Disjoint reference and the typology of pronouns

More than Words: A Festschrift for Dieter Wunderlich

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 179-226

  Kiparsky, Paul ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85046502855     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (123)

1. Aissen, Judith (1997). On the syntax of obviation. Language 73, 705-750.
2. Anttila, Arto (1997). Variation in Finnish phonology and morphology. Ph.D thesis, Stanford University.
3. Aoun, Joseph and Yen-hui Audrey Li (1988). Minimal disjointness. WCCFL 7, 29-40.
4. Bach, Emmon and Barbara Partee (1980). Anaphora and semantic structure. In CLS Parasession on pronouns and anaphora, Jody Kreiman and Almerindo Ojeda (eds.), 1-28.
5. Battistella, Edwin (1989). Chinese reflexivization: a movement to INFL approach. Linguistics 27, 987-1012.
6. Bickerton, Derek (1987). He himself: anaphor, pronoun, or?. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 345-348.
7. Bfly, Milan (1981). Intrasentential pronominalization and functional sentence perspective. Lund: Lund Slavonic Monographs.
8. Bok-Bennema, Reineke (1984). On marked pronominal anaphors and Eskimo pro. In Grammatical Representation, Jacqueline Guéron, Hans-Georg Obenauer, and Jean-Yves Pollock (eds.), 1-18. Dordrecht: Foris.
9. Bouchard, Denis (1983). The Avoid Pronoun Principle and the Elsewhere Principle. NELS 13, 29-36.
10. Bresnan, Joan, Per-Kristian Halvorsen, and Joan Maling (1985). Logophoricity and bound anaphors. MS, Stanford.
11. Broadwell, George Aaron (1988). Reflexive movement in Choctaw. NELS 18, 53-64.
12. Burzio, Luigi (1996). The role of the antecedent in anaphoric relations. In Current issues in comparative grammar, Robert Freidin (ed.), 1-45. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
13. Burzio, Luigi (1998). Anaphora and soft constraints. In Is the best good enough? Optimality and competition in syntax, Pilar Barbosa, Danny Fox, Paul Hagstrom, Martha McGinnis, and David Pesetsky (eds.), 93-113. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
14. Cardinaletti, Anna, and Michal Starke (1996). Deficient pronouns: A view from Germanic. A study in the unified description of Germanic and Romance. In Studies in Comparative Germanic Syntax ?, Höskuldur Thráinsson, Samuel David Epstein, and Steve Peter (eds.), 21-65. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
15. Cho, Young-Mee Yu (1985). An LFG analysis of the Korean reflexive caki. In Harvard Studies in Korean Linguistics, Susumu Kuno et al. (eds.), 3-13. Seoul: Hanshin.
16. Chomsky, Noam (1981). Lectures on government and binding. Dordrecht: Foris.
17. Chomsky, Noam (1986). Knowledge of Language. New York: Praeger.
18. Chung, Sandra (1989). On the notion "null anaphor" in Chamorro. In The null subject parameter, Osvaldo Jaeggli and Kenneth J. Safir (eds.), 143-184. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
19. Clements, George N. (1975). The logophoric pronoun in Ewe: its role in discourse. Journal of West African Languages 10, 141-177.
20. Cole, Peter, Gabriella Hermon, and Li-May Sung (1990). Principles and parameters of long-distance reflexives. Linguistic Inquiry 21, 1-22.
21. Coleman, Carolyn (1987). Reflexive morphology in Kunparlang. In Working papers in grammatical theory and discourse structure: interactions of morphology, syntax, and discourse, Masayo Iida, StephenWechsler, and Draga Zee (eds.). Stanford: CSU Publications.
22. Dahlstrom, Amy (1988). Independent pronouns in Fox. In In honor of Mary Haas, William Shipley (ed.), 165-194. Berlin: Mouton.
23. Dahlstrom, Amy (1991). Plains Cree morphosyntax. Ph.D. Thesis, Berkeley.
24. Dalrymple, Mary (1993). The syntax of anaphoric binding. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
25. Dahlstrom, Amy and Stuart Shieber (1991). Ellipsis and higher-order unification. Lingustics and Philosophy 14, 399-452.
26. Diderichsen, Paul (1937). Om pronominerne sig og sin. Acta Philologica Scandinavica 13, 1-92.
27. Dowty, David (1980). Comments on the paper by Bach and Partee. In CLS Parasession on pronouns and anaphora, Jody Kreiman and Almerindo Ojeda (eds.), 29-40.
