Preprint policies among 14 academic publishers

Journal of Academic Librarianship

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2019, Pages 162-170

  Teixeira da Silva, Jaime A ^a   Dobránszki, Judit ^b  

^a Miki cho Post Office   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF DEBRECEN   (Hungary)

Author keywords

ASAPbio; bioRxiv; Peer review; Preprint server; Sherpa RoMEO

Indexed keywords

EID: 85061674730     PISSN: 00991333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acalib.2019.02.009     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Berg, J., Preprint ecosystems. Science, 357(6358), 2017, 1331, 10.1126/science.aaq0167.
2. Berg, J.M., Bhalla, N., Bourne, P.E., Chalfie, M., Drubin, D.G., Fraser, J.S., Wolberger, C., Preprints for the life sciences. Science 352:6288 (2016), 899–901, 10.1126/science.aaf9133.
3. Bove-Fenderson, E., Duffy, K., Mannstadt, M., Broadening our horizons: JBMR and JBMR Plus embrace preprints. Journal of Bone and Mineral Research 33:2 (2018), 185–187, 10.1002/jbmr.3386.
4. Callaway, E., Funders call for bio-preprints hub. Nature 542:7641 (2017), 283–284, 10.1038/nature.2017.21466.
5. Callaway, E., BioRxiv preprint server gets cash boost from Chan Zuckerberg Initiative. Nature, 545, 2017, 18, 10.1038/nature.2017.21894.
6. Desjardins-Proulx, P., White, E.P., Adamson, J.J., Ram, K., Poisot, T., Gravel, D., The case for open preprints in biology. PLoS Biology, 11(5), 2013, e1001563, 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001563.
7. Kaiser, J., The preprint dilemma. Science 357:6358 (2017), 1344–1349, 10.1126/science.357.6358.1344.
8. Kleinert, S., Horton, R., Preprints with The Lancet: Joining online research discussion platforms. The Lancet 391 (2018), 2482–2483, 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31125-5.
9. Loew, L.M., Peer review and bioRxiv. Biophysical Journal 111 (2016), E01–E02, 10.1016/j.bpj.2016.06.035.
10. Maslove, D.M., Medical preprints - A debate worth having (note). Journal of the American Medical Association 319:5 (2018), 443–444, 10.1001/jama.2017.17566.
11. Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Fake peer reviews, fake identities, fake accounts, fake data: Beware!. AME Medical Journal, 2, 2017, 28, 10.21037/amj.2017.02.10.
12. Teixeira da Silva, J.A., The preprint wars. AME Medical Journal, 2, 2017, 74, 10.21037/amj.2017.05.23.
13. Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Preprints: Ethical hazard or academic liberation?. KOME 5:2 (2017), 73–80, 10.17646/KOME.2017.26.
14. Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Preprints should not be cited. Current Science 113:6 (2017), 1026–1027.
15. Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Intellectual phishing, hidden conflicts of interest and hidden data: New risks of preprints. Journal of Advocacy, Research and Education 4:3 (2017), 136–146.
16. Teixeira da Silva, J.A., The preprint debate: What are the issues?. Medical Journal Armed Forces India 74:2 (2018), 162–164, 10.1016/j.mjafi.2017.08.002.
17. Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Dobránszki, J., How authorship is defined by multiple publishing organizations and STM publishers. Accountability in Research 16:2 (2016), 97–122, 10.1080/08989621.2015.1047927.
18. Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Dobránszki, J., Excessively long editorial decisions and excessively long publication times by journals: Causes, risks, consequences, and proposed solutions. Publishing Research Quarterly 33:1 (2017), 101–108, 10.1007/s12109-016-9489-9.
19. Teixeira da Silva, J.A., Dobránszki, J., Notices and policies for retractions, expressions of concern, errata and corrigenda: Their importance, content, and context. Science and Engineering Ethics 23:2 (2017), 521–554, 10.1007/s11948-016-9769-y.
20. Verma, I.M., Preprint servers facilitate scientific discourse (editorial). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 114(48), 2017, 12630, 10.1073/pnas.1716857114.
21. Wicherts, J.M., The weak spots in contemporary science (and how to fix them). Animals, 7, 2017, 90, 10.3390/ani7120090.