland (2018) Monitoring of species and natural habitats. State Environmental Monitoring. http://siedliska.gios.gov.pl/pl/projekt-raportow-do-ke/projekt-raportow. Accessed June 2018
34. INC Institute of Nature Conservation of the Polish Academy of Sciences (2018) Monitoring of species and natural habitats with special regard to special areas of Natura 2000 habitat protection. http://www.iop.krakow.pl/cn2000/monitoring/ZestawienieWynikow.aspx. Accessed June 2018
35. Eionet (2018) European Topic Centre on Biological Diversity. https://bd.eionet.europa.eu/. Accessed June 2018
36. Biodiversity Information System for Europe (BISE) (2018.) https://biodiversity.europa.eu/info. Accessed June 2018
37. Brooks TM, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Rylands AB, Konstant WR, Flick P, Pilgrim J (2002) Habitat loss and extinction in the hotspots of biodiversity. Conserv Biol 16:909–923
38. Hanski I (2011) Habitat loss, the dynamics of biodiversity, and a perspective on conservation. Ambio 40:248–255
39. Groom MJ, Meffe GK, Carroll CR (2006) Principles of conservation biology. Sinauer, Sunderland
40. Costanza R, Sutton P, van der Ploeg S, Anderson SJ, Kubiszewski I, Farber S, Turner EK (2014) Changes in the global value of ecosystem services. Glob Environ Chang 26:152–158
41. Vaughn C (2010) Biodiversity losses and ecosystem function in freshwaters: emerging conclusions and research directions. Bioscience 60:25–35
42. Grodzińska-Jurczak M (2008) Rethinking of nature conservation policy in Poland: the need of human dimensions approach. Hum Dimens Wildl 13:380–381
43. EC (2000) Council Directive 2000/60/EC of 23 October 2000 establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/En/TXT/? uri¼CELEX:32000L0060. Accessed June 2018
44. EC (2016) Natura 2000. Nature and Biodiversity Newsletter No. 40, July 2016. European Commission, Brussels. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/nature/info/pubs/docs/nat2000newsl/nat40_en.pdf. Accessed June 2018
45. CBD-UNEP (2010) Strategic plan for biodiversity 2011–2020 and the Aichi targets “living in harmony with nature”. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal
46. CBD-UNEP (2013) Quick guides to the Aichi biodiversity targets. Secretariat of the Convention on Biological Diversity, Montreal
47. EEA (2015) State of the environment report 2015. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen. http://www.eea.europa.eu/soer. Accessed June 2018
48. CIS (2013) Strengthening consistency, coordination and cooperation between nature, biodiversity, water and marine policy. In: Joint meeting of the Nature, Marine and Water Directors meeting of 4 December 2013, Vilnius. Outcome of the 1st joint directors’ meeting (final version)
49. CIS (2013) Informal meeting of water and marine directors of the European Union, candidate and EFTA countries. Vilnius, 4th and 5th of May 2013. Final synthesis
50. CIS (2015) Common implementation strategy for the Water Framework Directive (2000/60/ EC) and the Floods Directive (2007/60/EC): Work Programme 2016–2018
51. Tockner K, Stanford JA (2002) Riverine floodplains: present state and future trends. Environ Conserv 29:308–330
52. Čížková H, Květ J, Comín FA, Laiho R, Pokorný J, Pitchart D (2013) Actual state of European wetlands and their possible future in the context of global climate change. Aquat Sci 75:3–26
53. Zorilla-Miras P, Palomo I, Gomes-Baggenthun E, Martin-Lopez B, Lomas PL, Montes P (2014) Effects of land-use change on wetland ecosystem services: a case study in the Doñana marshes (SW Spain). Landsc Urban Plan 122:160–174
54. Hein T, Schwarz U, Habersack H, Nichersu J, Preiner S, Willby N, Weigelhofer G (2016) Current status and restoration options for floodplains along the Danube River. Sci Total Environ 543:778–790
55. Harrison PA, Vandewalle M, Sykes MT, Berry PM, Bugter R, de Bello F, Feld CK, Grandin U, Harrington R, Haslett JR, Jongman RHG, Luck GW, da Silva PM, Moora M, Settele J, Sousa JP, Zobel M (2010) Identifying and prioritizing services in European terrestrial and freshwater ecosystems. Biodivers Conserv 19:2791–2821
56. Blackwell MSA, Pilgrim ES (2011) Ecosystem services delivered by small-scale wetlands. Hydrobiol Sci J 56:1467–1484
57. Mölder A, Schneider E (2011) On the beautiful diverse Danube? Danubian floodplain forest vegetation and flora under the influence of river eutrophication. River Res Appl 27:881–894