28. Enç, Mürvet (1983). Anchored Expressions. WCCFL 2, 79-88.
29. Enç, Mürvet (1989). Pronouns, licencing, and binding. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7, 51-92.
30. Everaert, Martin (1986). The syntax of reflexivization. Dordrecht: Foris.
31. Faltz, Leonard M. (1977). Reflexivization: a study in universal syntax. U.C. Berkeley Dissertation. Reprinted 1985, Garland, New York
32. Farmer, Ann K. and Robert H. Harnish (1987). Communicative reference with pronouns. In The pragmatic perspective, Marcella Bertucelli-Papi and Jef Verschueren (eds.), 547-65. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
33. Farrell, Patrick, Stephen A. Marlett, and David A. Perlmutter (1991). Notions of subjecthood and switch reference: evidence from Seri. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 431-456.
34. Giorgi, Alessandra (1987). The notion of Complete Functional Complex: some evidence from Italian. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 511-518.
35. Giorgi, Alessandra (1983). Toward a theory of long-distance anaphors. The Linguistic Review 3, 307-361.
36. Grafstein, Ann (1988). The Algonquian obviative and the Binding Theory. NELS 18, 175-192.
37. Grafstein, Ann (1989). Disjoint Reference in a 'Free Word Order' Language. In Native American Languages in Theoretical Perspective, Donna Gerdts and Karen Michelson (eds.), 163-75. Albany: SUNY Press.
38. Grimshaw, Jane (1990). Argument structure. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
39. Grimshaw, Jane and Sara Thomas (1990). Knowledge and obedience: the developmental status of the Binding Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 21, 187-222.
40. Hagège, Claude (1974). Les pronoms logophoriques. Bulletin de la Société de Linguistique de Paris 69, 287-310.
41. Haiman, John and Pamela Munro (1983). Switch reference. Typological studies in language 2. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
42. Harbert, Wayne (1983). Germanic reflexives and the implementation of binding conditions. In Language Change, Irmengard Rauch and Gerald F. Carr and (eds.), 89-127. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
43. Harbert, Wayne (1986). Markedness and the bindability of subject of NP. In Markedness, Fred F. Eckman, Edith A. Moravcsik, and Jessica R. Wirth (eds.), 139-54. New York: Plenum Press.
44. Harbert, Wayne (1990). Binding, SUBJECT, and Accessibility. In Proceedings of the Princeton workshop on comparative grammars, Robert Freidin (ed.), 29-55. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press.
45. Heath, Jeffrey (1983). Reference tracking in Nunggubuyu. In John Haiman and Pamela Munro (eds.), 129-49.
46. Heim, Irene, Howard Lasnik, and Robert May (1991). Reciprocity and plurality. Linguistic Inquiry 22, 63-101.
47. Hellan, Lars (1988). Reflexives in Norwegian and the theory of grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
48. Hellan, Lars (1990). A principle of global binding. In Grammar in progress: GLOW essays for Henk van Riemsdijk, 187-198. Dordrecht: Foris.
49. Hellberg, Staffan (1980). Reflexiveringen som ledtrâd till svenskans struktur. Gothenburg Papers in Theoretical Linguistics 42.
50. Herslund, Michael (1986). The double object construction in Danish. In Topics in Scandinavian syntax, Lars Hellan and Kristi Koch Christensen (eds.), 127-47. Dordrecht: Foris.
