메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 69, Issue 7-8, 2018, Pages 236-239

Statistical strategies to address main research questions of the mispex network and meta-analytical approaches;Statistische strategien zur beantwortung der hauptfragestellungen des mispex-netzwerks und metaanalytische herangehensweisen

Author keywords

Aggregation; Analysis strategy; Back pain; Prevention

Indexed keywords


EID: 85064769041     PISSN: 03445925     EISSN: 25105264     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.5960/DZSM.2018.339     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (4)

References (11)
  • 1
    • 0033008515 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • FRIEDENREICH C. Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology
    • BLETTNER M, SAUERBREI W, SCHLEHOFER B, SCHEUCHENPFLUG T, FRIEDENREICH C. Traditional reviews, meta-analyses and pooled analyses in epidemiology. Int J Epidemiol 1999; 28: 1-9.
    • (1999) Int J Epidemiol , vol.28 , pp. 1-9
    • Blettner, M.1    Sauerbrei, W.2    Schlehofer, B.3    Scheuchenpflug, T.4
  • 2
    • 54449084430 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: A choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales
    • COPAY AG, GLASSMAN SD, SUBACH BR, BERVEN S, SCHULER TC, CARREON LY. Minimum clinically important difference in lumbar spine surgery patients: a choice of methods using the Oswestry Disability Index, Medical Outcomes Study questionnaire Short Form 36, and pain scales. Spine J. 2008; 8: 968-974. doi:10.1016/j. spinee.2007.11.006
    • (2008) Spine J , vol.8 , pp. 968-974
    • Copay, A.G.1    Glassman, S.D.2    Subach, B.R.3    Berven, S.4    Schuler, T.C.5    Carreon, L.Y.6
  • 4
    • 0022992740 scopus 로고
    • Meta-analysis in clinical trials
    • DERSIMONIAN R, LAIRD N. Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials. 1986; 7: 177-188. doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2
    • (1986) Control Clin Trials , vol.7 , pp. 177-188
    • Dersimonian, R.1    Laird, N.2
  • 6
    • 0025757314 scopus 로고
    • The Efficacy of Diagnostic Imaging
    • FRYBACK DG, THORNBURY JR. The Efficacy of Diagnostic Imaging. Med Decis Making. 1991; 11: 88-94. doi:10.1177/0272989X9101100203
    • (1991) Med Decis Making , vol.11 , pp. 88-94
    • Fryback, D.G.1    Thornbury, J.2
  • 7
    • 84907424687 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Minimal clinically important difference: Defining what really matters to patients
    • MCGLOTHLIN AE, LEWIS RJ. Minimal clinically important difference: defining what really matters to patients. JAMA. 2014; 312: 1342-1343. doi:10.1001/jama.2014.13128
    • (2014) JAMA , vol.312 , pp. 1342-1343
    • McGlothlin, A.E.1    Lewis, R.J.2
  • 8
    • 0001287271 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso
    • TIBSHIRANI R. Regression shrinkage and selection via the lasso. J R Stat Soc B. 1996; 58: 267-288.
    • (1996) J R Stat Soc B , vol.58 , pp. 267-288
    • Tibshirani, R.1
  • 9
    • 84966350772 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • How Much Better Is Good Enough?: Patient-reported Outcomes, Minimal Clinically Important Differences, and Patient Acceptable Symptom States in Perioperative Research
    • WIJEYSUNDERA DN, JOHNSON SR. How Much Better Is Good Enough?: Patient-reported Outcomes, Minimal Clinically Important Differences, and Patient Acceptable Symptom States in Perioperative Research. Anesthesiology. 2016; 125: 7-10. doi:10.1097/ALN.0000000000001159
    • (2016) Anesthesiology , vol.125 , pp. 7-10
    • Dn, W.1    Sr, J.2
  • 11
    • 85055924442 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Statistical Development on Determing the Minimium Clinically Important Difference
    • XU T. Statistical Development on Determing the Minimium Clinically Important Difference. Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal. 2015; 2. doi:10.15406/bbij.2015.02.00041
    • (2015) Biometrics & Biostatistics International Journal , vol.2
    • Xu, T.1


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.