58. Janssen JAM, Rodwell JS, Garcia Criado M, Gubbay S, Haynes T, Nieto A, Sanders N, Landucci F, Loidi J, Ssymank A, Tahvanainen T, Valderrabano M, Acosta A, Aronsson M, Arts G, Attorre F, Bergmeier E, Bijlsma R-J, Bioret F, Bita-Nicole C, Biurrun I, Calix M, Capelo J, Carni M, Chytry M, Dengler J, Dimopoulos P, Essl F, Gardjfell H, Gigante D, Giusso del Galdo G, Hajek M, Jansen F, Kapfer J, Mickolajczak A, Molina JA, Molnár Z, Paternoster D, Piernik A, Poulin B, Renaux B, Schaminee JHJ, Sumberova K, Toivonen H, Tonteri T, Tsiripidis I, Tzonev R, Valachovic M (2016) European red list of habitats, part 2: terrestrial and freshwater habitats. EU, p 44
59. Ward JV, Stanford JA (1995) Ecological connectivity in alluvial river ecosystems and its disruption by flow regulation. Regul Rivers Res Manag 11:105–119
60. Schindler S, O’Neill FH, Biró M, Damm C, Gasso V, Kanka R, van der Sluis T, Krug A, Lauwaars S, Sebesvari Z, Pusch M, Baranovsky B, Ehlert T, Neukirchen B, Martin JR, Euller K, Mauerhofer V, Wrbka T (2016) Multifunctional floodplain management and biodiversity effects: a knowledge synthesis for six European countries. Biodivers Conserv 25:1349–1382
61. Geilen N, Jochems H, Krebs L (2004) Integration of ecological aspects in flood protection strategies: defining an ecological minimum. River Res Appl 20:269–283
62. Klimo E, Hager H, Matic S, Anic I, Kulhavy J (2008) Floodplain forests of the temperate zone of Europe. Lesnicka Prace, Kostelec nad Cernymi lesy
63. Nijland HJ, Cals MJR (eds) (2001) River restoration in Europe: practical approaches. In: Proceedings of the conference. RIZA report nr 2001.023, Wageningen
64. Leyer I (2005) Predicting plant species responses to river regulation: the role of water level fluctuations. J Appl Ecol 42(2):239–250
65. Rinaldi M, Wyzga B, Dufour S, Bertoldi W, Gurnell A (2013) River processes and implications for fluvial ecogeomorphology: a European perspective. In: Shroder J, Butler DR, Hupp CR (eds) Treatise on geomorphology. Ecogeomorphology, vol 12. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 37–52
66. Moreno-Mateos D, Power ME, Comin FA, Yockteng R (2012) Structural and functional loss in restored wetland ecosystems. PLoS Biol 10:1–8
67. Toth L (2010) Unrealized expectations for restoration of a floodplain community. Restor Ecol 18:810–819
68. van Geest GJ, Wolters H, Roozen FCJM, Coops H, Roijackers RMM, Buijse AD, Scheffer M (2005) Water-level fluctuations affect macrophyte richness in floodplain lakes. Hydrobiologia 539:239–248
69. Brooker R, Young JC, Watt AD (2007) Climate change and biodiversity: impacts and policy development challenges – a European case study. Int J Biodivers Sci Manag 3:12–30
70. Pallemearts M, Parker CN, Shukla PR, Van Schaik LG (2005) The Greenland dialogue on climate change: a policy discussion paper
71. EU (2013) Framework for adaptation to climate change, leading to a comprehensive EU adaptation strategy by 2013. https://ec.europa.eu/clima/sites/clima/files/docs/eu_strategy_en. pdf. Accessed June 2018
72. Hefting MM, van den Heuvel RN, Verhoeven JTA (2013) Wetlands in agricultural landscapes for nitrogen attenuation and biodiversity enhancement: opportunities and limitations. Ecol Eng 56:5–13
73. Schnitzler AE, Hale BW, Alsum E (2005) Biodiversity of floodplain forests in Europe and eastern North America: a comparative study of the Rhine and Mississippi Valleys. Biodivers Conserv 14:97–117
74. Beltman B, Omtzigt NQA, Vermaat JE (2011) Turbary restoration meets variable success: does landscape structure force colonization success of wetland plants? Restor Ecol 19:185–193
75. Mitsch WJ, Zhang L, Stefanik KC, Nahlik AM, Anderson CJ, Bernal B, Hernandez M, Song K (2012) Creating wetlands: primary succession, water quality changes, and self-design over 15 years. Bioscience 62:237–250
76. Schindler S, Kropik M, Euller K, Bunting SW, Schulz-Zunkel C, Hermann A, Hainz-Renetzeder C, Kanka R, Mauerhofer V, Gasso V, Krug A, Lauwaars S, Zulka KP, Henle K, Hoffmann M, Biró M, Essl F, Jaquier S, Balázs L, Borics G, Hudin S, Damm C, Pusch M, van der Sluis T, Sebesvári Z, Wrbka T (2013) Floodplain management in temperate regions: is multifunctionality enhancing biodiversity? Environ Evid 2:10
77. Jantke K, Schleupner C, Schneider UA (2011) Gap analysis of European wetland species: priority regions for expanding the Natura 2000 network. Biodivers Conserv 20:581–605
78. Forest Europe (2017) Forest Europe home page. http://foresteurope.org/. Accessed June 2018