51. Hestvik, Arild (1990). Against the notion 'governing category'. WCCFL 9, 263-275.
52. Higginbotham, James (1983). Logical form, binding, and nomináis. Linguistic Inquiry 14, 355-420.
53. Higginbotham, James (1985). On semantics. Linguistic Inquiry 16, 547-593.
54. Hollenbach, Barbara (1984). Reflexives and Reciprocals in Cópala Trique. UAL 50, 272-291.
55. Hong, Ki-Sun (1989). Consciousness condition on the Korean reflexive Caki. BLS 15, 161-169.
56. Huang, C.T. James (1983). A note on the binding theory. Linguistic Inquiry 14, 554-561.
57. Huang, Yan (2000). Anaphora: A cross-linguistic study. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
58. Iatridou, Sabine (1986). An anaphor not bound in its governing category. Linguistic Inquiry 17, 766-772.
59. Joshi, Smita (1989). Logical subject in Marathi grammar and predicate argument structure. WCCFL 8, 207-219.
60. Kapur, Shyam, Barbara Lust, Wayne Harbert, and Gita Martohardono (1993). Universal Grammar and leamability theory: the case of binding domains and the 'Subset Principle'. In Knowledge and language: issues in representation and acquisition, Eric Reuland and Werner Abraham (eds.), 185-216. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
61. Keenan, Edward L. (1974). The functional principle: generalizing the notion of 'subject o f . CLS 10, 278-309.
62. Kemmer, Suzanne (1993). The middle voice. Amsterdam: Benjamins.
63. Kiparsky, Paul and Carol Kiparsky (1971). Fact. In Semantics, Danny D. Steinberg and Leon A. Jakobovits (eds.), 345-69. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
64. Klenin, Emily (1980). Sentential and discourse prominence. Russian Linguistics 4, 269-280.
65. König, Ekkehard (1991). The meaning of focus particles: A comprehensive perspective. London: Routledge.
66. Koopman, Hilda and Dominique Sportiche (1989). Pronouns, logical variables, and logophoricity in Abe. Linguistic Inquiry 20, 555-588.
67. Koster, Jan (1986). Domains and dynasties. Dordrecht: Foris.
68. Kroeger, Paul (1993). Phrase structure and grammatical relations in Tagalog. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
69. Kühner, Raphael and Carl Stegmann (1966). Ausführliche Grammatik der lateinischen Sprache. Hannover: Verlag Hahnsche Buchhandlung.
70. Kuno, Susumu (1972). Pronominalization, reflexivization, and direct discourse. Linguistic Inquiry 3, 161-95.
71. Kuno, Susumu (1987). Functional syntax. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Lasnik, Howard (1976). Remarks on coreference. Linguistic Analysis 2, 1-22.
72. Kuno, Susumu (1989). On the necessity of binding conditions. In Essays on anaphora, Howard Lasnik, 149-67. Dordrecht: Kluwer.
73. Lebeaux, David (1985). Locality and anaphoric binding. The Linguistic Review 4, 343-363.
74. Lees, R.B. and E.S. Klima (1963). Rules for English pronominalization. Language 39, 17-28.
75. Legendre, Geraldine, Paul Smolensky, and Colin Wilson (1996). When is Less More? Faithfulness and Minimal Links in wh-Chains. Rutgers Optimality Archive (ROA 117).
76. Levinson, Stephen C. (1987). Pragmatics and the grammar of anaphora: a partial pragmatic. reduction of binding and control phenomena. Journal of Linguistics 23, 379-434.
77. Levinson, Stephen C. (1991). Pragmatic reduction of the binding conditions revisited. Journal of Linguistics 27,107-161.
78. Levinson, Stephen C. (1991). Presumptive meanings. Cambridge, Mass.: Bradford Books.
79. Lichtenberk, Frantisek (1983). Manam. Oceanic Linguistics Special Publications 18, University of Hawaii Press.
80. Mitchell, Bruce (1985). Old English syntax. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
81. Mohanan, K.P. (1982). Grammatical relations and anaphora in Malayalam. In MIT working papers in linguistics 4, Alec Marantz and Tim Stowell (eds.), 163-190. MIT: Linguistics Department.
82. Moyne, John (1971). Reflexive and emphatic. Language 47, 141-163.
83. Napoli, Donna Jo (1989). Predication theory: a case study for indexing theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
84. Nerbonne, John (1982). German impersonal passives: a non-structure-preserving lexical rule. WCCFL 1, 341-352.
85. Ogura, Michiko (1989). Verbs with the reflexive pronoun and constructions with self in old and early Middle English. Cambridge, Mass: D.S. Brewer.
86. Partee, Barbara H. (1989). Binding implicit quantifiers in quantified contexts. CLS 25, 342-65.
87. Peshkovskij, Aleksandr Matveevich (1956). Russkii sintaksis ? nauchnom osveshchenij. Gosudarstvennoe Uchebno-pedagogichestvoe Izdatelstvo Ministerstva Moskva: RSFSR.
88. Pica, Pierre (1987). On the nature of the reflexivization cycle. NELS 17, 483-499.
89. Pollard, Carl and Ivan Sag (1983). Reflexives and reciprocals in English: an alternative to the Binding Theory. WCCFL 2, 189-203.
90. Pica, Pierre (1992). Anaphors in English and the scope of Binding Theory. Linguistic Inquiry 23, 261-303.
91. Reinhart, Tanya (1983). Coreference and bound anaphora: a restatement of the anaphora question. Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 47-88.
