Broadening Our Horizons: JBMR and JBMR Plus Embrace Preprints

Journal of Bone and Mineral Research

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2018, Pages 185-187

  Bove Fenderson, Erin ^a   Duffy, Katie ^b   Mannstadt, Michael ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b American Society for Bone and Mineral Research   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BONE; BONE MINERAL; COMMUNITY; COMPETITION; CONSENSUS; EDITORIAL; EXCITEMENT; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; PEER REVIEW; POLICY; PUBLICATION; PUBLISHING; SCIENTIST;

PEER REVIEW, RESEARCH; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PREPRINTS AS TOPIC;

EID: 85041575090     PISSN: 08840431     EISSN: 15234681     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/jbmr.3386     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Cobb M. The prehistory of biology preprints: a forgotten experiment from the 1960s. PeerJ Preprints. 2017; 5:e3174v1. DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.3174v1. Available from: https://peerj.com/preprints/3174/.
2. Nature respects preprint servers … despite false rumours to the contrary. Nature. 2005; 434(7031):257. DOI: 10.1038/434257b. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/434257b.
3. Angell M, Kassirer JP. The Ingelfinger rule revisited. N Engl J Med. 1991; 325(19):1371–3. DOI: 10.1056/NEJM199111073251910. Available from: http://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJM199111073251910.
4. Science: editorial policies [Internet]. Science|AAAS; 2017 [cited: 2018 Jan 19]. Available from: http://www.sciencemag.org/authors/science-editorial-policies.
5. [No authors listed]. Preprints under peer review. Nat Commun. 2017 Sep 12; 8(1):553. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-017-00950-5. Available from: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-017-00950-5.
6. Kaiser J. The preprint dilemma. Science. 2017; 357(6358):1344–9. DOI: 10.1126/science.357.6358.1344. Available from: http://science.sciencemag.org/content/357/6358/1344.full.