79. EC (2017) EU forests and forest related policies. European Commission, DG Environment. http://ec.europa.eu/environment/forests/index_en.htm/. Accessed June 2018
80. Winter S (2012) Forest naturalness assessment as a component of biodiversity monitoring and conservation management. Forestry 85:293–304
81. Winter S, Vrska T, Begehold H (2013) Forest Naturalness as a key to forest biodiversity preservation. In: Kraus D, Krumm F (eds) Integrative approaches as an opportunity for the conservation of forest biodiversity. European Forest Institute, Joensuu, pp 52–63
82. Winter S, Fischer HS, Fischer A (2010) Relative quantitative reference approach for naturalness assessments of forests. For Ecol Manag 259:1624–1632
83. Peterken GF (1996) Natural woodland: ecology and conservation in northern temperate regions. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
84. Remmert H (2013) Ökologie: Ein Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin
85. Gibson L, Lee TM, Koh LP, Brook BW, Gardner TA, Barlow J, Carlos A, Peres A, Corey JA, Bradshaw WF, Laurance T, Lovejoy E, Sodhi NJ (2011) Primary forests are irreplaceable for sustaining tropical biodiversity. Nature 478:378–381
86. Götmark F (2013) Habitat management alternatives for conservation forests in the temperate zone: review, synthesis, and implications. For Ecol Manag 306:292–307
87. Paillet Y, Bergès L, Hjältén J, Ódor P, Avon C, Bernhardt-Römermann M, Bijlsma RJ, De Bruyn L, Fuhr M, Grandin U, Kanka R, Lundin L, Luque S, Magura T, Matesanz S, Mészáros I, Sebastià MT, Schmidt W, Standovár T, Tóthmérész B, Uotila A, Valladares F, Vellak K, Virtanen R (2010) Biodiversity differences between managed and unmanaged forests: meta-analysis of species richness in Europe. Conserv Biol 24:101–112
88. Tsiafouli MA, Apostolopoulou E, Mazaris AD, Kallimanis AS, Drakou EG, Pantis JD (2013) Human activities in Natura 2000 sites: a highly diversified conservation network. Environ Manag 51:1025–1033
89. Boitani L, Sutherland WJ (2015) Special section: conservation in Europe as a model for emerging conservation issues globally. Conserv Biol 29:975–977
90. Poschlod P, Wallis DeVries MF (2002) The historical and socioeconomic perspective of calcareous grasslands – lessons from the distant and recent past. Biol Conserv 104:361–376
91. Meilleur B (2010) The structure and role of folk ecological knowledge in Les Allues, Savoie (France). In: Johnson LM, Hunn ES (eds) Landscape ethnoecology. Concepts of biotic and physical space. Berghahn, New York, pp 159–174
92. Merunkova K, Preislerova Z, Chytry M (2012) White Carpathian grasslands: can local ecological factors explain their extraordinary species richness? Preslia 84:311–325
93. Wilson JB, Peet RK, Dengler J, Partel M (2012) Plant species richness: the world records. J Veg Sci 23:796–802
94. Babai D, Molnar A, Molnar Z (2014) Traditional ecological knowledge and land use in Gyimes (Eastern Carpathians). MTA Centre for the Humanities and MTA Centre for Ecological Research, Budapest and Vacratot
95. Young J, Watt A, Nowicki P, Alard D, Clitherow J, Henle K, Johnson R, Laczko E, McCracken D, Matouch S, Niemela J, Richards C (2005) Towards sustainable land use: identifying and managing the conflicts between human activities and biodiversity conservation in Europe. Biodivers Conserv 14:1641–1661
96. Henle K, Alard D, Clitherow J, Cobb P, Firbank L, Kull T, McCracken D, Moritz RFA, Niemelä J, Rebane M, Wascher D, Watt A, Young J (2008) Identifying and managing the conflicts between agriculture and biodiversity conservation in Europe – a review. Agric Ecosyst Environ 124:60–71
97. Halada L, Evans D, Romão C, Petersen JE (2011) Which habitats of European importance depend on agricultural practices? Biodivers Conserv 20:2365–2378
98. Papanikolaou AD, Fyllas NM, Mazaris AD, Dimitrakopoulos PG, Kallimanis AS, Pantis JD (2011) Grazing effects on plant functional group diversity in Mediterranean shrublands. Biodivers Conserv 20:2831–2843
99. Faria N, Rabaça JE, Morales MB (2012) The importance of grazing regime in the provision of breeding habitat for grassland birds: the case of the endangered little bustard (Tetrax tetrax). J Nat Conserv 20:211–218
100. Arponen A, Heikkinen RK, Paloniemi R, Pöyry J, Similä J, Kuussaari M (2013) Improving conservation planning for semi-natural grasslands: integrating connectivity into agrienvironment schemes. Biol Conserv 160:234–241