The role of predicate meaning in the development of reflexivity

What Makes Grammaticalization?: A Look from its Fringes and its Components

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 213-244

  König, Ekkehard ^a   Vezzosi, Letizia ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85065267535     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1515/9783110197440.4.213     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Campbell, Lyle 2001 What’s wrong with grammaticalization? In Special issue of Language Sciences, 2-3, Lyle Campbell (ed.), 113-161.
2. Chomsky, Noam 1981 Lectures on Government and Binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
3. Chomsky, Noam 1986 Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.
4. Cornrie, Bernard 1999 Reference-tracking: Description and explanation. Sprachtypologie und Universalienforschung 52: 335-346.
5. Croft, William 2003 Typology and Universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (2nd edn.).
6. Eckardt, Regine 2002 Reanalyzing selbst. Natural Language Semantics 9 (4): 371-412.
7. Eckardt, Regine 2003 The Structure of Change. Meaning Change under Reanalysis. Unpubl. Diss. HUBerlin.
8. Everaert, Martin 1986 The Syntax of Reftexivisation. Dordrecht: Foris.
9. Everaert, Martin 1991 Contextual determination of the anaphor/pronominal distinction. In Long-distance Anaphora, Jan Koster and Eric Reuland (eds.), 77-119. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Faltz, Leonard M. 1985 Reflexivization: A Study in Universal Syntax. New York: Garland Farr, James M.
11. Faltz, Leonard M. 1905 Intensives and Reflexives in Anglo-Saxon and Early Middle English. Baltimore: J.H. Fürst.
12. Gelderen, Elly van 2000 Jİ History of English Reflexive Pronouns. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
13. Haiman, John 1985a Natural Syntax. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Haiman, John 1985b (ed.), Iconicity in syntax. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
15. Haiman, John 1995 Grammatical signs of the divided self: A study of language and culture. In Discourse Grammar and Typology, Werner Abraham, Talmy Givón, and Sandra A. Tompson (eds.), 213-134. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
16. Haspelmath, Martin 1998 Does grammaticalization need reanalsis? Studies in Language 22 (2): 315-351.
17. Haspelmath, Martin 1999 Why is grammaticalization irreversible? Linguistics 37 (6): 1043-68.
18. Heine, Bernd Forthc. Accounting for creole reflexive forms. To appear in Lingua.
19. Heine, Bernd, Ulrike Claudi, and Friederike Hünnemeyer 1991 Grammaticalization: A Conceptual Framework. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
20. Hellan, Lars 1988 Reflexives in Norwegian and the Theory of Grammar. Dordrecht： Foris.
21. Hopper, Paul J., and Elisabeth C. Traugott 1993 Grammaticalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
22. Ito, Eiko 1978 Reflexive verbs in Chaucer. Studies in English Literature by the Eng-lish Literature Society of Japan: The English Number，65-89. Tokyo： Kenkyusha.
23. Keenan, Edward L. 2001 Creating Anaphors. An Historical Study ofthe English Reflexive Pro-nouns, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
24. Kemmer, Susan 1993a The Middle Voice: A Typological and Diachronic Study. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
25. Kemmer, Susan 1993b Emphatic reflexive -self. In Subjectivity and subjectivization in lan-guage, Dieter Stein and Susan Wright (eds.), 55-82. Cambridge: Cam-bridge University Press.
26. Kiparsky, Paul. 1990 Strong reflexives in Germanic. Paper presented at the Diachronic Syn-tax Conference, York.
27. Kiparsky, Paul. 2001 Disjoint reference and the typology of pronouns. In More than Words: A Festschriftfor D. Wunderlich, I. Kaufmann, I. and B. Stiebels (eds.), 179-226. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
28. König, Ekkehard 1998 Towards a typology of intensifiers. In Proceedings of the XVIth Inter-national Congress of Linguistics, Bernard Caron (ed.). Elsevier Science, CD ROM.
29. König, Ekkehard 2002 Towards a new typology of reflexive anaphors. To appear in Proceed-ings of the International Conference on Reflexives and Middle Con-structions, Ahmed Brahim (ed.). Leuven: Peeters.
30. König, Ekkehard, and Peter Siemund 2000a Intensifiers and reflexives: A typological perspective. In Reflexives: Forms and Functions, Zygmunt Frajzyngier and Traci S. Curl (eds.), 41-74. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
31. König, Ekkehard, and Peter Siemund 2000b development of complex reflexives and intensifiers in English. Dia-chronica 17 (1): 39-84.
32. König, Ekkehard, and Letizia Vezzosi 2002 Reziproke Konstruktionen im Deutschen. In Grammatische Kategor-ien aus sprachhisiorischer und typologischer Perspektive, Mitsunobu Yoshidaetal. (eds.), 205-219. Munich: iudicium.
33. Lehmann, Christian 1995 Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Munich: Lincom Europa.
34. Levinson, Stephen C. 1991 Pragmatic reduction of the Binding Conditions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 27： 107-161.
35. Newmeyer, Frederick J. 1998 Language Form and Language Function. Cambridge, Mass.： MIT Press.
36. Ogura, Michiko 1989 Verbs with the Reflexive Pronoun and Constructions with self in Old and Early Middle English. Cambridge: D. S. Brewer.
37. Ogura, Michiko 2001 Verbs used reflexively in Old and Middle English. Neuphilologische Mitteilungen 102: 23-36.
38. Peitsara, Kirsti 1997 development of reflexive strategies in English. In Grammatical-ization at Work, Matti Rissanen, Merja Kytö, and Kirsi Heikkonen (eds.), 277-370. Berlin/New York: Mouton de Gruyter,.
39. Reinhart, Tanya, and Eric Reuland 1993 Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 24: 657-720.
40. Turley, Jeffrey S. 1997 renovation of Romance reflexives. Romance Philology LI: 15-34.
41. Vezzosi, Letizia 2004 Self-forms in English: Grammaticalization or areal phenomena. MS. Università di Perugia.
42. Wiemer, Björn 1998 Reciprocal and reflexive constructions in Polish. To appear in Typology of Reciprocal Constructions, V. P. Nedjalkov.
43. Zribi-Hertz, Anne 1980 Coréférence et pronoms réfléchis: notes sur le contrast lui/lui-mème. Lingvisticae Investigationes 4: 189-196.
44. Zribi-Hertz, Anne 1989 Anaphor binding and narrative point of view. English reflexive pro-nouns in sentence and discourse. Language 65: 695-727.
45. Zribi-Hertz, Anne 1995 Emphatic or reflexive? On the endophoric character of French lui- mème and similar complex pronouns. Journal of Linguistics 31: 333-374.
46. Zribi-Hertz, Anne 2002 Réfléxivité et disjonction référentielle en français et en anglais. In Es-sais sur la grammaire comparée du français et de Fanglais, Philip Miller and Anne Zribi-Hertz (eds.), 135-174. Paris: Presses Universi- taires de Vincennes.
47. Zubizarreta, Maria-Luisa 1987 Levels of Representation in the Lexicon and in the Syntax. Dordrecht： Foris.