The somatic marker as a “short cut” to verbal immediacy

Communication Research Reports

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 389-398

  Hickson, Mark ^a   Turner, Joshua ^a   Powell, Larry ^a   Neiva, Eduardo ^a   Adams, Carol T ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA AT BIRMINGHAM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064308632     PISSN: 08824096     EISSN: 17464099     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08824090209384867     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Berger, C. R., and Calabrese, R. J., 1975. Some explorations in initial interaction and beyond: Toward a theory of interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1: 99–112.
2. Brothers, L., 1989. A biological perspective on empathy. American Journal of Psychiatry, 146: 10–19.
3. Damasio, A. R., 1994. Descartes’ error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain, New York: Avon.
4. Damasio, A. R., 1999. The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness, New York: Harcourt, Brace, and Company.
5. Damasio, A. R., Tranel, D., and Damasio, H., 1991. “ Somatic markers and the guidance of behavior: Theory and preliminary testing ”. In Frontal lobe function and dysfunction, Edited by: Levin, H. S., Eisenberg, H. M., and Benton, A. L., 217–229. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Davis, M. S., 1973. Intimate relations, New York: Free Press.
7. Dewey, J., 1922. Analysis of the reflex arc. The Journal of Philosophy, 19: 29–38.
8. Foss, S. K., Foss, K. A., and Trapp, R., 1991. Contemporary perspectives on rhetoric., 2d ed., Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland.
9. Gorham, J., 1988. The relationship between verbal teacher immediacy behaviors and student learning. Communication Education, 37: 40–53.
10. Grassi, E., 1987. The ordinary quality of the poetic and rhetorical world: Heidegger, Ungaretti, and Neruda,”. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 20: 248–260.
11. Hauser, M. D., 2000. Wild minds: What animals really think, New York: Henry Holt.
12. Hickson, M., III and Stacks, D. W., 1995. “ An evolutionary, bio‐social approach to intrapersonal communication ”. In Intrapersonal communication processes, Edited by: Aitken, J. E., and Shedletsky, L. J., 24–35. Annandale, VA: Speech Communication Association.
13. Johnson, M., 1987. The body in the mind: The bodily basis of meaning, imagination, and reason, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
14. Jourard, S. M., 1964. The transparent self: Self‐disclosure and well‐being, Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.
15. Jourard, S. M., 1968. Disclosing man to himself, Princeton, NJ: D. Van Nostrand.
16. Lakoff, G., 1987. Women, fire, and dangerous things: What categories reveal about the mind, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
17. Lashley, K. S., 1950. In search of the engram. Symposia of the Society for Experimental Biology, 4: 227–302.
18. McCroskey, J. C., and Beatty, M. J., 1998. “ Communication apprehension ”. In Communication and personality: Trait perspectives, Edited by: McCroskey, J. C., Martin, M. M., and Beatty, M. J., 215–231. Creskill, NJ: Hampton.
19. McCroskey, J. C., and McCain, T. A., 1974. The measurement of interpersonal attraction. Speech Monographs, 41: 261–266.
20. McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., and Daly, J., 1975. The measurement of perceived homophily in interpersonal communication. Human Communication Research, 1: 323–332.
21. McCroskey, J. C., and Teven, J. J., 1999. Goodwill: A reexamination of the construct and its measurement. Communication Monographs, 66: 90–103.
22. McCroskey, J. C., and Young, T. J., 1981. Ethos and credibility: The construct and its measurement after three decades. Central States Speech Journal, 32: 24–34.
23. Powell, L., Hamilton, T., Hickson, M., and Stuckey, J., 2001. The relationship of homophily to verbal and nonverbal immediacy in the classroom. Communication Research Reports, 18: 217–222.
24. Powell, L., Hickson, M., III and Hill, S. R., Jr. 1977. Attitudinal homophily as a source of uncertainty reduction. Canadian Speech Communication Journal, 9: 76–82.
25. Powell, L., Hickson, M., III and Hill, S. R., Jr. 1980. Path analysis of attitudinal, dispositional, and situational predictions in impression formation. Psychological Reports, 37: 327–333.
26. Powell, L., Hill, S. R., Jr. and Hickson, M., III. 1977. Canonical relationships between prestige and interpersonal attraction. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44: 23–29.
27. Restak, R. M., 1984. The brain, Toronto: Bantam.
28. Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., and McCroskey, J. C., 1987. “ The relationship between selected immediacy behaviors and Cognitive learning ”. In Communication Yearbook, Edited by: McLaughlin, M. L., Vol. 10, 574–590. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
29. Smith, C. U. M., 1972. The brain: Towards an understanding, New York: Capricorn.
30. Zunin, L., and Zunin, N., 1972. Contact: The first four minutes, New York: Ballantine.