메뉴 건너뛰기




Volumn 125, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 7-10

How Much Better Is Good Enough?: Patient-reported Outcomes, Minimal Clinically Important Differences, and Patient Acceptable Symptom States in Perioperative Research

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CLINICAL RESEARCH; HUMAN; LIKERT SCALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUALITY OF RECOVERY 15; QUALITY OF RECOVERY 40; QUALITY OF RECOVERY SCORE; RATING SCALE; REVIEW; SCORING SYSTEM; SURGICAL MORTALITY; SURGICAL PATIENT; SYMPTOMATOLOGY; MINIMAL CLINICALLY IMPORTANT DIFFERENCE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; QUESTIONNAIRE;

EID: 84966350772     PISSN: 00033022     EISSN: 15281175     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001159     Document Type: Review
Times cited : (17)

References (17)
  • 1
    • 84866517922 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Evidence-based Peri-operative Clinical Outcomes Research (EPiCOR) Group: Perioperative and anaesthetic-related mortality in developed and developing countries: A systematic review and metaanalysis
    • Bainbridge D, Martin J, Arango M, Cheng D: Evidence-based Peri-operative Clinical Outcomes Research (EPiCOR) Group: Perioperative and anaesthetic-related mortality in developed and developing countries: A systematic review and metaanalysis. Lancet 2012; 380:1075-81
    • (2012) Lancet , vol.380 , pp. 1075-1081
    • Bainbridge, D.1    Martin, J.2    Arango, M.3    Cheng, D.4
  • 2
    • 62349105769 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Development of the functional recovery index for ambulatory surgery and anesthesia
    • Wong J, Tong D, De Silva Y, Abrishami A, Chung F: Development of the functional recovery index for ambulatory surgery and anesthesia. Anesthesiology 2009; 110:596-602
    • (2009) Anesthesiology , vol.110 , pp. 596-602
    • Wong, J.1    Tong, D.2    De Silva, Y.3    Abrishami, A.4    Chung, F.5
  • 6
    • 0024852022 scopus 로고
    • Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference
    • Jaeschke R, Singer J, Guyatt GH: Measurement of health status. Ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 1989; 10:407-15
    • (1989) Control Clin Trials , vol.10 , pp. 407-415
    • Jaeschke, R.1    Singer, J.2    Guyatt, G.H.3
  • 9
    • 0036195669 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group: Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures
    • Guyatt GH, Osoba D, Wu AW, Wyrwich KW, Norman GR: Clinical Significance Consensus Meeting Group: Methods to explain the clinical significance of health status measures. Mayo Clin Proc 2002; 77:371-83
    • (2002) Mayo Clin Proc , vol.77 , pp. 371-383
    • Guyatt, G.H.1    Osoba, D.2    Wu, A.W.3    Wyrwich, K.W.4    Norman, G.R.5
  • 10
    • 79953862195 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • A point of minimal important difference (MID): A critique of terminology and methods
    • King MT: A point of minimal important difference (MID): A critique of terminology and methods. Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2011; 11:171-84
    • (2011) Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res , vol.11 , pp. 171-184
    • King, M.T.1
  • 11
    • 5444246327 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Half standard deviation estimate of the minimally important difference in HRQOL scores?
    • Farivar SS, Liu H, Hays RD: Half standard deviation estimate of the minimally important difference in HRQOL scores? Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res 2004; 4:515-23
    • (2004) Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res , vol.4 , pp. 515-523
    • Farivar, S.S.1    Liu, H.2    Hays, R.D.3
  • 12
    • 11844294054 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • It's good to feel better but it's better to feel good
    • Dougados M: It's good to feel better but it's better to feel good. J Rheumatol 2005; 32:1-2
    • (2005) J Rheumatol , vol.32 , pp. 1-2
    • Dougados, M.1
  • 14
    • 84975526119 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Clinical importance
    • Accessed March 25, 2016
    • Beaton DE. Clinical Importance: The OMERACT Perspective. 2004. Available at: http://www. immpact. org/static/meetings/ Immpact4/background/beaton. pdf. Accessed March 25, 2016
    • (2004) The OMERACT Perspective
    • Beaton, D.E.1
  • 15
    • 84965161729 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • Towards a core and extended outcome set
    • on behalf of the COMPAC-StEP Group. Standardizing end points in perioperative trials
    • Myles PS, Grocott MP, Boney O, Moonesinghe SR, on behalf of the COMPAC-StEP Group. Standardizing end points in perioperative trials: Towards a core and extended outcome set. Br J Anaesth 2016; 116:586-9
    • (2016) Br J Anaesth , vol.116 , pp. 586-589
    • Myles, P.S.1    Grocott, M.P.2    Boney, O.3    Moonesinghe, S.R.4
  • 16
    • 37749041179 scopus 로고    scopus 로고
    • OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology
    • Tugwell P, Boers M, Brooks P, Simon L, Strand V, Idzerda L: OMERACT: An international initiative to improve outcome measurement in rheumatology. Trials 2007; 8:38
    • (2007) Trials , vol.8 , pp. 38
    • Tugwell, P.1    Boers, M.2    Brooks, P.3    Simon, L.4    Strand, V.5    Idzerda, L.6


* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.