92. Reinhart, Tanya (1983). Anaphora and semantic interpretation. London: CroomHelm.
93. Reinhart, Tanya and Eric Reuland (1993). Reflexivity. Linguistic Inquiry 28, 178-87.
94. Rigau, Gemma (1986). Some remarks on the nature of strong pronouns in null-subject languages. In Generative studies in Spanish syntax, Ivonne Bordelois, Heles Contreras, and Karen Zagona (eds.), 143-63. Dordrecht: Foris.
95. Roberts, John R. (1988). Amele switch-reference and the theory of grammar. Linguistic Inquiry 19, 45-64.
96. Rose, Marilyn Louise (1976). The syntax of the reflexive pronoun in Gothic and Old Norse. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Wisconsin-Madison.
97. Sag, Ivan and Jorge Hankamer (1984). Towards a theory of anaphoric processing. Linguistics and Philosophy 7, 325-345.
98. Saxon, Leslie (1986). The syntax of pronouns in Dogrib. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, San Diego.
99. Schwartz, Linda J. and Timothy Dunnigan (1986). Pronouns and pronominal categories in Southwestern Ojibwe. In Pronominal systems, Ursula Wiesemann (ed.), 285-322. Tübingen: Narr.
100. di Sciullo, Anna-Maria and Edwin Williams (1987). On the definition of word. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
101. Sells, Peter (1986). Coreference and bound anaphora: a restatement of the facts. NELS 16, 434-416.
102. Sells, Peter (1987). Aspects of logophoricity. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 445-479.
103. Sells, Peter (1991). Disjoint reference into NP. Linguistics and Philosophy 14, 151-69.
104. Sells, Peter, Annie Zaenen, and Draga Zee (1987). Reflexivization variation: relations between syntax, semantics, and lexical structure. In Working Papers in Grammatical Theory and Discourse Structure, Masaiyo Iida, Stephen Wechsler, and Draga Zee (eds.), 169-238. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
105. Slupesky, Ted (1989). Deixis and anaphora in the Homeric dialect. B.A. Thesis, Reed College.
106. Tang, Chih-Chen Jane (1989). Chinese reflexives. Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 7, 93-121.
107. Thompson, Laurence C. (1965). A Vietnamese grammar. Seattle: University of Washington Press.
108. Thráinsson, Höskuldur (1979). On complementation in Icelandic. New York: Garland.
109. Thráinsson, Höskuldur (1991). Long-distance reflexives and the typology of NPs. In Long-distance anaphora, Jan Köster and Eric Reuland (eds.), 49-75. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
110. Tiersma, P.M. (1985). Frisian reference grammar. Dordrecht: Foris.
111. Timberlake, Alan (1979). Reflexivization and the cycle in Russian. Linguistic Inquiry 10, 109-141.
112. Timberlake, Alan (1980). Reference conditions on Russian reflexivization. Language 56, 777-796.
113. Toivonen, Y.H. (1955). Suomen kielen etymologinen sanakirja I, Helsinki: Suomalais-Ugrilainen Seura.
114. Tremblay, Mireille (1990). An argument sharing approach to ditransitive constructions. WCCFL 9, 549-563.
115. Vikner, Sten (1985). Parameters of binder and of binding category in Danish. Working Papers in Scandinavian Syntax 23, 1-61. Lund.
116. Walker, Alastair G. H. (1989). Frisian. In The dialects of Modern German, Charles Russ (ed.), 1-30. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
117. Wellander, Erik (1959). Riktig svenska 3. Stockholm: Svenska Bokförlaget.
118. Wexler, Ken and Rita M. Manzini (1987). Parameters, Binding Theory, and learnability. Linguistic Inquiry 18, 413-444.
119. Wiesemann, Ursula (1986). Grammaticalized coreference. In Pronominal systems, Ursula Wiesemann (ed.), 437-63. Tübingen: Narr.
120. Yadurajan, K.S. (1987). Binding theory and reflexives in Dravidian. MS, CIEFL, Hyderabad.
121. Yang, Dong-Whee (1983). The Extended Binding Theory of anaphors. Language research 19, 169-192.
122. Yokoyama, Olga (1975). Personal or reflexive? A functional analysis. Harvard studies in syntax and semantics I, 72-112. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University.
123. Zribi-Hertz, A. (1989). Anaphor binding and point of view: English reflexive pronouns in. sentence and discourse. Language 65, 695-727.