Mapping urban impervious surfaces from medium and high spatial resolution multispectral imagery

Remote Sensing of Impervious Surfaces

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 59-73

  Lu, Dengsheng ^a   Weng, Qihao ^b  

^a AUBURN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b EARTH RESOURCES OBSERVATION AND SCIENCE EROS CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 85064080442     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Slonecker, E.T., Jennings, D., and Garofalo, D., Remote sensing of impervious surface: a review, Remote Sensing Reviews, 20, 227, 2001.
2. Brabec, E., Schulte, S., and Richards, P.L., Impervious surface and water quality: a review of current literature and its implications for watershed planning, Journal of Planning Literature, 16, 499, 2002.
3. Hodgson, M.E., et al., Synergistic use of Lidar and color aerial photography for mapping urban parcel imperviousness, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69, 973, 2003.
4. Dougherty, M., et al., Evaluation of impervious surface estimates in a rapidly urbanizing watershed, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 70, 1275, 2004.
5. Jennings, D.B., Jarnagin, S.T., and Ebert, C.W., A modeling approach for estimating watershed impervious surface area from national land cover data 92, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 70, 1295, 2004.
6. Ji, M. and Jensen, J.R., Effectiveness of subpixel analysis in detecting and quantifying urban imperviousness from Landsat Thematic Mapper, Geocarto International, 14, 31, 1999.
7. Civico, D.L., et al., Quantifying and describing urbanizing landscapes in the northeast United States, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 68, 1083, 2002.
8. Phinn, S., et al., Monitoring the composition of urban environments based on the vegetation-impervious surface-soil (VIS) model by subpixel analysis techniques, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23, 4131, 2002.
9. Rashed, T., et al., Measuring the physical composition of urban morphology using multiple endmember spectral mixture models, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69, 1011, 2003.
10. Yang, L., et al., An approach for mapping large-area impervious surface: synergistic use of Landsat 7 ETM+ and high spatial resolution imagery, Canadian Journal of Remote Sensing, 29, 230, 2003.
11. Yang, L., et al., Urban land cover change detection through sub-pixel imperviousness mapping using remotely sensed data, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 69, 1003, 2003.
12. Goetz, S.J., et al., Integrated analysis of ecosystem interactions with land use change: the Chesapeake Bay watershed, in Ecosystems and Land Use Change, DeFries, R.S., Asner, G.P., and Houghton, R.A., Eds., American Geophysical Union, Washington, D.C., p. 263, 2004.
13. Jantz, P., Goetz, S.J., and Jantz, C.A., Urbanization and the loss of resource lands within the Chesapeake Bay watershed, Environmental Management, 36, 808, 2005.
14. Wu, C. and Murray, A.T., Estimating impervious surface distribution by spectral mixture analysis, Remote Sensing of Environment, 84, 49, 2003.
15. Wu, C., Normalized spectral mixture analysis for monitoring urban composition using ETM+ imagery, Remote Sensing of Environment, 93, 480, 2004.
16. Lu, D. and Weng, Q., Use of impervious surface in urban land use classification, Remote Sensing of Environment, 102, 146, 2006.
17. Bauer, M.E., et al., Impervious surface mapping and change monitoring using Landsat remote sensing, ASPRS Annual Conference Processings, Denver, Colorado, American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, Bethesda, MD, May 23-28, 2004.
18. Gillies, R.R., et al., Effects of urbanization on the aquatic fauna of the Line Creek watershed, Atlanta-a satellite perspective, Remote Sensing of Environment, 86, 411, 2003.
19. Small, C., The Landsat ETM+ spectral mixing space, Remote Sensing of Environment, 93, 1, 2004.
20. Smith, M.O., et al., Vegetation in Deserts: I. A regional measure of abundance from multispectral images, Remote Sensing of Environment, 31, 1, 1990.
21. Adams, J.B., et al., Classification of multispectral images based on fractions of endmembers: application to land cover change in the Brazilian Amazon, Remote Sensing of Environment, 52,137, 1995.
22. Mustard, J.F. and Sunshine, J.M., Spectral analysis for earth science: investigations using remote sensing data, in Remote Sensing for the Earth Sciences: Manual of Remote Sensing, 3rd ed., Vol. 3, Rencz, A.N., Ed., John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, p. 251, 1999.
23. Weng, Q., Lu, D., and Schubring, J., Estimation of land surface temperaturevegetation abundance relationship for urban heat island studies, Remote Sensing of Environment, 89, 467, 2004.
24. Lu, D. and Weng, Q., Spectral mixture analysis of the urban landscapes in Indianapolis with Landsat ETM+ imagery, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 70, 1053, 2004.
25. Lu, D. and Weng, Q., Urban classification using full spectral information of Landsat ETM+ imagery in Marion County, Indiana, Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 71, 1275, 2005.
26. Fankhauser, R., Automatic determination of imperviousness in urban areas from digital orthophotos, Water Science and Technology, 39, 81, 1999.
27. Goetz, S.J., et al., IKONOS imagery for resource management: tree cover, impervious surface, and riparian buffer analyses in the mid-Atlantic region, Remote Sensing of Environment, 88,195, 2003.
28. Foody, G.M., Hard and soft classifications by a neural network with a nonexhaustively defined set of classes, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 23, 3853, 2002.
29. Friedl, M.A. and Brodley, C.E., Decision tree classification of land cover from remotely sensed data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 61, 399, 1997.
30. Pal, M. and Mather, P.M., An assessment of the effectiveness of decision tree methods for land cover classification, Remote Sensing of Environment, 86, 554, 2003.
31. Congalton, R.G., A review of assessing the accuracy of classification of remotely sensed data, Remote Sensing of Environment, 37, 35, 1991.
32. Smits, P.C., Dellepiane, S.G., and Schowengerdt, R.A., Quality assessment of image classification algorithms for land-cover mapping: a review and a proposal for a cost-based approach, International Journal of Remote Sensing, 20, 1461, 1999.
33. Foody, G.M., Status of land cover classification accuracy assessment, Remote Sensing of Environment, 80, 185, 2002.